Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington,WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

 

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.     )

 

Filed by the Registrant    þ

 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant    o

 

Check the appropriate box:

oþ

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

þo

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

Definitive Additional Materials

o

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

 

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

þ

No fee required

o

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i) (1) and 0-11.

 

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 

 

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 

 

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

 

 

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 

 

 

(5)

Total fee paid:

 

 

 

 

 

o

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 

 

 

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

 

 

(3)

Filing Party:

 

 

 

 

(4)

Date Filed:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

 

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

 

HELEN OF TROY LIMITED

Clarendon House

2 Church Street

Hamilton, Bermuda

July 14, 2014

 

Dear Shareholders:

 

It is my pleasure to invite you to the 20142016 Annual General Meeting of the Shareholders of Helen of Troy Limited. The meeting will be held at 1:00 p.m., Mountain Daylight Time, on Tuesday,Wednesday, August 26, 2014,17, 2016, at the Marriott Hotel 1600 Airway Blvd.,Indigo El Paso, Texas.325 N. Kansas Street, El Paso, Texas 79901. In addition to the business to be transacted at the meeting, members of management will present information about the Company’s operations and will be available to respond to your questions.

 

We encourage you to help us reduce printing and mailing costs and conserve natural resources by signing up for electronic delivery of our shareholder communications. For more information, see “Electronic Delivery of Shareholder Communications” in the enclosed proxy statement.

 

At our meeting, we will vote on proposals (1) to set the number of Director positions at eight (or such lower number as shall equal the number of nominees elected as Directors) and elect the eight nominees to our Board of Directors, (2) to provide advisory approval of the Company’s executive compensation, (3) to approve nine proposals relating to the Company’s Amended and Restated Bye-laws, (4) to approve an amendment to the Helen of Troy Limited Amended and Restated 2011 Annual Incentive Plan, (4)(5) to appoint Grant Thornton LLP as the Company’s auditor and independent registered public accounting firm and to authorize the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to set the auditor’s remuneration, and (5)(6) to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.  The accompanying Notice of Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and proxy statement contains information that you should consider when you vote your shares. Also, for your convenience, you can appoint your proxy via touch-tone telephone or the internet at:

 

1-800-690-6903 or WWW.PROXYVOTE.COM

 

It is important that you vote your shares whether or not you plan to attend the meeting. Please complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the accompanying envelope as soon as possible, or appoint your proxy by telephone or on the Internet as set forth above. If you plan to attend the meeting and wish to vote in person, you may revoke your proxy and vote in person at that time. I look forward to seeing you at the meeting. On behalf of the management and directors of Helen of Troy Limited, I want to thank you for your continued support and confidence.

 

 

Sincerely,

 

 

 

/s/ Julien R. Mininberg

 

 

 

Julien R. Mininberg

Chief Executive Officer

 

 



Table of Contents

 

 

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

 

HELEN OF TROY LIMITED

Clarendon House

2 Church Street

Hamilton, Bermuda

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD AUGUST 26, 201417, 2016

 

Notice is hereby given that the 20142016 Annual General Meeting of the Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Helen of Troy Limited, a Bermuda company (the “Company”), will be held at the Marriott Hotel 1600 Airway Blvd.,Indigo El Paso, 325 N. Kansas Street, El Paso, Texas 79901, on Tuesday,Wednesday, August 26, 2014,17, 2016, at 1:00 p.m., Mountain Daylight Time, for the following purposes:

 

1.                                      To set the number of Director positions at eight (or such lower number as shall equal the number of nominees elected as Directors) and elect the eight nominees to our Board of Directors;

 

2.                                      To provide advisory approval of the Company’s executive compensation;

 

3.                                      To approve nine proposals relating to the Company’s Amended and Restated Bye-laws;

4.To approve an amendment to the Helen of Troy Limited Amended and Restated 2011 Annual Incentive Plan;

 

4.5.                                      To appoint Grant Thornton LLP as the Company’s auditor and independent registered public accounting firm and to authorize the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to set the auditor’s remuneration; and

 

5.6.                                      To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

 

The record date for determining shareholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting is June 27, 2014.24, 2016. You are urged to read carefully the attached proxy statement for additional information concerning the matters to be considered at the Annual Meeting.

 

If you do not expect to be present in person at the Annual Meeting, please complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy and return it promptly in the enclosed postage-paid envelope that has been provided for your convenience. The prompt return of proxies will help ensure the presence of a quorum and save the Company the expense of further solicitation. Also, for your convenience, you can appoint your proxy via touch-tone telephone or internet at:

 

1-800-690-6903 or WWW.PROXYVOTE.COM

 

The proxy statement and the Company’s 20142016 Annual Report to Shareholders are also available on our hosted website at HTTP://MATERIALS.PROXYVOTE.COM/G4388N. For additional related information, please refer to the “Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials” in the enclosed proxy statement.

 

You are cordially invited and encouraged to attend the Annual Meeting in person.

 

 

/s/ Vincent D. Carson

 

Vincent D. Carson

Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

El Paso, Texas

July 14, 2014

 

IMPORTANT

 

WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO BE PRESENT AT THE ANNUAL MEETING, PLEASE SUBMIT YOUR PROXY AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.  IF YOU DO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, YOU MAY REVOKE YOUR PROXY AND VOTE IN PERSON.  MOST SHAREHOLDERS HAVE THREE OPTIONS FOR SUBMITTING THEIR PROXIES PRIOR TO THE ANNUAL MEETING: (1) VIA THE INTERNET, (2) BY PHONE OR (3) BY MARKING, DATING AND SIGNING THE ENCLOSED PROXY AND RETURNING IT IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED.  IF YOU HAVE INTERNET ACCESS, WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO APPOINT YOUR PROXY ON THE INTERNET. IT IS CONVENIENT, AND IT SAVES THE COMPANY SIGNIFICANT POSTAGE AND PROCESSING COSTS.

 



Table of Contents

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

Page

Proxy Statement Summary

1

Solicitation of Proxies

34

Voting Securities and Record Date

45

Quorum; Voting

45

Attending the Annual Meeting

56

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

56

Corporate Governance

89

Board Leadership and the Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

89

Board Committees and Meetings

1011

Shareholder Communications to the Board of Directors

1213

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

1213

Director Compensation

1314

Director Compensation for Fiscal Year 20142016

1314

Directors Fees Earned or Paid in Cash for Fiscal Year 20142016

1315

Director Stock Ownership and Compensation Guidelines

1415

Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan

1516

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

1617

Executive Officers

1718

Report of the Compensation Committee

1819

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

1920

Executive Compensation

4239

Summary Compensation Table

4239

All Other Compensation for Fiscal Year 20142016

4340

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 20142016

4441

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 20142016

4542

Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Fiscal Year 20142016

45

Employment and Separation Agreements of Former Chief Executive Officer and President

4643

Equity Compensation Plan Information

4944

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

5246

Compensation Risks

48

Certain Relationships - Related Person Transactions

5349

Audit Committee Matters

5349

Audit and Other Fees For Services Provided by Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

5550

Proposal 2: Advisory Approval of the Company’s Executive Compensation

5651

Proposal 3: Approval of Nine Proposals Relating to the Company’s Amended and Restated Bye-laws

52

Proposal 4: Approval of an Amendment to the Helen of Troy Limited Amended and Restated 2011 Annual Incentive Plan

5759

Proposal 4:5: Appointment of Auditor and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and Authorization of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to set the Auditor’s Remuneration

6062

Shareholder Proposals

6163

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

6163

Other Matters

6163

Householding of Materials

6163

Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

6163

Electronic Delivery of Shareholder Communications

6264

How to Obtain Our Annual Report, Proxy Statement and Other Information about the Company

6264

Appendix A: Helen of Troy Limited Amended and Restated 2011 Annual Incentive PlanBye-laws

A-1A

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

Proxy Statement Summary

 

Below are the highlights of important information you will find in this proxy statement. As it is only a summary, please review the complete proxy statement before you vote.

 

 

Helen of Troy Fiscal Year 20142016 Proxy Statement Highlights

 

Performance Highlights:

ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION:

The following events summarize our performance highlights for fiscal year 2014:

 

HOW TO VOTE:

You can vote by any of the following methods:

·      Via the internet by going to WWW.PROXYVOTE.COM and following the instructions at that website.

·      Via touch-tone telephone at 1-800-690-6903.

·      If you received a proxy card or voting instruction in the mail, by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the accompanying envelope as soon as possible.

·      If you plan to attend the meeting and wish to vote in person, you may revoke your proxy and vote in person at that time.

Date and Time:

Record Date:

Location:

August 17, 2016 at 1:00 PM,
Mountain Daylight Time

June 24, 2016

Hotel Indigo El Paso

325 N. Kansas Street

El Paso, Texas 79901

VOTING MATTERS:

Proposal

Voting
Recommendation
of the Board

·                  Set the number of Director positions at eight (or such lower number as shall equal the number of nominees elected as Directors) and elect the eight nominees to our Board of Directors

FOR

·                  Provide advisory approval of the Company’s executive compensation

FOR

·                  Approve nine proposals relating to the Company’s Amended and Restated Bye-laws

FOR

·                  Approve an amendment to the Helen of Troy Limited Amended and Restated 2011 Annual Incentive Plan

FOR

·                  Appoint Grant Thornton LLP as the Company’s auditor and independent registered public accounting firm and to authorize the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to set the auditor’s remuneration

FOR

BOARD NOMINEES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

Age

Director
Since

Independent
Director

Compensation
Committee

Audit
Committee

Nominating
Committee

Corporate
Governance
Committee

Julien R. Mininberg
Chief Executive Officer

51

2014

 

 

 

 

 

Timothy F. Meeker
Chairman

69

2004

ü

ü

 

Chair

 

Gary B. Abromovitz
Deputy Chairman

73

1990

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

John B. Butterworth

 

64

2002

ü

 

ü

 

 

Alexander M. Davern

 

49

2014

ü

 

Chair

 

ü

Beryl B. Raff

 

65

2014

ü

ü

ü

 

 

William F. Susetka

 

63

2009

ü

Chair

 

ü

 

Darren G. Woody

 

56

2004

ü

ü

 

ü

Chair

PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS:

The following events summarize our performance highlights for fiscal year 2016:

·We had cumulative total shareholder returns of 134157 percent and 550241 percent over the past three and five fiscal years, respectively, that exceed bothexceeded our Compensation Peer Group (as described on page 24), the NASDAQ Market Index (the “NASDAQ Market”) and the Dow Jones-U.S. Personal Products, Broad Market Cap, Yearly, and Total Return.Return Index (the “Industry Group”).

·                  Julien R. Mininberg was appointed as our new Chief Executive Officer effective March 1, 2014, implementing our Board’s succession plan.We had net revenue compound annual growth rates of 6.3 percent and 14.8 percent over the past three and five fiscal years, respectively.

·                  We expect to realize net savings in Chief Executive Officer compensation inhad cash flow from operations compound annual growth rates of 16.2 percent and 28.4 percent over the past three and five fiscal year 2015 of approximately $30.0 million (after giving effect to taxes), or $0.92 per fully diluted share, which is net of the Mr. Mininberg’s target compensation.years, respectively.

·Our Board authorized the repurchase of $550 million of our outstanding common shares in keeping with its stated intention to return to shareholders capital not otherwise deployed for strategic acquisitions. As part of that strategy, we completed a modified “Dutch auction” tender offer purchasing $245.6 million of our common shares in March 2014.

Over the past three and five fiscal year periods, we have outperformed our peer group index, the NASDAQ Market Index and the Dow Jones-U.S. Personal Products, Broad Market Cap, Yearly, and Total Return Index, in terms of total shareholder return.

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

 

 

1GRAPHIC

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE:



Table of Contents

 

Corporate Governance:

We are committed to a corporate governance approach that ensures mutually beneficial results for the Company and its shareholders. In pursuit of this approach, we have implemented the following policies:

 

·                  In January 2014, the Company separated theWe maintain separate roles offor Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

·                  We require majority voting for all Directors and annual elections for each Director.Directors.

·                  We require annual election for all Directors.

·Our Nominating Committee’s policy is to review director qualifications and skill sets in order to keepmaintain a balance between refreshed and seasoned Directors with knowledge of the Board refreshed.Company’s business. Consistent with that objective, our Board has nominated two directors for election at the 2014 annual general meeting, Ms. Beryl Raff and Mr. Alexander Davern, and Ms. Beryl Raff, who havehad not previously served on the Board.

·                  We maintain stock retention guidelines for both our Directorsdirectors and executive officers further aligning Directorsthem with our shareholders.

·                  We require independent Directorsdirectors to meet in executive session without management present in connection withat every regular Board meeting and throughout the year as needed.

·                  The Board of Directors periodically evaluates the rotation of committee chairs.

Executive Compensation Achievements:

At the 2013 annual general meeting, our shareholders voted against the compensation of our named executive officers described in our 2013 proxy statement.  In connection with the 2013 say on pay vote, the Compensation Committee obtained feedback from our shareholders and engaged an independent compensation consultant.  The paramount concern of our shareholders was the level of compensation and other pay practices relating to our former Chief Executive Officer.  As a result, the Compensation Committee has made a number of significant changes to the compensation program of our new Chief Executive Officer. Some of the more important actions include the following:

TopicEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION FEATURES:

Overall, our executive compensation program emphasizes performance- and equity-based compensation to align it with shareholder interests and includes other practices that we believe serve shareholder interests such as paying for performance, not providing tax “gross-up” payments and maintaining policies relating to clawbacks of incentive awards and prohibitions on hedging or pledging Company stock. Important features of our executive compensation program include the following:

Feature

ActionTerms

Benchmarking; Market Compensation Levels

·        Adopted a newSet the compensation program forof our Chief Executive Officer that addresses shareholder concerns and substantially reduces total compensation. The Chief Executive Officer’s total compensation was benchmarked at what the Compensation Committee believes is a market level comparedusing a benchmark peer group of similarly situated companies against which to peers.compare and assess the Company’s compensation program and performance.

Refocused

Rigorous Performance Metrics

·        Established more rigorous performance goals based on multiple metrics that are not duplicative between short-term and long-term incentive awards.

Adopted Stock Ownership Guidelines

Long-Term Incentives

·        Adopted stock retention guidelinesEstablished multi-year performance periods for our executive officers tied to a multiple of their annual salaries,long-term incentive awards, with a five year period to reach the required ownership.minimum vesting periods for Company equity grants.

Substantially Reduced Severance to Chief Executive Officer

·Substantially decreased any severance owed to our Chief Executive Officer upon a termination of employment.

Overall, our executive compensation program as currently in effect heavily emphasizes performance- and equity-based compensation to align it with shareholder interests, and includes other practices that we believe serve shareholder interests such as paying for performance, not providing tax “gross-up” payments, providing limited perquisites, adopting plan provisions relating to clawbacks of incentive awards and maintaining policies prohibiting the hedging or pledging our Company’s stock.

 

2



Table of Contents

HELEN OF TROY LIMITED

 

Clarendon House

2 Church Street

Hamilton, Bermuda

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

August 26, 201417, 2016

 

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

 

The accompanying proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of Helen of Troy Limited (the “Company”) for use at its Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held atin the Marriott Hotel 1600 Airway Blvd.,Indigo El Paso, 325 N. Kansas Street, El Paso, Texas 79901 on Tuesday,Wednesday, August 26, 2014,17, 2016, at 1:00 p.m., Mountain Daylight Time, and at any adjournment thereof, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. A proxy may be revoked by filing a written notice of revocation or an executed proxy bearing a later date with the Secretary of our Company any time before exercise of the proxy or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. The proxy statements and form of proxy cards are to be distributed to shareholders on or about July 14, 2014.15, 2016.

 

If you complete and submit your proxy, the persons named as proxies will vote the shares represented by your proxy in accordance with your instructions. If you submit a proxy card but do not fill out the voting instructions on the proxy card, the persons named as proxies will vote the shares represented by your proxy as follows:

 

·                  FOR setting the number of Director positions at eight (or such lower number as shall equal the number of nominees elected as Directors) and electing the eight nominees to the Board of Directors, as set forth in Proposal 1.

 

·                  FOR the advisory approval of the Company’s executive compensation, as set forth in Proposal 2.

 

·                  FOR, the approval of nine proposals relating to the Company’s Amended and Restated Bye-laws, as set forth in Proposals 3A through 3I.

·FOR, the approval of an amendment to the Helen of Troy Limited Amended and Restated 2011 Annual Incentive Plan, as set forth in Proposal 3.4.

 

·                  FOR the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as the auditor and independent registered public accounting firm of the Company and to authorize the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to set the auditor’s remuneration, as set forth in Proposal 4.5.

 

In addition, if other matters are properly presented for voting at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof, the persons named as proxies will vote on such matters in accordance with their judgment. We have not received notice of other matters that may properly be presented for voting at the Annual Meeting. Your vote is important. If you do not vote your shares, you will not have a say in the important issues to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting. To pass, each proposal included in this year’s proxy statement requires an affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on such proposal at the Annual Meeting. To ensure that your vote is recorded promptly, please submit your proxy as soon as possible, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person.

 

The Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended February 28, 201429, 2016 (“fiscal year 2014”2016”), including financial statements, is enclosed. It does not form any part of the material provided for the solicitation of proxies.

 

The cost of solicitation of proxies will be borne by the Company.  In addition to solicitation by mail, officers and employees of the Company may solicit the return of proxies by telephone, facsimile, electronic mail, personal interview, and other methods of communication.  The Company has also retained AST Phoenix Advisors to aid in the solicitation of proxies by mail, telephone, facsimile, electronic mail and personal solicitation.  For these services, the Company will pay a fee of $13,000 plus reimbursement for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.

 

We will request brokerage houses and other nominees, fiduciaries and custodians to forward soliciting materials to beneficial owners of the Company’s common shares, par value $0.10 per share (the “Common Stock”), for which we will, upon request, reimburse the forwarding expense.

3



Table of Contents

VOTING SECURITIES AND RECORD DATE

 

The close of business on June 27, 2014,24, 2016, is the record date for determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. As of June 27, 2014,24, 2016, there were 28,368,176[] shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding, each entitled to one vote per share.

 

QUORUM; VOTING

 

Shareholders may hold their shares either as a “shareholder of record” or as a “street name” holder.  If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, you are considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares and this proxy statement is being sent directly to you by the Company. If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by another nominee, you are considered to be the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and these proxy materials, together with a voting instruction card, are being forwarded to you by your broker, trustee or other nominee. As the beneficial owner of the shares, you have the right to direct your broker, trustee or other nominee how to vote.

 

The presence in person of two or more persons, representing throughout the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, at least a majority of the issued shares of Common Stock entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Proxies marked as “Withhold Authority” on the election of Directors will be treated as present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining the quorum.

 

Abstentions and broker non-votes are also counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present. “Broker non-votes” occur when shares held in street name by a broker or nominee are represented at the Annual Meeting, but such broker or nominee is not empowered to vote those shares on a particular proposal because the broker has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner.

 

Under the rules that govern brokers who are voting with respect to shares held by them in a street name, if the broker has not been furnished with voting instructions by its client at least ten days before the meeting, those brokers have the discretion to vote such shares on routine matters, but not on non-routine matters. Routine matters include the appointment of the auditor and related matters, submitted to the shareholders in Proposal 4.5. Non-routine matters include the election of Directors submitted to shareholders in Proposal 1, the advisory approval of the Company’s executive compensation submitted to shareholders in Proposal 2, the approval of nine proposals relating to the Company’s Amended and Restated Bye-laws submitted to the shareholders in Proposals 3A through 3I, and the approval of an amendment to the Helen of Troy Limited Amended and Restated 2011 Annual Incentive Plan submitted to the shareholders in Proposal 3.4. As a result, with regard to Proposals 1 2 and 3,through 4, brokers have no discretion to vote shares where no voting instructions are received, and no vote will be cast if you do not vote on that proposal. We therefore urge you to vote on ALL voting items.

 

If a quorum is present, each nominee for Director receiving a majority of the votes cast (the number of shares voted “for” a director nominee must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that nominee) at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy shall be elected.  The affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy shall also be the act of the shareholders with respect to Proposals 3 and 4.through 5. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not counted in determining the total number of votes cast and will have no effect with respect to any of the proposals because abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered to be votes cast under the applicable laws of Bermuda.

 

The advisory vote on executive compensation is non-binding. Although the vote is non-binding, the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors will review and carefully consider the outcome of the advisory vote to approve the Company’s executive compensation and those opinions when making future decisions regarding executive compensation programs. Notwithstanding the advisory nature of the vote, the resolution in Proposal 2 will be considered passed with the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy.

 

If within half an hour from the time appointed for the Annual Meeting a quorum is not present in person or by proxy, the Annual Meeting shall stand adjourned to the same day one week later, at the same time and place or to such other day, time or place the Board of Directors may determine, provided that at least two persons are present at such adjourned meeting, representing throughout the meeting, in person or by proxy, at least a majority of the issued shares of Common Stock entitled to vote. At any such adjourned meeting at which a quorum is present or represented, any business may be transacted that might have been transacted at the Annual Meeting as originally called.

4



Table of Contents

ATTENDING THE ANNUAL MEETING

 

A person is entitled to attend the Annual Meeting only if that person was a shareholder or joint shareholder as of the close of business on the record date or that person holds a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting. If you hold your shares in street name and desire to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting, you must provide a signed proxy directly from the holder of record giving you the right to vote the shares or a letter from the broker or nominee appointing you as their proxy. The proxy card enclosed with this proxy statement is not sufficient to satisfy this requirement. If you hold your shares in street name and desire to attend the Annual Meeting, you must also provide proof of beneficial ownership on the record date, such as your most recent account statement prior to the record date or other similar evidence of ownership. If you are the shareholder of record or hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting, your name or the name of the person on whose behalf you are proxy must be verified against the Company’s list of shareholders of record on the record date as shown on the list of shareholders of the Company prior to being admitted to and prior to voting at the Annual Meeting. All shareholders must, if requested by representatives of the Company, present photo identification for admittance. If you do not provide photo identification or comply with the other procedures outlined above upon request, you will not be admitted to the Annual Meeting and/or will not be permitted to vote, as applicable.

 

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

The bye-laws of the Company state that the number of our Directors shall be established by the shareholders from time to time but shall not be less than two. The Company currently has seveneight members who serve on the Board of Directors. The Nominating Committee has nominated eight candidates for election to the Board of Directors. Accordingly, the Board of Directors recommends that the number of Director positions be set at eight. In the event that less than eight Directors are elected, then the number of Director positions set shall not be eight, but instead shall equal the number of Directors actually elected.

 

The eight persons named below are the nominees for election as Directors. Each nominee has consented to serve as a Director if elected. One of the eight candidates, Julien R. Mininberg, is the Company’s newly appointed Chief Executive Officer. The Board of Directors has determined that the remaining seven candidates, Gary B. Abromovitz, John B. Butterworth, Alexander M. Davern, Timothy F. Meeker, Beryl B. Raff, William F. Susetka, and Darren G. Woody are independent Directors as defined in the applicable listing standards for companies traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”). Therefore, the majority of persons nominated to serve on our Board of Directors are independent as so defined. Each Director elected shall serve as a Director until the next annual general meeting of shareholders or until his or her successor is elected or appointed.

 

Nominees for the Election of Directors

 

Set forth below are descriptions of the business experience of the nominees for election to our Board of Directors as well as their qualifications:

 

GARY B. ABROMOVITZ, age 71,73, has been a Director of the Company since 1990. He is Deputy Chairman of the Board and Chairmanduring his tenure has served as Chair of both the Compensation, CommitteeNominating, Governance, and the Nominating Committee.Audit Committees. He alsocurrently serves as a member of each of those Committees and chairs the executive sessions of the independent Directors and serves as a member of the Audit Committee and the Corporate Governance Committee.Directors. Mr. Abromovitz is ana retired attorney and has acted as a consultant to several law firms in business related matters, including trade secrets, unfair competition and commercial litigation.matters. He also has been active for more than thirty years in various real estate development and acquisition transactions involving industrial buildings, medical offices and commercial, residential and historic properties.transactions. Until August 10, 2012, Mr. Abromovitz served as a Director of Cardio Vascular Bio Therapeutics, Inc.

 

Mr. Abromovitz possesses an in-depth knowledge of the history and operations of the Company and provides the Board with a significant leadership role as Deputy Chairman as well as Chairmanand an in-depth knowledge of the Compensation Committeehistory and operations of the Nominating Committee.Company. He also has a significantdeep understanding of corporate governance and compensation guidelines, as well as experience managing board affairs. Further, Mr. Abromovitz’s background and skill sets as an attorney and his practical business experience provides a unique perspective to the Board.

 

JOHN B. BUTTERWORTH, age 62,64, has been a Director of the Company since 2002. Mr. Butterworth is a Certified Public Accountant and a shareholder in the public accounting firm of Weatherley, Butterworth, Macias & Graves P.C. located in El Paso, Texas. Mr. Butterworth has thirty-fivethirty-seven years of certified public accounting experience and has been a member of the Company’s Audit Committee for the last twelvethirteen years.

 

5



Table of Contents

Mr. Butterworth has valuable accounting and tax expertise. Additionally, Mr. Butterworth has gained a deep understanding of the Company’s business that enables him to provide significant insights regarding the Company’s financial and accounting related matters. He brings strategic focus to our Board of Directors and has provided leadership and guidance that have helped drive the Company’s growth.

ALEXANDER M. DAVERN, age 47, is a new nominee49, was elected to theour Board of Directors.Directors in August 2014 and chairs the Audit Committee. He also serves as a member of the Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Davern joined National Instruments Corp., a producer of automated test equipment and application software, in February 1994. Since 2010, he has served as Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President. From 2002 to 2010, he served as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Information Technology and Manufacturing Operations. From 1997 to 2002, he was the Chief Financial Officer of National Instruments. Prior to joining National Instruments, Mr. Davern worked both in Europe and in the United States for the international accounting firm of Price Waterhouse, LLP. From 2003 to 2008, Mr. Davern also served on the Board of Directors and as Audit Committee Chairman of Sigma Tel, Inc., a semiconductor manufacturer. In March 2015, Mr. Davern joined the Board of Directors of Cirrus Logic, Inc., a publically traded semiconductor manufacturer. Mr. Davern received a Bachelor’s of Commerce degree and a postgraduate diploma in professional accounting from University College in Dublin, Ireland.

 

Mr. Davern brings broad experience in business strategy, operations, global accounting, information technology, auditing, and SEC reporting matters. In addition, his experience as a public company executive and director contributes to his knowledge of corporate governance and public company matters.

 

TIMOTHY F. MEEKER, age 67,69, has been a Director of the Company since 2004. EffectiveIn January 14, 2014, Mr. Meeker was appointed as Chairman of the Board. Mr. Meeker is also Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee.  He alsoNominating Committee and serves as a member of the Compensation and Nominating Committees.Committee. Since 2002, Mr. Meeker has served as President and principal in Meeker and Associates, a privately-held management consulting firm. Mr. Meeker served as Senior Vice President, Sales & Customer Development for Bristol-Myers Squibb, a consumer products and pharmaceutical company, from 1996 through 2002.  From 1989 to 1996, Mr. Meeker served as Vice President of Sales for Bristol-Myers’ Clairol Division.

 

Mr. Meeker has over thirty-sixthirty-eight years of experience in the consumer products industry resulting in extensive general management experience with responsibilities for sales, distribution, finance, human resources, customer service and facilities.  In addition, he has a valued perspective on operational matters that is an asset to the Board of Directors.  Mr. Meeker has served as a chairman of the National Association of Chain Drug Stores advisory committee, which allows him to bring an extensive understanding of retail mass market sales and marketing to our Board of Directors.

 

JULIEN R. MININBERG, age 49, succeeded Gerald J. Rubin51, has served as our Chief Executive Officer effective March 1, 2014.  On March 25, 2014,and a member of the Board appointed him to serve as a Director of the Company, filling the vacancy created by the resignation of Mr. Rubin as a Director.since March 2014.  Prior to his appointment as CEO, Mr. Mininberg had served as the Chief Executive Officer of Kaz Inc. (“Kaz”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company since December 2010. Kaz comprises the Healthcare /Health & Home Environment segment of the Company, which is the Company’s largest and most global business segment. Mr. Mininberg joined Kaz in 2006 serving as Chief Marketing Officer and was appointed President in September 2007, where he served until he was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Kaz in September 2010. Before joining Kaz, Mr. Mininberg worked 15 years at Procter & Gamble Co. (“P&G”), where he spent an equal amount of time in the United States and Latin America serving in a variety of marketing and general management capacities. In the U.S., he worked in brand management, serving as Brand Manager in P&G’s Health Care division. He was promoted to Marketing Director in 1997 and transferred to Latin America, where he served in the Fabric & Home Care division before being promoted to Country Manager for P&G’s Home Care business in Latin America. In 2003, he became Country Manager for Central America overseeing all P&G business in that region. Mr. Mininberg earned his Bachelor’s degree and MBA from Yale University. He currently serves on the Board of Advisors for Yale School of Management and isserves as Past President of its global Alumni Association Board of Directors.

 

Mr. Mininberg brings a 25-year27-year track record of building market-leading multinational brands and organizations, a strategic mindset, operational expertise, and seasoned leadership skills. As our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Mininberg provides essential oversight of the business and organization, and a link between management and the BoardBoard. Mr. Mininberg has extensive experience in global brand building, and general management and leading multi-national organizations. He plays a key role in communication with shareholders and leading the Company’s acquisition activities. Additionally, he provides crucial insight to the Board on the Company’s strategic planning and operations.

 

BERYL B. RAFF, age 63, is a new nominee65, was elected to theour Board of Directors.Directors in August 2014 and serves as a member of the Audit and Compensation Committees. Since April 2009, Ms. Raff has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Helzberg Diamond Shops Inc., a  retail and online jewelry retailer and a wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc.  From 2005 through April 2009, she served as Executive Vice President-General Merchandise Manager for the fine jewelry division of J.C. Penney Company, Inc., a retailer of apparel and home furnishings.  From 2001

6



Table of Contents

through 2005, Ms. Raff served as Senior Vice President-General Merchandise Manager for the fine jewelry division of J.C. Penney.  Prior to joining J.C. Penney, Beryl served in various leadership roles of Zale Corporation, a national retail jewelry chain, last serving as its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Since June 2007, Ms. Raff has served on the Board of Directors of Group 1 Automotive, Inc., an automotive retail operator, and serves as a member of its Compensation Committee and Chairman of the Governance/Nomination Committee from 2007 to 2015. Since September 2014, Ms. Raff has served on the Board of Directors of The Michaels Stores, Inc., a national retail chain of arts and crafts specialty stores, and is a member of its Audit Committee. In 2015, Ms. Raff also joined the board of Larry H. Miller Group, an auto dealership, sports and entertainment company, where she serves on the

Compensation and Nomination & Governance committees.  Ms. Raff serves on the Advisory Board of Jewelers Circular Keystone, a trade publication and industry authority, and as Chairman ofon the Board of the Jewelers Vigilance Committee, a non-profit organization focused on legal and regulatory issues facing the jewelry industry. Ms. Raff is alsohas previously served as a Director of the NACD Heartland Chapter, a non-profit organization dedicated to excellence in board leadership. From 2001 through February 2011, Ms. Raff served on the Board of Directors, the Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee (which she chaired from 2008 to 2011) of Jo-Ann Stores, Inc., a national specialty retailer of craft, sewing and decorating products.  Ms. Raff graduated from Boston University with a Bachelor of Business Administration degree and from Drexel University with a Masters of Business Administration.

 

Ms. Raff is well known throughout the retail industry and brings to the Board of Directors her experience and perspective as an outstanding merchant and multi-store retail executive. The Board expects to benefit from Ms. Raff’s extensive knowledge of the retail industry and her valuable insight on how we can best serve our retail partners. Ms. Raff’s current and previous service on other boards also provides important perspectives on key corporate governance matters.

 

WILLIAM F. SUSETKA, age 61,63, has been a Director of the Company since 2009, and2009. In August 2014, Mr. Susetka was appointed as Chairman of the Compensation Committee. He also serves as a member of the Compensation Committee and AuditNominating Committee.  Mr. Susetka spent thirty years in marketing and senior management for Clairol, Inc. and Avon Products, Inc. From 1999 to 2001, Mr. Susetka was President of the Clairol U.S. Retail Division, with additional responsibility for worldwide research and development and manufacturing. From 2002 through 2005, Mr. Susetka was President of Global Marketing at Avon Products, Inc. where he led worldwide marketing, advertising and research and development and served on Avon’s Executive Committee. Prior to 1999, he held positions as President of the Clairol International Division and Vice President/General Manager for the Clairol Professional Products Division.  He served as a Board Member of the Cosmetics, Toiletry and Fragrance Association from 1999 to 2005 and as a member of the Avon Foundation Board from 2004 to 2005. From October 2005 to January 2006, Mr. Susetka was Chief Operating Officer of Nice Pak Products, Inc., a manufacturer of private labeled pre-moistened wipes and other antiseptic wipes. From 2007 through May 2009, he served as Chief Marketing Officer for the LPGA (Ladies Professional Golf Association). In September 2015, Mr. Susetka currently servescompleted a six-year term on the LPGA Board of Directors.

 

Mr. Susetka provides a wealth of global consumer products industry experience and valuable insight to the Board of Directors.  Mr. Susetka is also instrumental in helping to monitor and adjust the strategic direction of the Company’s Grooming, Skin Care, and Hair Care products category, provides general guidance regarding consumer brand strategy to the Company’s other product categories, and consulting on related matters to senior management.

 

DARREN G. WOODY, age 54,56, has been a Director of the Company since 2004,2004. Mr. Woody chairs the Corporate Governance Committee and also serves as a member of the Compensation Committee, the Corporate Governance Committee and the Nominating Committee.Committees. Mr. Woody is President and Chief Executive Officer of Jordan Foster Construction, LLC, an investment entity and a construction firm with offices in Austin, Dallas, El Paso, Houston, and San Antonio, Texas and field operations throughout the United States. The firm specializes in military, commercial, multi-family, and highway construction. He has served in this capacity since August of 2000. Previously, Mr. Woody was a partner in the law firm of Krafsur, Gordon, Mott, Davis and Woody P.C., where he specialized in real estate, business acquisitions and complex financing arrangements.

 

Mr. Woody brings a multi-disciplined perspective to our Board of Directors given his executive leadership and legal experience. This background enables him to provide oversight with regard to many of the Company’s legal matters, significant transactional negotiations and the management of challenging complex projects.

Vote Required for Approval and Recommendation

 

The receipt of a majority of the votes cast (the number of shares voted “for” a director nominee exceeding the number of votes cast “against” that nominee) at the Annual Meeting is required to set the number of Director positions at eight (or such lower number as shall equal the number of nominees elected as Directors) and to elect each of the eight nominees for Director.  In the event that any of the Company’s nominees are unable to serve, proxies will be voted for the substitute nominee or nominees designated by our Board of Directors, or will be voted to fix the number of Directors at fewer than eight and for fewer than eight nominees, as the Board may deem advisable in its discretion.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE EIGHT NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.

7



Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

Corporate Governance. Corporate governance is typically defined as the system that allocates duties and authority among a company’s shareholders, Board of Directors and management. The shareholders elect the Board and vote on extraordinary matters.

 

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, as well as our Code of Ethics, and the charters of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating Committee, and Corporate Governance Committee are available under the “Corporate Governance” heading of the investor relations page of our website at the following address: http://www.hotus.comWWW.HOTUS.COM.

 

Our Company believes that it is in compliance with the corporate governance requirements of the NASDAQ listing standards.  The principal elements of these governance requirements as implemented by our Company are:

 

·                  affirmative determination by the Board of Directors that a majority of the Directors are independent;

 

·                  regularly scheduled executive sessions of independent Directors;

 

·                  Audit Committee, Nominating Committee and Compensation Committee comprised of independent Directors and having the purposes and charters described below under the separate committee headings; and

 

·                  specific Audit Committee responsibility, authority and procedures outlined in the charter of the Audit Committee.

 

Independence. The Board of Directors has determined that the following directors and nominees for election at the Annual Meeting are independent Directors as defined in the NASDAQ listing standards: Gary B. Abromovitz, John B. Butterworth, Alexander M. Davern, Timothy F. Meeker, Beryl B. Raff, William F. Susetka Adolpho R. Telles and Darren G. Woody. Approximately 88 percentOther than Julien R. Mininberg, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, each member of the Board, including all the persons nominated to serve on our Company’s Board of Directors, are independent as so defined. The foregoing independence determination of our Board of Directors included the determination that each of these seven nominated Board members, if elected and appointed to the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee or Nominating Committee, or as discussed above, respectively, is:

 

·                  independent for purposes of membership on the Audit Committee under Rule 5605(c)(2) of the NASDAQ listing standards, that includes the independence requirements of Rule 5605(a)(2) and additional independence requirements under SEC Rule 10A-3(b);

 

·                  independent under the NASDAQ listing standards for purposes of membership on the Nominating Committee; and

 

·                  independent under the NASDAQ listing standards for purposes of membership on the Compensation Committee, as a “non-employee director” under SEC Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and an “outside director” as defined in regulations under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

 

BOARD LEADERSHIP AND THE BOARD’S ROLE IN RISK OVERSIGHT

 

Separation of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Roles.

 

EffectiveIn January 14, 2014, the Board separated the roles of the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer in order to further diversify and strengthen its leadership structure. We separated these roles in recognition of the differences between the two roles and the value to our companyCompany of having the distinct and different perspectives and experiences of a separate Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Our Chief Executive Officer is responsible for the day-to-day management and supervision of the business and affairs of our companyCompany (such as reviewing performance and allocating resources as the company’sCompany’s chief operating decision maker) and for ensuring that the directives of the Board are carried into effect. Our Chairman, on the other hand, is charged with presiding over all meetings of the Board and our shareholders, and providing advice and counsel to the Chief Executive Officer and our Company’s other officers regarding our business and operations, as well as focusing on oversight and governance matters.

 

8



Table of Contents

By separating the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, our Chief Executive Officer is able to focus his time and energy on managing the Company’s complex daily operations, while our Chairman can devote his time and attention to addressing matters relating to the responsibilities of our Board. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman have an excellent working relationship, and, with more than 36thirty-eight years of experience in the consumer products industry, our Chairman is well positioned to provide our Chief Executive Officer with guidance, advice, and counsel regarding our company’sCompany’s business, operations and strategy.

Moreover, we believe that having a separate Chairman focused on oversight and governance matters allows the Board to more effectively perform its risk oversight role as described below. In connection with the Board’s self-evaluation process, as required by our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board evaluates its organization and processes to ensure that the Board is functioning effectively.  For the foregoing reasons, we believe that our separate Chief Executive Officer/Chairman structure is the most appropriate and effective leadership structure for our companyCompany and our shareholders.

 

Deputy Chairman

 

The Deputy Chairman’s authority and responsibilities include presiding at all meetings of the Board when the Chairman is not present, presiding over all executive sessions of the independent Directors and interacting with committee Chairs to efficiently address Board issues for presentation at Board meetings. The Deputy Chairman also consults with the Chairman regarding Board agendas and outreach to shareholders.

 

Executive Sessions

 

Independent Directors regularly meet without management present. In regard to executive sessions, any independent Director has the authority to call meetings of independent Directors.

 

The Board’s Role on Risk Oversight

 

The Company’s management is responsible for the ongoing assessment and management of the risks the Company faces, including risks relating to capital structure, strategy, liquidity and credit, financial reporting and public disclosure, operations, and governance. The Board oversees management’s policies and procedures in addressing these and other risks.  Additionally, each of the Board’s four committees (the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating Committee, and Corporate Governance Committee) monitor and report to the Board those risks that fall within the scope of such committees’committee’s area of oversight responsibility. For example, the full Board directly oversees strategic risks. The Nominating Committee directly oversees risk management relating to Director nomination and independence. The Corporate Governance Committee directly oversees risk management regarding corporate governance. The Compensation Committee directly oversees risk management relating to employee compensation, including any risks of compensation programs encouraging excessive risk-taking. Finally, the Audit Committee directly oversees risk management relating to financial reporting, public disclosure and legal and regulatory compliance.  The Audit Committee is also responsible for assessing the steps management has taken to monitor and control these risks and exposures and discussing guidelines and policies with respect to the Company’s risk assessment and risk management.

 

Management has identified risks, designated associated “risk owners” within the organization and receives appropriate reports from the various risk owners as conditions change. Management works with the Board to communicate risk factors to the Board and to enable the Board to understand the Company’s risk identification, risk management and risk mitigation measures relating to strategic matters. Additional review or reporting of risks is conducted by management as needed or when requested by the Board or a committee. Additionally, the Chairman and Deputy Chairman, working with the Audit Committee and the Corporate Governance Committee, assess corporate governance practices and risks. The Corporate Governance Committee periodically assesses the effectiveness of the Company’s corporate governance policies in light of the applicable listing standards and laws and reports their findings to the Board.

9



Table of Contents

BOARD COMMITTEES AND MEETINGS

 

Our Board of Directors has four committees: the Audit Committee, the Nominating Committee, the Corporate Governance Committee, and the Compensation Committee. The Independent Directors listed in the table below also meet in executive sessions without management present. The following table shows the composition of these committees as of February 28, 201429, 2016 and the number of meetings held during fiscal year 2014:2016:

 

Director

Executive
Sessions of
Independent
Directors

Audit

Nominating

Corporate
Governance

Compensation

Executive
Sessions of
Independent
Directors

Compensation
Committee

Audit
Committee

Nominating
Committee

Corporate
Governance
Committee

Gary B. Abromovitz

Chair

M

Chair

M

Chair

Chair

M

M

M

M

John B. Butterworth

M

 

 

 

M

 

M

 

 

Alexander M. Davern

M

 

Chair

 

M

Timothy F. Meeker

M

 

M

Chair

M

M

M

 

Chair

 

Beryl B. Raff

M

M

M

 

 

William F. Susetka

M

 

 

M

M

Chair

 

M

 

Adolpho R. Telles

M

Chair

 

 

 

Darren G. Woody

M

 

M

M

M

M

M

 

M

Chair

Number of Meetings Held in Fiscal Year 2014

7

8

5

4

9

Number of Meetings Held in Fiscal Year 2016

4

7

7

2

1

 


M = Member during fiscal year 2014.as of February 29, 2016


 

Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee is established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act.  The Audit Committee operates under a written charter that has been adopted by the Board of Directors. The primary purposes of this committee are to oversee, on behalf of the Company’s Board of Directors: (1) the accounting and financial reporting processes and integrity of our Company’s financial statements, (2) the audits of our Company’s financial statements and the appointment, compensation, qualifications, independence, and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm, (3) our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and (4) the staffing and ongoing operation of our internal audit function. The Audit Committee meets periodically with our Chief Financial Officer and other appropriate officers in the discharge of its duties. The Audit Committee also reviews the content and enforcement of the Company’s Code of Ethics, consults with legal counsel on various legal compliance matters and on other legal matters if those matters could materially affect our financial statements.

 

The Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is independent as previously described. In addition, the Board of Directors determined that Adolpho TellesAlexander M. Davern qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. The Board of Directors has also determined that nominee Alexander M. Davern qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert.” Additionally, the Board of Directors determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee meet the requirement of the NASDAQ listing standards that each member be able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company’s balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement.

 

Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter that has been adopted by the Board of Directors. The primary purposes of the committee are to (1) evaluate and approve the corporate goals and objectives set by the Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”), (2) evaluate the CEO’s performance in light of those goals and objectives, (3) make recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to non-CEO compensation, incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans, (4) oversee the administration of our incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans, and (5) produce an annual report on executive compensation for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement. The Board of Directors has determined that the members of this committee are independent as previously described. In addition to formal meetings, the committee also conducted numerous informal telephonic discussions and consulted its legal advisors throughout the year. The Compensation Committee has the independent authority to hire compensation, accounting, legal, or other advisors. Since fiscal year 2011, theThe Compensation Committee has retained Pearl Meyer & Partners (“Pearl Meyer”) as its independent compensation consultant.consultant to assist in the evaluation of the compensation packages of our Chief Executive Officer and the other named executive officers for fiscal year 2015. Pearl Meyer worksworked directly with the Compensation Committee (and not on behalf of management) to assist the Compensation Committee in meeting its responsibilities.  During fiscal year 2014, Pearl Meyer assisted the Compensation Committee in connection with an analysis ofanalyze the compensation received by our named executive

10



Table of Contents

officers, includingand assisted in establishing a peer group foron which a benchmarking study could be conducted and assisting in evaluating shareholder feedback in connectionwas conducted. In April 2015, the Compensation Committee engaged Frederic W. Cook & Company (“FW Cook”) as its independent compensation consultant to assist the

Compensation Committee with the 2013 say on pay vote.  Pearl Meyer also helped evaluate the newits compensation decisions for our named executive officers for fiscal year 2015 compensation packages of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers.  2017. The Compensation Committee has determined that neither Pearl Meyer has nonor FW Cook had any conflicts of interest relating to its engagement by the Compensation Committee.

 

Nominating Committee. The Nominating Committee operates under a written charter that has been adopted by the Board of Directors. The primary purposes of the Nominating committee are to (1) recommend to our Board of Directors individuals qualified to serve on our Board of Directors for election by shareholders at each annual general meeting of shareholders and to fill vacancies on the Board of Directors, and (2) implement the Board’s criteria for selecting new Directors. The Nominating Committee also oversees the evaluation of the Board members and seeks to annually review Director qualifications and skill sets with the goal of maintaining fresh perspectives on the Board. The Nominating Committee receives recommendations from its members, other members of the Board of Directors, outside advisors, and consultants for candidates to be considered for the Board. The Nominating Committee receives recommendations from its members or other members of the Board of Directors for candidates to be appointed to committee positions, reviews and evaluates such candidates and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors for nominations to fill or add committee positions.

 

The Nominating Committee’s current process for identifying and evaluating nominees for Director positions consists of general periodic evaluations of the size and composition of the Board of Directors, applicable listing standards and laws, and other appropriate factors with a goal of maintaining continuity of appropriate industry expertise and knowledge of our Company.  With respect to the new Director nominees for the Annual Meeting, the Nominating Committee also engaged a search firm specializing in Director recruiting to aid in identifying and evaluating potential Director candidates. The Nominating Committee looks for a number of personal attributes in selecting candidates as specified in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines including: sound reputation and ethical conduct; business and professional activities that are complementary to those of the Company; the availability of time and a willingness to carry out their duties and responsibilities effectively; an active awareness of changes in the social, political and economic landscape; an absence of any conflicts of interest; a level of health that allows for attendance and active contribution to most Board and committee meetings; limited service on other boards; and a commitment to contribute to the Company’s overall performance, placing it above personal interests. The Nominating Committee does not have a diversity policy regarding its selection criteria for determining Director nominees. However, as specified in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Nominating Committee makes efforts to maintain members on the Board who have substantial and direct experience in areas of importance to the Company. Additionally, the Nominating Committee seeks independent Directors who represent a mix of backgrounds and experiences that will enhance the quality of the Board’s deliberations and decisions.  The Nominating Committee considers all attributes, business diversity, professional qualifications, and experience of all candidates the committee believes will benefit the Company and increase shareholder value, without regard to gender, race or ethnic background. The Nominating Committee does not assign specific weights to particular criteria, and no particular criterion is necessarily applicable to all prospective nominees.

 

The Nominating Committee will consider candidates recommended by shareholders. Written suggestions for candidates by shareholders should be delivered for consideration by the Nominating Committee to the Secretary of the Company, Clarendon House, 2 Church Street, Hamilton, Bermuda. Written suggestions for candidates should be accompanied by a written consent of the proposed candidate to serve as a Director if nominated and elected, a description of his or her qualifications and other relevant biographical information. The Nominating Committee may request that the shareholder submitting the proposed nominee furnish additional information to determine the eligibility and qualifications of such candidate. Additionally, any candidate recommended by shareholders must meet the same general requirements outlined in the previous paragraph to be considered for election. Any shareholder recommendation will be considered for nomination as a Director at the sole discretion of the Nominating Committee. Neither the Board of Directors nor the Nominating Committee is required to include any shareholder nominee recommendation as a proposal in the proxy statement and proxy card mailed to shareholders. Our Company did not receive any such Director nominee recomendationsrecommendations for the Annual Meeting.

 

In addition, Section 79 of the Companies Act 1981 provides that (i) any number of shareholders representing not less than 5 percent of the total voting power of the shares eligible to vote at a general meeting of shareholders, or (ii) not less than 100 shareholders may propose any resolution which may properly be moved at the next annual general meeting of shareholders. Upon timely receipt of a requisition and compliance with Section 79, we will, at the expense of such shareholder(s), give our other shareholders entitled to receive notice of the next annual general meeting of shareholders

11



Table of Contents

notice of the proposed resolution. To be timely, the requisition requiring notice of a resolution must be deposited at our registered office at least six weeks before the next annual general meeting of shareholders. Shareholders satisfying the criteria of Section 79 may also require us to circulate a statement in respect of any matter to come before an annual general meeting of shareholders by requisition deposited at our registered office not less than one week prior to the annual general meeting of shareholders.

 

Corporate Governance Committee.  The primary purposes of the Corporate Governance Committee are to (1) develop, assess and recommend to the Board our corporate governance policies, and (2) evaluate, develop and recommend to the Board succession plans for all of the Company’s senior management. The Corporate Governance Committee works with the Compensation Committee to develop and recommend succession plans to the Board of Directors.

Meetings of Board of Directors and its Committees. The Board of Directors held four regularly scheduled meetings and sixthree other meetings (five(all of which were telephonic) during fiscal year 2014.  Each2016.  Except for Ms. Raff, who was unable to participate in three Compensation Committee meetings (each of which were telephonic), each Board member attended at least 75%75 percent of the meetings of our Board of Directors and the committee meetings for which they were members.  We encourage, but do not require, the members of the Board of Directors to attend annual general meetings and Director nominees.meetings. Last year, all of our Directors attended the annual general meeting of shareholders. We expect that all Board members and Director nominees will attend the Annual Meeting.

 

Committee RotationRotation.

The Board will consider the rotation of committee assignments and of committee chairs at such intervals as the Board determines on the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee. Consideration of rotation will seek to balance the benefits derived from continuity and experience, on the one hand, and the benefits derived from gaining fresh perspectives and enhancing Directors’ understanding of different aspects of the Company’s business and enabling functions. The Board did not rotate any committee chairs in fiscal year 2016.

 

SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

Any record or beneficial owner of our shares of Common Stock who has concerns about accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters relating to our Company may contact the Audit Committee directly. Any record or beneficial owner of our Common Stock who wishes to communicate with the Board of Directors on any other matter should also contact the Audit Committee.  The Audit Committee has undertaken on behalf of the Board of Directors to be the recipient of communications from shareholders relating to our Company. If particular communications are directed to the full Board, independent Directors as a group, or individual Directors, the Audit Committee will route these communications to the appropriate Directors or committees so long as the intended recipients are clearly stated.

 

Communications intended to be anonymous may be made by calling our national hotline service at 866-210-7649844-317-9054 or 866-210-7650.  Whenonline at WWW.HOTUS.ETHICSPOINT.COM. If calling, please identify yourself as a shareholder of our Company intending to communicate with the Audit Committee. This third party service undertakes to forward the communications to the Audit Committee if so requested and clearly stated. You may also send communications intended to be anonymous by mail, without indicating your name or address, to Helen of Troy, Limited, 1 Helen of Troy Plaza, El Paso, Texas, 79912, USA, Attention: Chairman of the Audit Committee.  Communications not intended to be made anonymously may be made by calling the hotline number or by mail to that address, including whatever identifying or other information you wish to communicate.

 

Communications from employees or agents of our Company will not be treated as communications from our shareholders unless the employee or agent clearly indicates that the communication is made solely in the person’s capacity as a shareholder.

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

 

During fiscal year 2014,2016, none of the members of the Compensation Committee was an officer (or former officer) or employee of the Company, and no executive officer of the Company served on the Compensation Committee (or equivalent), or the Board of Directors of another entity whose executive officer(s) served on the Company’s Compensation Committee or Board.

12



Table of Contents

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

The following table summarizes the total compensation earned by all non-employee Directors during fiscal year 2014:2016:

 

Director Compensation for Fiscal Year 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fees Earned

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

or Paid

 

 

Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

in Cash

 

 

Awards

 

 

Total

Name

 

 

($)

 

 

($)

 

 

($)

Gary B. Abromovitz

 

 

150,000

 

 

 

103,150

(1)

 

 

253,150

John B. Butterworth

 

 

84,000

 

 

 

103,150

(1)

 

 

187,150

Timothy F. Meeker

 

 

82,000

 

 

 

103,150

(1)

 

 

185,150

William F. Susetka

 

 

96,000

 

 

 

103,150

(1)

 

 

199,150

Adolpho R. Telles

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

103,150

(1)

 

 

203,150

Darren G. Woody

 

 

78,000

 

 

 

103,150

(1)

 

 

181,150

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Director Compensation for Fiscal Year 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fees Earned

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

or Paid

 

Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

in Cash

 

Awards

 

Total

 

Name

 

 

($)

 

($) (1)

 

($)

 

Gary B. Abromovitz

 

 

120,000

 

100,000

 

220,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John B. Butterworth

 

 

100,000

 

100,000

 

200,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alexander M. Davern

 

 

115,000

 

100,000

 

215,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Timothy F. Meeker

 

 

190,000

 

100,000

 

290,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beryl B. Raff

 

 

100,000

 

100,000

 

200,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

William F. Susetka

 

 

115,000

 

100,000

 

215,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Darren G. Woody

 

 

105,000

 

100,000

 

205,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)         The amounts abovein this column are based on the grant date fair valuevalues of $36.56, $40.09, $40.23$78.11, $88.45, $82.04 and $48.16$103.51 per share on March 1,3, June 3,2, September 3,1, and December 2, 2013,1, 2015, respectively, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Each of the restricted stock awards vested on the grant date. With respect to stock awards, approximately 30 percent of the value of the grant is settled with cash in order for the Directors to satisfy any tax liabilities associated with the grant.  Further information regarding the awards is included in “Grants to Directors of Plan Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2014” and “Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan.”

 

During the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014, Gerald J. Rubin,2015, Julien R. Mininberg, our former Chief Executive Officer, was our only Director thatwho was also an employee of the Company. He did not receive any remuneration for his service as a member of the Board of Directors.

In fiscal year Under compensation guidelines adopted in August 2014, the following cash compensation was paid to our non-employee Directors:

Directors Fees Earned or Paid in Cash for Fiscal Year 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual

 

 

Board

 

 

Executive

 

 

Deputy

 

 

Committee

 

 

Committee

 

 

 

 

 

 

Board

 

 

Meeting

 

 

Session

 

 

Chairman

 

 

Chair

 

 

Member

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retainers

 

 

Fees

 

 

Fees

 

 

Fees

 

 

Fees

 

 

Fees

 

 

Total

Name

 

 

($) (1)

 

 

($) (2)

 

 

($) (3)

 

 

($) (4)

 

 

($)

 

 

($) (5)

 

 

($)

Gary B. Abromovitz

 

 

24,000

 

 

12,000

 

 

24,000

 

 

40,000

 

 

20,000

(6)

 

30,000

 

 

150,000

John B. Butterworth

 

 

24,000

 

 

12,000

 

 

24,000

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

24,000

 

 

84,000

Timothy F. Meeker

 

 

24,000

 

 

12,000

 

 

24,000

 

 

-

 

 

10,000

(7)

 

12,000

 

 

82,000

William F. Susetka

 

 

24,000

 

 

12,000

 

 

24,000

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

36,000

 

 

96,000

Adolpho R. Telles

 

 

24,000

 

 

12,000

 

 

24,000

 

 

-

 

 

40,000

(8)

 

-

 

 

100,000

Darren G. Woody

 

 

24,000

 

 

12,000

 

 

24,000

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

18,000

 

 

78,000


(1)All non-employee Directors receive a quarterly cash retainer of $6,000.

(2)All non-employee Directors receive a quarterly cash fee of $3,000 for each regular meeting of the Board of Directors attended.

13



Table of Contents

(3)All independent Directors receive a quarterly cash fee of $6,000 for participation in executive sessions.

(4)The Deputy Chairman and lead Director receives a quarterly cash fee of $10,000.

(5)Each non-chair member of the Audit Committee receives a quarterly cash fee of $6,000, each non-chair member of the Compensation Committee receives a quarterly cash fee of $3,000 and each non-chair member of the Corporate Governance Committee receives a quarterly cash fee of $1,500.

(6)The Compensation Committee Chairman receives a quarterly cash fee of $5,000.

(7)The Corporate Governance Committee Chairman receives a quarterly cash fee of $2,500.

(8)The Audit Committee Chairman receives a quarterly cash fee of $10,000.

The members of the Nominating Committee did not receive compensation for their service on that committee in fiscal year 2014. The Nominating Committee consists of Messrs. Abromovitz (Chairman), Meeker and Woody.  In addition to the amounts shown above, non-employee Board members received reimbursement for travel and lodging expenses incurred while attending Board and committee meetings and Board-related activities, such as visits to Company locations.

After the Annual Meeting, the members of the Board of Directors will receive annual compensation for their services in the form of a cash retainer equal to $100,000 and Common Stock valued at $100,000. The grants of Common Stock are made in quarterly equal value installments on the first business day of each fiscal quarter based on fair market value of the Common Stock as of the close of business of the grant date. Under the compensation guidelines as previously adopted, the Chairman of the Board of Directors willwas to receive an additional $70,000 annually in cash compensation. Compensation was paid at this rate for the first quarter of fiscal year 2016. In August 2015, the Board of Directors voted to increase the annual cash compensation of the Chairman of the Board of Directors to $90,000. The Chairman of the Board of Directors also received an additional $5,000 annually as the Chairperson of the nominating committee, as further described below. The Deputy Chairman will receivereceived an additional $20,000 annually in cash compensation, and the Chairperson of each committee of the Board of Directors will receivereceived the following annual cash compensation:

 

Audit Committee

$15,000

Compensation Committee

$15,000

Nominating Committee

$5,000

Governance Committee

$5,000

 

AllNo other meeting attendance or committee fees are paid.

In fiscal year 2016, the following cash compensation was paid to our non-employee Directors.

Directors Fees Earned or Paid in Cash for Fiscal Year 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chairman

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And Deputy

Committee

 

 

Board

 

Chairman

 

Chair

 

 

Retainers

 

Fees

 

Fees

Total

Name

($) (1)

 

($)

 

($)

($)

Gary B. Abromovitz

100,000

 

20,000

(2)

          -

 

120,000

John B. Butterworth

100,000

 

-

 

          -

 

100,000

Alexander M. Davern

100,000

 

-

 

15,000

(4)

115,000

Timothy F. Meeker

100,000

 

85,000

(3)

5,000

(5)

190,000

Beryl B. Raff

100,000

 

-

 

          -

 

100,000

William F. Susetka

100,000

 

-

 

15,000

(6)

115,000

Darren G. Woody

100,000

 

-

 

5,000

(7)

105,000


(1)         All non-employee Directors received a quarterly cash retainer $25,000.

(2)         For his services as Deputy Chairman, Mr. Abromovitz received quarterly cash fees of $5,000.

(3)         For his services as Chairman of the Board, Mr. Meeker received a quarterly cash fee of $17,500 for the first quarter of fiscal year 2016 and committee servicequarterly cash fees will be eliminated.of $22,500 for all remaining fiscal quarters.

(4)         For his services as Chairman of the Audit Committee, Mr. Davern received quarterly cash fees of $3,750.

(5)         For his services as Chairman of the Nominating Committee, Mr. Meeker received quarterly cash fees of $1,250.

(6)         For his services as Chairman of the Compensation Committee, Mr. Susetka received quarterly cash fees of $3,750.

(7)         For his services as Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee, Mr. Woody received quarterly cash fees of $1,250.

 

Director Stock Ownership and Compensation Guidelines

 

The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors believe that Directors should own and hold Common Stock to further align their interests and actions with the interests of the Company’s shareholders. Accordingly, in June 2008, the Board of Directors adopted stock ownership and compensation guidelines for the Directors. Under these guidelines, the Directors should hold shares of the Company’s Common Stock equal in value to at least three times the annual cash retainer for the Directors. The guidelines provide that the stock ownership levels should be achieved by each Director within five years of his or her first appointment to the Board of Directors. Each current Director’s stock ownership in the Company exceeds these guidelines. To further encourage equity participation, the guidelines provide that equity awards to non-employee Directors either vest over a period of at least three years or are required to be held by the Director until his or her service with the Company ends.

In June 2014, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors adopted revised stock ownership and compensation guidelines for the Directors, which replaces the guidelines described above.replaced previous guidelines. These revised guidelines taketook effect after our Annual Meetingthe 2014 annual general meeting and will require that Directors hold shares of the Common Stock equal in value to at least twice the annual cash retainer for Directors. Because of the increase in the annual cash retainer received by the Directors beginning with the Annual Meeting, theseThese revised guidelines will require a higher ownership threshold than under the currentlypreviously effective guidelines. The revised guidelines provide that equity awards to non-employee Directors vest when granted. Because the effectiveness of the revised guidelines will taketook effect concurrentlyconcurrent with the increases in the Director annual cash retainers, the Directors will havewere given five years from the date of the increase to acquire any additional shares needed to comply with the revised guidelines. The Compensation Committee will review stock ownership levels on the first trading day of the calendar year based on the fair market value of the shares on such date.

 

14



Table of Contents

The Board of Directors also believes that compensation arrangements should be flexible enough to allow the Directors to receive a balanced mix of equity and cash keeping in mind the Board’s guidelines for achieving and maintaining stock ownership. In this respect, the Board of Directors will seek to target Director average compensation at a mix of approximately 50 percent cash and 50 percent equity, not including any annual cash chairpersonchair fees paid to the chairpersons of the Board committees. Each Director receives approximately 30 percent of the value of the stock grant award in cash in order to pay any tax liabilities associated with the grant.

Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan

 

At the 2008 annual general meeting of shareholders, the Company’s shareholders approved the Helen of Troy Limited 2008 Non-Employee Directors Stock Incentive Plan (the “2008 Director Plan”). The purpose of the 2008 Director Plan is to (1) aid the Company in attracting, securing, and retaining Directors of outstanding ability and (2) motivate such persons to exert their best efforts on behalf of the Company and its subsidiaries and its affiliates by providing incentives through the granting of awards under the plan. Only non-employee Directors of the Company are eligible to participate in the 2008 Director Plan.  Because Julien Mininberg is an employee of the Company, he is not eligible to participate in the 2008 Director Plan.

 

The 2008 Director Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The 2008 Director Plan permits grants of restricted stock, restricted stock units and other stock-based awards to the Company’s non-employee Directors. The vesting criteria and other terms and conditions of restricted stock, restricted stock units and other stock-based awards will be determined by the Compensation Committee. Shares which are subject to awards whichthat terminate, expire, are cancelled, exchanged, forfeited, lapse, or settled for cash may be utilized again with respect to awards granted under the 2008 Director Plan. As of June 2, 2014,  63,880May 10, 2016, 74,821 shares of restricted stock have been granted under the plan and 111,120100,179 shares of Common Stock remain available for future issue (subject to adjustment in certain circumstances). The plan will expire by its terms on August 19, 2018.

If a participant’s service is terminated for any reason, the participant will only be entitled to the restricted stock or restricted stock units vested at the time of such termination of service. The participant’s unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units will be forfeited. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Compensation Committee may accelerate the vesting of unvested restricted stock or restricted stock units held by a participant if the participant is terminated without “cause” (as determined by the Compensation Committee) by the Company.  In the event of a Change of Control (as defined in the 2008 Director Plan), (1) the participants will have the right to settle from and after the date of the Change of Control any restricted stock unit held by such participant in whole or in part, notwithstanding that such restricted stock unit may not be fully vested, and (2) any and all restrictions on any participant’s other stock-based award will lapse and such stock will immediately vest in the participant, notwithstanding that the other stock-based award was unvested.

15



Table of Contents

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

The following table sets forth, as of June 2, 2014,May 10, 2016, the beneficial ownership of the Common Stock of the Directors, nominees for Directors and the executive officers of the Company; the Directors, nominees for Director and executive officers of the Company as a group; and each person known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the Common Stock:

 

 

Number of

 

 

Number of

 

 

Common Shares

 

 

Common Shares

 

Name of Beneficial Owner

 

Beneficially Owned

Percent *

 

Beneficially Owned

 Percent *

Julien R. Mininberg

 

2,034

 

**

 

20,263

 

**

Thomas J. Benson

 

25,657

(1)

**

 

28,517

(1)

**

Vincent D. Carson

 

26,289

(1)

**

Brian L. Grass

 

5,734

(1)

**

 

17,245

(1)

**

Vincent D. Carson

 

19,968

(1)

**

Adolpho R. Telles

 

11,780

 

**

John B. Butterworth

 

6,693

 

**

Gary B. Abromovitz

 

10,693

 

**

Timothy F. Meeker

 

10,480

 

**

 

9,043

 

**

John B. Butterworth

 

10,130

 

**

William F. Susetka

 

6,043

 

**

Darren G. Woody

 

9,480

 

**

 

2,843

 

**

Gary B. Abromovitz

 

9,130

 

**

William F. Susetka

 

8,480

 

**

Alexander M. Davern

 

-    

(2)

**

 

1,563

 

**

Beryl B. Raff

 

-    

(2)

**

 

1,563

 

**

All Directors, Nominees for Directors and executive officers as a group (12 Persons)

 

112,873

(1)

0.40%

All Directors, nominees for Directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons)

 

130,755

(1)

0.47%

FMR LLC

 

4,806,823

(3)

16.95%

 

4,211,957

(2)

15.14%

245 Summer Street

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Boston, Massachusetts 02210

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Blackrock Inc.

 

2,618,683

(3)

9.42%

55 East 52nd Street

 

 

 

 

New York, NY 10022

 

 

 

 

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP

 

2,467,246

(4)

8.70%

 

2,295,966

(4)

8.26%

Palisades West, Building One

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6300 Bee Cave Road

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Austin, Texas 78746

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wellington Management Company, LLP

 

1,926,875

(5)

6.79%

280 Congress Street

 

 

 

 

Boston, Massachusetts 02210

 

 

 

 

Vanguard Group, Inc.

 

1,811,323

(6)

6.39%

 

2,202,641

(5)

7.92%

100 Vanguard Boulevard

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


*                 Percent ownership is calculated using a base denominator of 28,360,82627,812,344 shares of the Common Stock outstanding on June 2, 2014,May 10, 2016, adjusted in the case of Directors and executive officers, individually and as a group, for stock options exercisable within sixty days of June 2, 2014.May 10, 2016.

 

**          Ownership of less than one percent of the outstanding Common Stock.

16



Table of Contents

(1)         Includes shares subject to stock options that are exercisable within sixty days of June 2, 2014May 10, 2016 as follows:

 

 

Options
(#)

Thomas J. Benson

23,50024,125

Vincent D. Carson

18,50024,125

Brian L. Grass

5,40016,025

Total

47,40064,275

 

(2)         Ms. Raff and Mr. Davern have been nominated as Directors for election at the Annual Meeting.  Neither nominee has previously served on the Board.

(3)Based on the Schedule 13G/A filed on February 14, 2014.12, 2016. According to the filing, FMR LLC currently has sole dispositive power for 4,806,8234,211,957 shares, shared dispositive power for zero shares, sole voting power for 480,450715,277  shares, and shared voting power for zero shares.

(3)         Based on the Schedule 13G/A filed on January 26, 2016. According to the filing, Blackrock, Inc. has sole dispositive power for 2,618,683 shares, shared dispositive power for zero shares, sole voting power for 2,555,083 shares, and shared voting power for zero shares.

 

(4)         Based on the Schedule 13G/A filed on February 10, 2014.09, 2016. According to the filing, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP has sole dispositive power for 2,467,2462,295,966 shares, shared dispositive power for zero shares, sole voting power for 2,421,1662,269,262 shares, and shared voting power for zero shares.

 

(5)         Based on the Schedule 13G/A filed on February 14, 2014.  According to the filing, Wellington Management Company, LLP has sole dispositive power for zero shares, shared dispositive power for 1,926,875 shares, sole voting power for zero shares, and shared voting power for 1,377,329 shares.

(6)Based on the Schedule 13G/A filed on February 11, 2014.2016. According to the filing, Vanguard Group, Inc. currently has sole dispositive power for 1,764,2312,155,760 shares, shared dispositive power for 47,09246,881 shares, sole voting power for 48,99246,781 shares, and shared voting power for zero1,700 shares.

 

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

The executive officers of the Company are currently Julien R. Mininberg, Brian L. Grass, Thomas J. Benson Brian L. Grass and Vincent D. Carson. Mr. Mininberg is also an appointedserves as a Director of the Company and stands for nomination at the Annual Meeting. His biography is included above under “Proposal 1: Election of Directors.

BRIAN L. GRASS, age 46, joined the Company in 2006. In May 2014, Mr. Grass was appointed Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Prior to the appointment, he had served in the capacity of the Company’s Assistant Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Grass spent seven years in public accounting at KPMG LLP and six years in various financial leadership roles at Tenet Healthcare Corporation, a healthcare services company.

 

THOMAS J. BENSON, age 57,59, joined the Company in August 2003. EffectiveIn May 1, 2014, Mr. Benson was appointed Chief Operations Officer of the Company. From January 14, 2014 through February 28, 2014, Mr. Benson served as Interim Chief Executive Officer in addition to his duties as Chief Financial Officer. Prior to the new appointments, Mr. Benson served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Mr. Benson served as Chief Financial Officer of Elamex, S.A. de C.V., a provider of manufacturing and shelter services, from June 2002 to August 2003, and as Chief Financial Officer of Franklin Connections / Connections/Azar Nut Company, a manufacturer, packager and distributor of candy and nut products, from May 1994 to June 2002. He has served as an investments director in two private investment firms and spent seven years in public accounting. He received his B.S. from St. Mary’s College and his Masters Degree of Taxation from DePaul University.

BRIAN L. GRASS, age 44, joined the Company in 2006. Effective May 1, 2014, Mr. Grass  was appointed Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Prior to the new appointment, he had served in the capacity of the Company’s Assistant Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Grass spent seven years in public accounting at KPMG LLP and six years in various financial leadership roles at Tenet Healthcare Corporation, a healthcare services company.

 

VINCENT D. CARSON, age 54,56, joined the Company in November 2001. EffectiveIn May 1, 2014, Mr. Carson was appointed Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of the Company. Prior to the new appointment, he had served in the capacity of Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from November 2001 to September 2010. From September 2010 to April 30, 2014, he served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary of the Company. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Carson had a 16 year legal career in private practice in El Paso, Texas.

17



Table of Contents

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

 

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Compensation Committee”) has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for the fiscal year ended February 28, 201429, 2016 to be included in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting filed pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act.  Based on its review and discussion referred to above, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the proxy statement on Schedule 14A for the Company’s Annual Meeting and incorporated by reference in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014.29, 2016.

 

Members of the Compensation Committee:

 

William F. Susetka, Chairman

Gary B. Abromovitz Chairman

Timothy F. Meeker

William F. SusetkaBeryl B. Raff

Darren G. Woody

 

This Report of the Compensation Committee is not “soliciting material,” and is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this information by reference.

18



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

Julien R. Mininberg
Chief Executive Officer

Tom Benson*
Chief Operations Officer

 

Brian L. Grass
Chief Financial Officer

 

Vince Carson*Thomas J. Benson
Chief Operations Officer

Vincent D. Carson
Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

 

Gerald Rubin*
former President and
Chief Executive Officer

This section of the proxy statement explains how the Compensation Committee oversees our executive compensation programs reviews important changes the committee has made since our 2013 annual general meeting and discusses the compensation earned by our named executive officers below, including the compensation of our named executive officers, as presented in the tables under “Executive Compensation.”

Leadership Transition

On January 14, 2014, Mr. Rubin notified the Board of Directors that he was stepping down We sometimes refer to Messrs. Grass, Benson and Carson as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company. The Board of Directors then implemented its succession plan, appointing Mr. Mininberg as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, effective March 1, 2014. Between Mr. Rubin’s resignation and the effective date of Mr. Mininberg’s appointment, the Board appointed Mr. Benson, then serving as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, to serve as Interim Chief Executive Officer. Effective May 1, 2014, each of Messrs. Benson, Carson, and Grass was promoted to the positions of Chief Operations Officer, Chief Legal Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, respectively.

Under applicable SEC rules, because our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Mininberg, and our Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Grass, were not appointed to their positions until fiscal year 2015, they are not considered “named executive officers” for purposes of this proxy statement. Additionally, under applicable SEC rules, our“other named executive officers for fiscal year 2014 also include Mr. Rubin, our former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President.officers.”


 

*“Named executive officers” who are included in the Summary Compensation Table on page 42.

 

Executive Summary

 

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our executive compensation program and the important changes made since our 2013 annual general meeting to respond to shareholder feedback.  At the 2013 annual general meeting, the shareholders of the Company voting at the meeting voted against the compensation of our named executive officers described in our 2013 proxy statement (“say on pay”).  In connection with the 2013 say on pay vote,for fiscal year 2016. During fiscal year 2016, the Compensation Committee engaged in discussions with Company shareholders to gain input into the compensation elements that were among their top concerns and engaged an independent compensation consultant, Pearl Meyer & Partners (“Pearl Meyer”). The paramount concern expressed by our shareholders was the level ofresponsible for approving executive compensation and other pay practices relating to our former Chief Executive Officer.  Followingoverseeing the 2013 say on pay vote, we sought to negotiate changes to Mr. Rubin’s employment agreement to revise his compensation package. Mr. Rubin did not agree to any revisions to his agreement that the Compensation Committee believed would alleviate shareholder concerns.  The Compensation Committee  was therefore unable to make changes to Mr. Rubin’s compensation package in response to the say on pay vote.  In connection with the appointment of Mr. Mininberg as our Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee addressed the concernsadministration of our shareholders in Mr. Mininberg’s compensation package. These actions include the following:

19



Table of Contents

Topic

Action

Employment Agreement with New Chief Executive Officer

·Entered into an employment agreement with our new Chief Executive Officer designed to address shareholder concerns.

Benchmarking

·Established a benchmark peer group against which to compare and assess the Company’s compensation program and performance against similarly situated companies.

Market Compensation Levels

·Set the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer at what the Compensation Committee believes is a market level compared to peers.incentive plans and employee benefit plans.

 

·Substantially reduced the overall compensation of our Chief Executive Officer.

Rigorous Performance Metrics

·Established more rigorous performance goals based on multiple metrics that are not duplicative between short-term and long-term incentive awards.

Refocused Long-Term Incentives

·Established a three year performance period for long-term incentive awards of our Chief Executive Officer.

·Established minimum vesting periods for Company equity grants to our Chief Executive Officer.

Substantially Reduced Severance to Chief Executive Officer

·Substantially decreased any severance owed to our Chief Executive Officer upon a termination of employment when compared to that received by the former Chief Executive Officer.

Flexibility to Address Shareholder Feedback

·Maintained the flexibility to modify our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation package to reflect changes in market trends.

The Board also adopted stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers, with a five year period to reach the required ownership.  Overall, our executive compensation program as currently in effect emphasizes performance- and equity-based compensation to align it with shareholder interests and includes other practices that we believe serve shareholder interests such as paying for performance, not providing tax “gross-up” payments and maintaining policies relating to clawbacks of incentive awards and prohibitions on hedging or pledging Company stock.

Because the Company adopted the changes to its Important features of our fiscal year 2016 executive compensation program followinginclude the 2013 say on pay votefollowing:

Feature

Terms

Benchmarking; Market Compensation Levels

·                       Set the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer at what the Compensation Committee believes is a market level using a benchmark peer group of similarly situated companies against which to compare and assess the Company’s compensation program and performance.

Rigorous Performance Metrics

·                       Established rigorous performance goals based on multiple metrics that are not duplicative between short-term and long-term incentive awards.

Long-Term Incentives

·                       Established multi-year performance periods for long-term incentive awards, with minimum vesting periods for Company equity grants.

At the 2015 annual general meeting, approximately 98 percent of votes present (excluding abstentions and Mr. Mininberg did not assumebroker non-votes) voted for the responsibilities as Chief Executive Officer until after“Say-on-Pay” proposal related to our compensation policies. Following the end of each fiscal year, 2014,the Compensation Committee conducts a numberreview of all components of the significant changes toCompany’s compensation program. In consideration of the compensation program will not be reflected in named executive officer compensation tables until fiscal year 2015 executive compensation is reported inresults on the 2015 proxy statement.  The Board“Say-on-Pay” vote, the Compensation Committee acknowledged the support received from our shareholders and viewed the results as a confirmation of Directors believes that in order to evaluate the Company’s executive compensation polices, the shareholders should understand both the Company’s pastpolicies and current practices.decisions. Accordingly, this Compensation Discussionwe did not change our compensation principles and Analysis describes the fiscal year 2014 compensation decisions relating to theobjectives for our named executive officers as well as thein fiscal year 2015 changes relating2016 in response to the advisory vote of our newshareholders. However, on January 7, 2016, we entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with our Chief Executive Officer, that, among other matters, extended the term of his employment and other executive officers.  As a resultmodified certain of these revisedhis compensation policies andterms. This agreement became effective as of March 1, 2016, the significant progress that thefirst day of our fiscal year 2017. Pursuant to its terms, Mr. Mininberg’s original employment agreement was scheduled to expire on February 29, 2016. For further information, see “– Fiscal Year 2017 Compensation Committee has achieved following the 2013 annual general meeting, the Compensation Committee recommends a vote “For” the advisory say on pay proposal.Changes.”

20



Table of Contents

Fiscal Year 20142016 Performance Overview

 

Despite a retail environment and economy in our industry that remained challenging during fiscal year 2014, weGRAPHIC

We were able to meet a number of objectives aimed to further our core initiatives to grow our business and increase shareholder value, including:

 

·                  cumulative total shareholder returns of 134157 percent and 550241 percent over the past three and five fiscal years, respectively, that exceed bothour Compensation Peer Group (as described below), the NASDAQ Market Index, and the Dow Jones-U.S. Personal Products, Broad Market Cap, Yearly, and Total Return Index;Index (which we sometimes refer to as the “Industry Group”);

 

·                  a return on average equity fornet revenue compound annual growth rates of 6.3 percent and 14.8 percent over the past three and five fiscal year 2014 of 8.8 percent, which includes non-cash asset impairment charges of $12.03 millionyears, respectively; and succession costs of $16.34 million relating to our former Chief Executive Officer;

 

·                  Adjusted EBITDA (as defined incash flow from operations compound annual growth rates of 16.2 percent and 28.4 percent over the 2011 Bonus Plan) of $179.17 million forpast three and five fiscal year 2014;years, respectively.

·our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of $550 million of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock in keeping with its stated intention to return to shareholders capital not otherwise deployed for strategic acquisitions.  As part of that strategy, we completed a modified “Dutch auction” tender offer resulting in the repurchase of 3,693,816 shares for an aggregate purchase price of $245.64 million in March 2014;

·completion of the migration of our Healthcare / Home Environment segment onto our Global Enterprise Resource Planning (“ERP”) system, which we expect to eliminate costs associated with managing two ERP systems and improve uniformity of execution throughout our organization; and

·completion of the construction of a new $38.0 million, 1.3 million square foot distribution facility in Olive Branch, Mississippi built to consolidate the distribution operations of our U.S.-based Personal Care and Healthcare / Home Environment appliance businesses and allow for future growth.

21



Table of Contents

Elements of Executive Compensation

 

The Compensation Committee has structured the fiscal year 20152016 compensation of our named executive officers as follows:

 

Element

Type

Terms

Base Salary

Cash

·                         Fixed amount of compensation for performing day-to-day responsibilities.

 

·                         ExecutiveNamed executive officers other than our Chief Executive Officer are generally eligible for annual increases.

 

Annual Incentives and Bonuses

Cash

·                         Competitively-based annual incentive awards for achieving short-term financial goals (such as netannual adjusted income and net sales growth)targets) and other strategic objectives.objectives, as well as discretionary cash bonuses for exceptional performance and efforts relating to extraordinary Company events.

 

Performance Long-Term Incentives

Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)

·                         Performance RSUs vest overat the end of a three yearthree-year performance period.

 

·                         Number of Performance RSUs earned by executive officers is based upon adjusted earnings per share growth, adjusted cash flow productivity and relative total shareholder return performance metrics.

 

Time VestedTime-Vested Long-Term Incentives

RSUs; Stock Options RSU’s

·                         Stock options vest equally over a five year period.

·Time-Vested RSUs vest over a three yearthree-year period: 50 percent at the end of the 2nd year and 50 percent at the end of the 3rd year.

 

·                         NotFor fiscal year 2016, these were not available to our Chief Executive Officer.

 

Other

Perquisites

·                         Very limited perquisites.

 

 

Overview of Compensation Practices

 

Oversight of Our Executive Compensation Program

 

The Compensation Committee oversees the compensation of our named executive officers and is composed entirely of independent Directors as defined under the listing standards of NASDAQ. The Compensation Committee is responsible for evaluating the Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of the goals and objectives of the Company. It also makes compensation recommendations with respect to our other executive officers, including approval of awards for incentive compensation and equity-based plans. The Compensation Committee and the Corporate Governance Committee also assist the Board of Directors in developing succession planning for our named executive officers.

The Role of Chief Executive Officer in Determining Executive Compensation

 

The Compensation Committee, working with the Chief Executive Officer, evaluates and approves all compensation regarding our other named executive officers. Our other named executive officers report directly to our Chief Executive Officer who supervises the day to day performance of those officers. Accordingly, the Chief Executive Officer establishes the criteria and any targets used to determine bonuses, including each other named executive officer’s individual performance and Company-based performance factors, and makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding salaries, bonuses and equity awards for the other named executive officers. The Compensation Committee strongly considers the compensation recommendations and the performance evaluations of the Chief Executive Officer in making its decisions and any recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to other named executive officers’ compensation, incentive

22



Table of Contents

compensation plans and equity-based plans that are required to be submitted to the Board.  In deliberations or approvals regarding the compensation of the other named executive officers, the Compensation Committee may elect to invite the Chief Executive Officer to be present but not vote.  In any deliberations or approvals of the Compensation Committee regarding the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, the Chief Executive Officer is not invited to be present.

 

Objectives of Our Compensation Program

 

Our compensation program is designed to attract, motivate and retain key employees and to align the long-term interests of the named executive officers with those of our shareholders. The philosophy that the Compensation Committee uses to set executive compensation levels and structures is based on the following principles:

 

·                  compensation for our named executive officers should be linked to performance;

 

·                  a higher percentage of compensation should be performance-based as an executive officer’s range of responsibility and ability to influence the Company’s results increase;

 

·                  compensation should be competitive in relation to the marketplace; and

 

·                  outstanding achievement should be recognized.

 

In addition, we believe that our compensation programs for executive officers should be appropriately tailored to encourage employees to grow our business, but not encourage them to do so in a way that poses unnecessary or excessive material risk to the Company.

 

Compensation Consultant and Other Advisers

 

The Compensation Committee has the independent authority to hire compensation, accounting, legal, or other advisors. In connection with any such hiring, the Compensation Committee can determine the scope of the consultant’s assignments and their fees. The scope of a consultant’s services may include providing the Compensation Committee with data regarding compensation trends, assisting the Compensation Committee in the preparation of market surveys or tally sheets or otherwise helping it evaluate compensation decisions.  Since fiscal year 2011, the

The Compensation Committee has retained Pearl Meyer & Partners (“Pearl Meyer”) as its independent compensation consultant.consultant to assist in the evaluation of the compensation packages of our Chief Executive Officer and the other named executive officers for fiscal year 2015. Pearl Meyer worksworked directly with the Compensation Committee (and not on behalf of management) to assist the Compensation Committee in meeting its responsibilities. During fiscal year 2014, Pearl Meyer assisted the Compensation Committee in connection with an analysis ofanalyze the compensation received by our named executive officers, includingand assisted in establishing a peer group on which a benchmarking study could be conducted and assisting in evaluating shareholder feedback in connectionwas conducted. In April 2015, the Compensation Committee engaged Frederic W. Cook & Company (“FW Cook”) as its independent compensation consultant to assist the Compensation Committee with the 2013 say on pay vote.  Pearl Meyer also helped evaluate the newits compensation decisions for our named executive officers for fiscal year 2015 compensation packages of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers. Pearl Meyer performs no other services for the Company and, to date, has not undertaken any projects on behalf of management.  2017. The Compensation Committee has determined that neither Pearl Meyer has nonor FW Cook had any conflicts of interest relating to its engagement by the Compensation Committee.

23



Table of Contents

Benchmarking

 

In response to shareholder input concerning the level of compensation paid to the former Chief Executive Officer, theThe Compensation Committee decided to benchmarkbenchmarked the compensation of our new Chief Executive Officer beginning infor fiscal year 2016, which was not changed from fiscal year 2015.  The Compensation Committee believes that targeting executive compensation within the peer group permits the Compensation Committee to assess an appropriate total value and mix of pay for our executives and to set the compensation of our named executive officers in a manner that is competitive in relation to the marketplace. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee engaged Pearl Meyer to establishprepare a peer group list for the Compensation Committee to serveconsider as a benchmark in determining the fiscal year 2015 total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer (the “Compensation Peer Group”).  The Compensation Committee also used the Compensation Peer Group, as well as survey data, to assist the committee in setting the fiscal year 20152016 total compensation of our other executive officers. ThisThe fiscal year 2016 Compensation Peer Group consists of the following 1514 companies:

 

Jarden Corp.

American Greetings Corp.Lifetime Brands Inc.

Newell Rubbermaid Inc.

Tempur Sealy International Inc.

Clorox Co. (The)

Revlon Inc.

Coty Inc.

Elizabeth Arden Inc.

Spectrum Brands Holdings Inc.

NACCO Industries Inc.

Church & Dwight Co. Inc.

Libbey Inc.

Tupperware Brands Corp.

Lifetime Brands Inc.

Nu Skin Enterprises Inc.

 

In compiling the Compensation Peer Group, the Compensation Committee considered management input, peer groups lists prepared by proxy advisers and the input of its independent compensation consultant. The Compensation Peer Group includes a mix of companies identified as being within our peer group by proxy advisors or recommended by our compensation consultant or management. The organizations ultimately included in the Compensation Peer Group were chosen because they are a source of talent, are within the general industry of the Company and have comparable revenues, are competitors of the Company or have similar distribution channels as the Company. The Compensation Committee also screened companies included in the Compensation Peer Group with a focus on including those with revenues of one-third to three times the revenue of the Company. Although their revenues are more than three times larger than those of the Company, the Compensation Committee decided to include The Clorox Co., Jarden Corp., Newell Rubbermaid Inc. and Coty Inc. in the Compensation Peer Group because they are direct competitors of the Company and are a source of talent. The Compensation Committee willplans to review the Compensation Peer Group on an annual basis.  Other than the removal of one company from the peer group on an annual basis.due to corporate transactions, the Compensation Committee determined not to change the peer group for fiscal year 2016.

 

The Compensation Committee used median compensation data for similar positions in the Compensation Peer Group as a guide to setting fiscal year 2015 compensation targets for our named executive officers. For our named executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee also considered survey data. The actual total compensation and/or amount of each compensation element for an individual may be more or less than this median. For fiscal year 2015 compensation, the Compensation Committee has benchmarked the total target compensation received byof Mr. Mininberg at approximately the 50th50th percentile level. Because of the overwhelming approval by our shareholders of our compensation policies in fiscal year 2015, the Compensation Committee determined not to make significant changes to Mr. Mininberg’s elements of compensation for fiscal year 2016 and elected to maintain the same level of total target compensation for Mr. Mininberg in fiscal year 2016.

 

24



Table of Contents

Our Pay Practices and Corporate Governance

 

A summary of our current pay practices includes the following:

WHAT WE DO

WHAT WE DO NOT DO

Pay for Performance – We heavily link our executive compensation program to the Company’s operating performance. We ensure that a significant portion of our named executive officer’sofficers’ compensation opportunities are performance-based. The amount of the payout to our Chief Executive Officer is contingent on the degree to which the Company achieves pre-established performance goals that the Compensation Committee has determined are aligned with the Company’s short- and long-term operating and financial objectives.

No Tax Gross UpsPledging of Common Stock – Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits Board members and Eliminationour named executive officers from pledging Common Stock.  None of Other Problematic Governance and Pay Practicesour Directors or executive officers has any existing pledging arrangements.

WHAT WE DO

– Over the last several years, we have eliminated problematic practices, such as tax gross-ups and the right to “guaranteed” grants of equity awards.WHAT WE DO NOT DO

 

Refocused Incentive Goals – Our annual and long termlong-term incentive program has been redesigned, with an emphasis on establishingincludes multiple and more rigorous performance goals that are not duplicative between shortshort- term and long termlong-term incentive awards. Long termLong-term awards are measured over a three yearthree-year period. By using different performance measures in our annual cash incentive program and our long-term stock incentive program, we mitigate the risk that our Chief Executive Officer would be motivated to pursue results with respect to one performance measure to the detriment of the Company as a whole.

No Pledging of Common Stock – Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits Board members and our named executive officers from pledging Common Stock. None of our Directors or executive officers has any existing pledging arrangements.

 

Limitation of Employment Term for our Chief Executive Officer –The Employment Agreement has a termination date of February 28, 2016.

No Use of Common Stock as Collateral for Margin Loans Board members and our named executive officers are prohibited from using Common Stock as collateral for any margin loan.

Limitation of Employment Term for our Chief Executive Officer – Mr. Mininberg’s employment agreement has a termination date of February 28, 2019.

 

No Pension Plans or Special Retirement Programs for Executive Officers – We do not have a pension plan, and our named executive officers do not participate in any retirement programs not generally available to our employees.

 

Compensation Recoupment Policies – In order to discourage excessive risk-taking and misconduct on the part of the executive officers, each of our annual cash incentive plan and our principal equity compensation plan includes a clawback provision.

No Pension Plans or Special Retirement Programs for Executive OfficersExcessive Perquisites – We do not haveprovide only a pension plan,limited number of perquisites and supplemental benefits to attract talented executives to the Company and to retain our executive officers do not participate in any retirement programs not generally available to our employees.

current executives.

Annual Shareholder “Say on Pay” – Because we value our shareholders’ input on our executive compensation programs, our Board has chosen to provide shareholders with the opportunity each year to vote to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers in our proxy statement.

No Excessive Perquisites – We provide only a limited number of perquisites and supplemental benefits to attract talented executives to the Company and to retain our current executives.

 

25



Table of Contents

WHAT WE DO

WHAT WE DO NOT DO

Limitations on Severance – The Compensation Committee has significantly reduced the potential payment of severance to our Chief Executive Officer compared to the severance available to our former Chief Executive Officer.  We have no severance plans or arrangements in place for our other executive officers.

No Hedging – Board members and our named executive officers are prohibited from engaging in transactions (such as trading in options) designed to hedge against the value of the Company’s Common Stock, which would eliminate or limit the risks and rewards of the Common Stock ownership.

 

Limitation on Employment Contracts – All of our named executive officers, other than our Chief Executive Officer, are employed on an at-will basis.  Each executive officer has post-termination and non-competition obligations with the Company pursuant to which the executive officer has agreed that he will not participate in a business that competes with us.

No Speculative Trading – Board members and our named executive officers are prohibited from short-selling the Common Stock, buying or selling puts and calls of the Common Stock, or engaging in any other transaction that reflects speculation about the Common Stock price or that might place their financial interests against the financial interests of the Company.

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines – Our named executive officers are subject to certain stock ownership and holding requirements. The Chief Executive Officer is required to own Common Stock equal in value to at least three times annual salary, and each other executive officer is required to own Common Stock equal in value to at least one timetimes annual salary.

No Unapproved Trading Plans – Board members and our named executive officers are prohibited from entering into securities trading plans pursuant to SEC Rule 10b5-1 without pre-approval; further, no Board member or any executive officer may trade in our Common Stock without pre-approval.

 

Our Compensation Program for Our Chief Executive Officer

 

Mr. Mininberg has served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company since March 1, 2014 and iswas party to an employment agreement that became effective on that date (the “Employment Agreement”). On January 7, 2016, we entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Mr. Mininberg, effective March 1, 2016 (the “New Employment Agreement”). For further information regarding the compensatory terms of the New Employment Agreement, see “– Fiscal Year 2017 Compensation Changes.” Mr. Mininberg sets the overall strategic vision for our Company, and oversees the senior management team and the Company’s growth and acquisition strategy.  Over the course of the last year, theThe Compensation Committee engaged in an extensive re-examination of our executive compensation program following the shareholder vote against our say on pay proposal at our 2013 annual general meeting.  Because of the shareholder concerns, the Compensation Committee sought direct feedback from shareholders in connection with the say on pay vote.

A paramount concern that our shareholders expressed to the Compensation Committee was the level of overall compensation recognized by our former Chief Executive Officer. Accordingly, in evaluating the compensation of Mr. Mininberg, the Compensation Committeehas structured thehis compensation so that it fellfalls within a range paid to chief executives of peer companies that followed the compensation guidelines of proxy advisory firms. To assist the Compensation Committee in these efforts, it evaluated the compensation relative to organizations in the Compensation Peer Group. The Compensation Peer Group hasCommittee targeted Mr. Mininberg’s total compensation in fiscal year 2015 at approximately the 50th50th percentile level of the Compensation Peer Group.

Additionally, based on the input from our shareholders and Pearl Meyer, the The Compensation Committee has made a numberelected to maintain the same level of total target compensation for Mr. Mininberg and determined not to make significant changes to Mr. Mininberg’s elements of compensation for fiscal year 2016. The Compensation Committee believes the compensation program of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer that it believes is closely aligned with the interests of the shareholders. The following chart provides a summary of important actions taken by the Compensation Committee in connection with Mr. Mininberg’s Employment Agreement and compensation package.

26



Table of Contents

Shareholder Feedback

Features Prior To Say On Pay Vote

New Features and Changes After Say On
Pay Vote

Level of overall compensation package.

No benchmarked compensation.

Benchmarked the compensation so that it fell within a range paid to chief executives of peer companies.

Duplicative metrics with respect to the annual and long-term incentive objectives

For fiscal year 2014, both the annual and long-term incentive objectives included an EBITDA metric as component of the financial objectives.

Eliminated duplicative metrics.

Rigor of performance measures

Low minimums relating to achievement of performance awards.

Established higher thresholds and more rigorous performance goals.

High maximum payout for the annual bonus.

The maximum annual bonus was $25 million.

The maximum annual bonus is $2.97 million, or 3.3 times base salary.

Insufficient longevity of long term performance measures.

Performance restricted stock units earned on an annual basis based on annual performance or, if annual performance is not met,  average performance over a three year period.

Performance restricted stock units earned at the end of a three year performance period.

Greater number of performance criteria with respect to the annual and long-term incentive objectives.

Annual bonus opportunity was based on Adjusted EBITDA and long term performance award based solely on EBITDA return on invested capital.

Multiple performance criteria establish for both annual performance awards (based on adjusted net income growth and net sales growth) and long term performance awards (based on adjusted earnings per share growth, adjusted cash flow productivity and relative total shareholder return).

Level of severance payments

Potential cash severance payment of up to $15 million as of fiscal year end 2014, as well as the accelerated vesting of equity awards under specified circumstances.

Potential cash severance payment will not exceed $4 million, with no accelerated vesting of awards, due to termination of employment.

The Compensation Committee believes that Mr. Mininberg’s compensation package is responsive to shareholder inputshareholders and reflective of the marketplace. Because the Company adopted the changes to its executive compensation program following the 2013 say on pay vote, a number of these changes will not be reflected in named executive officer compensation tables until fiscal year 2015 executive compensation is reported in the 2015 proxy statement.

 

Pay for Performance

 

The Compensation Committee believes that performance basedperformance-based compensation aligns our Chief Executive Officer’s interests with our annual corporate goals and that a substantial majority of his compensation should be performance-based considering the scope and level of his business responsibilities. For fiscal year 20152016 and the remaining term of the New Employment Agreement, Mr. Mininberg’s performance compensation was and will be based on a balanced mix of equity and cash awards. Under the Employment Agreement and related compensation programs, the Compensation Committee uses

27



Table of Contents

targeted, performance-based compensation goals for our Chief Executive Officer.  These targets are designed to incorporate performance criteria that promote our short-term and long-term business strategies, build long-term shareholder value and avoid encouraging excessive risk-taking.

For fiscal year 2015,2016, approximately 79 percent of Mr. Mininberg’s target total compensation will bewas tied to Company performance.

 

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

 

Elements of the Compensation Program for Our Chief Executive Officer

 

TheFor fiscal year 2016, the principal components of compensation for our Chief Executive Officer are:were:

 

·                  base salary;

 

·                  performance-based incentive awards (annual and long-term);

 

·                  limited perquisites; and

 

·                  reducedlimited post-termination benefits.

Additionally, the Compensation Committee approved the payment of a discretionary bonus to our Chief Executive Officer in fiscal year 2016.  The Compensation Committee reviews total compensation for the Chief Executive Officer annually and evaluates his performance. Each year, the Compensation Committee also certifies that the amounts of any bonus payments under the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan (“2011 Bonus Plan”) have been accurately determined and that the performance targets approved by the shareholders, and any other material terms previously established by the Compensation Committee, were in fact satisfied.  The Compensation Committee believes that performance-based compensation should constitute a substantial portion of our Chief Executive Officer’s total compensation. As a result, the Compensation Committee anticipates that the Chief Executive Officer’s base salary will represent a small percentage of the Chief Executive Officer’s total compensation.compensation in any given fiscal year. Mr. Mininberg’s total compensation is primarily performance-based and tied directly to the success of the Company.  In addition, Mr. Mininberg’s performance-based compensation consists of a mix of cash and equity to provide an appropriate balance of incentives to achieve both the short-term and long-term goals of the Company.

 

Base Salary of Our Chief Executive Officer

 

We provide our named executive officers and other employees with a base salary to provide a fixed amount of compensation for regular services rendered during the fiscal year.  The Employment Agreement sets Mr. Mininberg’s salary at $900,000 per year.

 

28



Table of Contents

Performance-Based Incentive Awards for Our Chief Executive Officer

 

The Compensation Committee also designed Mr. Mininberg’s compensation package to include a balance of short-term incentive compensation awarded on an annual basis and long-term incentive awardcompensation measured over a three-year performance period. Both short-term and long-term incentive compensation for Mr. Mininberg is based on multiple performance measures.

 

Annual Incentive Awards

 

The Compensation Committee believes that performance-based awards align our executives’ interests with our annual corporate goals and are important to the success of the Company.  Accordingly, Mr. Mininberg is entitled to receive an annual incentive bonus, subject to the achievement of specific performance conditions an annual incentive bonus.  In response to shareholder input concerning the performance goals associated with the bonus of our former Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee established what it believes are more rigorous performance goals that are not duplicative between short term and long termof the performance conditions of his long-term incentive awards.   The Compensation Committee also based the annual incentive award on two performance measures, which are intended to measure identified short term goals of the Company.  Unlike the employment agreement with our former Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Mininberg’s annual incentive compensation iswas not based on a set performance measure over the term of the Employment Agreement.  Accordingly, the Compensation Committee iswas able to reevaluate and establish the performance measures on an annual basis to reflect shareholder input and changes in market trends.

 

With respect to fiscal year 2015, Mr. Mininberg will be eligible for an annual performance bonus payable in cash under the 2011 Bonus Plan targeted at $1,800,000, with the opportunity to earn up to $2,970,000 and a threshold achievement payout of $900,000.  In response to shareholder concerns, the Compensation Committee elected to base Mr. Mininberg’s annual incentive award on multiple targets. The fiscal year 20152016 bonus opportunity iswas based on the achievement of adjusted income and net sales targets, with no annual incentive award to be paid if the threshold adjusted income growth (basedtarget was not met. Adjusted income is calculated based on net income, without asset impairment charges)charges, gains and net sales growth.losses from dispositions, acquisition related expenses, restructuring charges, litigation charges, non-market based currency revaluations, and chief executive officer succession costs (collectively, the “Signinficant Items”). The Compensation Committee values both goals as important to the Company’s success. For fiscal year 2016, the Compensation Committee set the threshold, target and maximum adjusted income and net sales values at the following levels:

Performance Metric

Threshold

Target

Maximum

Adjusted Income

$124.0 million

$138.0 million

$148.0 million

Net Sales

$1,350.0 million

$1,510.0 million

$1,570.0 million

Depending upon the achievement of the above performance goals, for fiscal 2016, Mr. Mininberg was eligible for cash payout under the 2011 Bonus Plan targeted at $1,800,000, with a maximum payout of 165 percent of the target amount and a threshold payout of 50 percent of the target amount. For adjusted income and net sales results that fall in between the threshold and the target and the target and maximum values, the payout percentage of the award is calculated as a percent of the target amount using a non-linear curve.

 

Eighty percent (80%) of the bonus opportunity iswas based on the achievement of the netadjusted income growth performance measure and twenty percent (20%) of the bonus opportunity will bewas based on the achievement of the net sales growth performance measure. The committee placed a higher weight on the netadjusted income growth goal over the net sales growth goal because it believes that netadjusted income is the most accurate and significant factor in measuring our performance.  Additionally, the emphasis on the netadjusted income growth metric reflects the importance the Board places on achieving profitability through disciplined business expansion and expense management.  BecauseIf the adjusted income threshold had not been achieved, because of the importance the Compensation Committee places on netadjusted income, growth, if the adjusted net income growth threshold is not achieved, no bonus will bewould have been earned or payable with respect to fiscal year 2015.2016.  Additionally, Mr. Mininberg willis not be entitled to athat

portion of the bonus with respectattributed to any performance measure if the threshold amount associated with such performance measure is not achieved.

 

The adjusted net income growth and adjusted net sales growth formulastargets are subject to adjustment in the event that the Company or any of its subsidiaries consummates an acquisition of the stock or assets of another entity or business or divests any stock or assets of the Company or its subsidiaries. The Compensation Committee believes these adjustments properly modify performance targetsresults under the Amended 2011 Bonus Plan to account for the impact of acquisitions and divestituresdivestitures.

For fiscal year 2016, the Compensation Committee’s exercised its discretion to negatively adjust the adjusted income and encourage transactions that are accretivenet sales amounts for fiscal year 2016 used in the determination of the bonus payout percentage, decreasing the amounts by approximately $2,680,000 and $4,057,000, respectively, due to the Company, consistent withbeneficial impact that hyperinflation had on the Company’s long-term goals.Venezuelan operating results. Following these adjustments, for purposes of determining the bonus payout percentage, the Company’s adjusted income was  $145,719,000, representing 105.6 percent of the target measure and resulting in a payout percentage relating to that target of 149.8 percent, and the Company’s net sales were $1,541,644,000, representing 102.1 percent of the target measure and resulting in a payout percentage relating to that target of 111.6 percent. As a result, the Compensation Committee determined Mr. Mininberg had earned a cash bonus of $2,558,942 under the 2011 Bonus Plan (a blended percentage of 142.2 percent of the target award).

 

Long-Term Incentive Awards

 

The Compensation Committee believes that executive compensation should be linked, in part, to building long-term shareholder value. This objective is met by providing long-term incentives in the form of equity-based awards, such as performance-based restricted stock units.units (“Performance RSUs”). These grants make the performance of the Company’s Common Stock a targeted incentive.  In response to shareholder feedback, theThe Compensation Committee established what it believes are more rigorous performance goals that are not duplicative between short term and long termlong-term incentive awards.  Additionally, the Compensation Committee established a three yearthree-year performance period for long termlong-term incentive awards of our Chief Executive Officer.

 

29



Table of Contents

As part of this objective, with respect to fiscal year 2015,2016, Mr. Mininberg will beis eligible to receive a long-term incentive award for a three year performance period ending February 28, 2017,2018, pursuant to the Helen of Troy Amended and Restated 2008 Stock Plan.Plan (the “2008 Stock Plan”). Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, this award is in the form of a grant of restricted stock units (“RSUs”).Performance RSUs. The fiscal year 20152016 Performance RSU grant is targeted at $1,500,000,19,577 Performance RSUs (with a grant date fair value of $1,500,000), with the opportunity to earn up to $3,000,00039,154 Performance RSUs (with a grant date fair value of $3,000,000) and a threshold achievement payout of $750,000.9,789 Performance RSUs (with a grant date fair value of $750,000). The fiscal year 20152016 Performance RSU grant will beis based on the achievement of adjusted earnings per share growth (based on earnings per share, without asset impairment charges),Significant Items, adjusted cash flow productivity (as described below) and relative total shareholder return. Fifty percent (50%) of the fiscal year 20152016 Performance RSU grant will beis based on the achievement of the adjusted earnings per share growth performance measure, twenty-five percent (25%) of the fiscal year 20152016 Performance RSU grant will beis based on the achievement of the adjusted cash flow productivity performance measure and twenty-five percent (25%) of the fiscal year 20152016 Performance RSU grant will beis based on the achievement of the relative total shareholder return performance measure.  The comparison group for purposes of the relative total shareholder return measure is the benchmarked Compensation Peer Group.  However, for purposes of this calculation, the Compensation Committee excluded American Greetings Corp. due to it becoming a privately-held corporation.

 

The Compensation Committee used adjusted earnings per share growth because it believes it is viewed by our shareholders as an important reflection of the Company’s financial health and it measures how the Company is performing with respect to profitability and value creation.  Due to the importance of adjusted earnings per share growth to the Company’s shareholders over the long-term, the Compensation Committee elected to use the measure as the highest weighted metric in the determination of Mr. Mininberg’s long-term incentive award. The adjusted cash flow productivity metric is calculated by dividing (1) thenet cash provided by operating cash flowactivities of the Company, less capital spending,and intangible asset expenditures, by (2) adjusted income (calculated based on net income.income, without Significant Items). The Compensation Committee chose this metric because it calculates how the Company’s operations are effectively using its investments to generate cash flow.  The measure also reflects the importance of cash flow as a means of assessing the fiscal soundness of the Company.  The Compensation Committee chose the relative total shareholder return metric because it provides a direct link between Mr. Mininberg’s compensation and shareholder results allowing his performance to be judged in comparison to peer group performance, while also allowing positive and negative adjustments for unexpected market conditions. Mr. Mininberg willis not be entitled to a bonus with respectthat portion of the award attributed to any performance measure if the threshold amount associated with such performance measure is not achieved.

Discretionary Bonuses

 

The adjusted earnings per share growth and cash flow productivity growth formulas are subject to adjustment in the event that the Company or any of its subsidiaries consummates an acquisition of the stock or assets of another entity or business or divests any stock or assets of the Company or its subsidiaries. The Compensation Committee believes these adjustments properly modify these performance targets to accountmade a discretionary grant of 2,000 restricted shares in March 2015, with a grant date fair value of $178,240.  The grant rewarded Mr. Mininberg for the impact of acquisitions and divestitures and encourage transactions that are accretivehis contributions to the Company, consistent with the Company’s long-term goals.

Aftersuccess and his extensive efforts toward those ends and in lieu of increasing Mr. Mininberg’s base salary for fiscal year 2015,2016.  Additionally, Mr. Mininberg will be eligible for long-term incentive compensation awards under the 2008 Stock Plan or any successor plan as determined by the Compensation Committee. Mr. Mininberg will also continue to be entitled to receive any award granted pursuant to the terms and conditionsreceived a holiday bonus of the Kaz, Inc. 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan and earned prior to the date of the Employment Agreement.$2,500 in fiscal year 2016.

 

Limited Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits Provided to Our Chief Executive Officer

 

Under the Employment Agreement, Mr. Mininberg is entitled to participate in various benefit plans available to all employees of the Company, such as a 401(k) plan (including matching contributions), group medical, group life and group dental insurance, as well as vacation and paid holidays. In addition, the Employment Agreement provides that the Company must paypays or reimbursereimburses Mr. Mininberg for reasonable travel and other expenses incurred by him in performing his obligations underobligations. Additionally, in fiscal year 2016, the Employment Agreement.

Company paid $25,000 in legal fees on Mr. Mininberg and a subsidiaryMininberg’s behalf in connection with the negotiation of the Company have previously entered into an Endorsement Split Dollar Agreement (the “Insurance Agreement”), which provides for a life insurance policy issued by the Lincoln National Life Insurance Company in the amount of $5,000,000 on the life of Mr. Mininberg (the “Policy”). The Company owned and was obligated to pay

30



Table of Contents

premiums on the Policy until May 11, 2018. Pursuant to theNew Employment Agreement, the Company transferred ownership of and assigned all rights under the Policy to Mr. Mininberg on May 18, 2014.  The Policy had a cash surrender value of

approximately $356,000 as of the date of the transfer.  The Compensation Committee determined to transfer the Policy to Mr. Mininberg in order to eliminate a $125,000 annual premium that would have otherwise been required to be paid by the Company.  As a result of the transfer, the Company will no longer have any obligations (including the payment of premiums) with respect to the Policy or under the Insurance Agreement.

 

Potential Post-Termination Benefits for our Chief Executive Officer

 

Severance. The Employment Agreement providesprovided for certain payments and benefits upon Mr. Mininberg’s termination of employment, as described below:

 

·Death or Disability. If Mr. Mininberg’s employment is terminated by reason of death or disability, then he (or his estate) will be entitled receive (1) any portion of unpaid base salary earned but not yet paid to him as of the date of termination, (2)  any unpaid incentive payment earned by Mr. Mininberg with respect to any award under the 2011 Bonus Plan or the 2008 Stock Plan and vested prior to the effective date of termination, (3) a pro rata bonus for the year in which his death or disability occurred, as the Compensation Committee, in its reasonable discretion, determines he likely would have received for the performance period during which his employment was terminated, and (4) any death or disability benefits under the life insurance and disability programs of the Company and its subsidiaries to which he is entitled.

·Termination by Company For Cause or by Mr. Mininberg Other Than For Good Reason. If Mr. Mininberg’s employment is terminated for cause by the Company or other than for good reason by Mr. Mininberg, then he will be entitled to receive (1) any portion of unpaid base salary earned but not yet paid to him as of the date of termination and (2) any unpaid incentive payment earned by Mr. Mininberg with respect to any award under the 2011 Bonus Plan or the 2008 Stock Plan and vested prior to the effective date of termination.

·Termination by Mr. Mininberg For Good Reason or by Company Other Than For Cause. If Mr. Mininberg’s employment is terminated by Mr. Mininberg for good reason or by the Company other than for cause, then he will be entitled to receive: (1) any portion of unpaid base salary or other benefit earned but not yet paid to him as of the date of termination (except that no benefit or other compensation with respect to any awards under 2011 Bonus Plan or the 2008 Stock Plan shall be payable), (2) a single payment in the amount of $4,000,000 payable in 18 equal installments commencing on the first payroll date that is at least 60 but not more than 75 days after the date of termination and on a monthly basis thereafter, and (3) to the extent permitted by benefit plans of the Company and its subsidiaries, and applicable law, the continuation of health insurance benefits under COBRA for Mr. Mininberg and his family for a maximum of 18 months after the date of termination or until Mr. Mininberg is covered by or eligible for coverage under another health insurance policy, if that occurs earlier than 18 months. All payments and benefits due to Mr. Mininberg, other than any portion of unpaid base salary and any payment or benefit otherwise required by any rule or regulation issued by any state or federal governmental agency, will be contingent upon Mr. Mininberg’s execution of a general release of all claims to the maximum extent permitted by law against the Company, its affiliates and their respective and former directors, employees and agents pursuant to the Employment Agreement.

Change in Control.  The Employment Agreement does not contain the provision of any payment that is linked to a change of control of the Company.

Death or Disability.  If Mr. Mininberg’s employment was terminated by reason of death or disability, then he (or his estate) would have been entitled receive (1) any portion of unpaid base salary earned but not yet paid to him as of the date of termination, (2)  any unpaid incentive payment earned by Mr. Mininberg with respect to any award under the 2011 Bonus Plan or the 2008 Stock Plan prior to the effective date of termination, (3) pro rata incentive compensation for the year in which his death or disability occurred, as the Compensation Committee, in its reasonable discretion, determines he likely would have received for the performance period during which his employment was terminated, and (4) any death or disability benefits under the life insurance and disability programs of the Company and its subsidiaries to which he is entitled.    

·

Termination by Company For Cause or by Mr. Mininberg Other Than For Good Reason.  If Mr. Mininberg’s employment was terminated for cause by the Company or other than for good reason by Mr. Mininberg, then he would have been entitled to receive (1) any portion of unpaid base salary earned but not yet paid to him as of the date of termination and (2) any unpaid incentive payment earned by Mr. Mininberg with respect to any award under the 2011 Bonus Plan or the 2008 Stock Plan prior to the effective date of termination.

·

Termination by Mr. Mininberg For Good Reason or by Company Other Than For Cause.  If Mr. Mininberg’s employment was terminated by Mr. Mininberg for good reason or by the Company other than for cause, then he would have been entitled to receive: (1) any portion of unpaid base salary or other benefit earned but not yet paid to him as of the date of termination (except that no benefit or other compensation with respect to any awards under 2011 Bonus Plan or the 2008 Stock Plan shall be payable), (2) a single payment in the amount of $4,000,000 payable in 18 equal installments commencing on the first payroll date that is at least 60 but not more than 75 days after the date of termination and on a monthly basis thereafter, and (3) to the extent permitted by benefit plans of the Company and its subsidiaries, and applicable law, the continuation of health insurance benefits under COBRA for Mr. Mininberg and his family for a maximum of 18 months after the date of termination or until Mr. Mininberg is covered by or eligible for coverage under another health insurance policy, if that occurs earlier than 18 months.  All payments and benefits due to Mr. Mininberg, other than any portion of unpaid base salary and any payment or benefit otherwise required by any rule or regulation issued by any state or federal governmental agency, will be contingent upon Mr. Mininberg’s execution of a general release of all claims to the maximum extent permitted by law against the Company, its affiliates and their respective and former directors, employees and agents pursuant to the Employment Agreement.

 

The Compensation Committee believes the severance provisions of the Employment Agreement arewere a competitive compensation element in the current executive labor market at the time the Employment Agreement was negotiated and arewere necessary because the Employment Agreement doesdid not provide for any retirement benefits for Mr. Mininberg following his termination with the Company. As noted above, the Employment Agreement significantly reduceslimited the potential severance payable to our Chief Executive Officer over the term of the Employment Agreement for the termination events described in the preceding paragraph. The Employment Agreement did not contain the provision of any payment that is linked to a change of control of the Company. However, the Compensation Committee can provide for the acceleration of equity awards to our Chief Executive Officer based on a “double trigger,” which means that the acceleration of those awards would generally occur if, during the employment period, the named executive officer’s employment was involuntarily terminated by the Company other than for cause or by the named executive officer for good reason, in each case, within a specified period following a change of control or if the equity award is not assumed or substituted in connection

with the change of control. On March 1, 2016, the New Employment Agreement became effective, which amends certain post-termination benefits our Chief Executive Officer is eligible to receive. For further information, see “– Fiscal Year 2017 Compensation Changes.”

 

31



Table of Contents

The Company’s Compensation Program for our Other Named Executive Officers

 

Messrs. Benson and Carson were ourOur other named executive officers for fiscal year 2014.  Effective May 1, 2014,2016 are Mr. Grass, Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Benson, was promoted to Chief Operations Officer, Mr. Grass was promoted to Chief Financial Officer, and Mr. Carson, was promoted to Chief Legal Officer.  Therefore, Messrs. Benson, GrassOfficer and Carson are our current other executive officers.Secretary. None of these named executive officers is party to an employment agreement.  As a result, their compensation is reviewed and determined by the Compensation Committee on an annual basis. The Compensation Committee may also review an executive officer’s compensation if that executive officer is promoted or experiences a change in responsibilities.

 

Our other named executive officers report directly to our Chief Executive Officer who supervises the day to day performance of those officers. Our Chief Executive Officer annually reviews our executive compensation program (other than for himself) and makes compensation recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to the other named executive officers, among others. The Compensation Committee strongly considers the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer in making its decisions and any recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to non-CEO compensation, incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans that are approved by the Board.  Additionally, for fiscal year 2014,2016, the Compensation Committee used the Compensation Peer Group and other survey data in order to assist the Compensation Committee in evaluatingevaluated compensation trends and market practice for the non-CEOother named executive officers.

 

Pay for Performance.

 

The Compensation Committee believes that a significant portion of compensation to our named executive officers should be “at risk” based on the financial performance of the Company and the individual performance of the executive. The Compensation Committee also believes that the performance compensation should promote both a near- and long-term outlook.  For fiscal year 2014, approximately 59 percent and 65 percentAs a result, each of the total compensation of Mr. Benson and Mr. Carson, respectively, were tied to performance. For additional information regarding these bonuses, see “– The Company’s Compensation Program for Other Named Executive Officers – Annual Incentive Awards for our Other Named Executive Officers.”

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Following the promotions of Messrs. Benson, Carson and Grass in the first quarter of fiscal year 2015, the Compensation Committee modified the compensation package of theseother named executive officers to allow each of themis eligible to earn a cash annual incentive award and a mix of long-term performance-based andincentive awards, similar to the compensation structure of our Chief Executive Officer. Additionally, each of the other named executive officers is eligible to earn time vested long-term incentive awards in the form of equity, similar to the compensation structure of our Chief Executive Officer.equity. Multiple performance criteria have been established for both annual performance awards (based on adjusted net income growth and net sales growth)targets) and long termlong-term performance

32



Table of Contents

awards (based on adjusted earnings per share growth, adjusted cash flow productivity and relative total shareholder return)return targets). For fiscal year 2015,2016, approximately fifty-three61, 61, and 64 percent (53%), fifty-two percent (52%), and fifty percent (50%) of the targettotal compensation of Messrs. Grass, Benson and Carson, and Grass, respectively, iswere tied to performance. For additional information regarding these incentive awards, see “– The Company’s Compensation ProgramAnnual Incentive Awards for our Other Named Executive Officers – Fiscal Year 2015 Target CompensationOfficers” and “– Long-Term Incentive Awards for our Other Named Executive Officers.”

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

 

Elements of Our Compensation Program for Our Other Named Executive Officers

 

The principal components of compensation for our other named executive officers in fiscal year 20142016 were:

 

·                  Base salary;

 

·                  Bonuses, includingAnnual performance-based incentive bonuses;

 

·                  Long-term equity compensation; and

 

·                  Other personal benefits.

 

The Company had no pre-established policy or target for the allocation between eitherMessrs. Grass, Benson, and Carson are each eligible to earn a cash annual incentive award and non-cash or short-terma mix of performance-based and time-vested long-term incentive compensation.  Rather,awards in the form of equity, similar to the compensation structure of our Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee reviewedused compensation data for similar positions in the performance of the Company and the individuals and determined the appropriate level and mix ofbenchmarked Compensation Peer Group, as well as survey data, as a guide to setting fiscal year 2016 compensation elements.  We currently havetargets for these executive officers. In fiscal 2016, we had no severance plans or arrangements in place for our other named executive officers. Additionally, the Compensation Committee approved the payment of discretionary cash bonuses to our other named executive officers in fiscal year 2016.

Base Salary of Our Other Named Executive Officers

 

The Company provides our other named executive officers with a base salary to provide a fixed amount of compensation for regular services rendered during the fiscal year.  In setting or increasing base salaries, the Compensation Committee strongly considers the recommendations made by our Chief Executive Officer.  In addition, the committee considers each executive’s job responsibilities, qualifications, experience, performance history and length of service with the Company and comparable salaries paid by our competitors.  The Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, change the base salary of other named executive officers based on that named executive officer’s performance.  FollowingIn recognition of their respective increased responsibilities assigned to them during fiscal year 2015, and the recommendation of the formerour Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee approved an increase in Messrs. Benson’sGrass’s and Carson’s annual base salary of $50,000from $350,000 to $375,000 and $10,000 respectively, infrom $375,000 to $450,000, respectively. For fiscal year 2014.2016, the annual base salary of Mr. Benson also received $69,231 in additional base salary for his services as Interim Chief Executive Officer.remained at $600,000.

 

Annual PerformanceIncentive Awards for Our Other Named Executive Officers

 

Performance-basedOur other named executive officers are eligible to earn a cash annual incentive award. These awards are intended to align our executives’ interests with our annual corporate goals. AnnualAfter considering the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer, for fiscal year 2016, the Compensation Committee established multiple performance criteria for the cash annual incentive bonuses take into accountaward of each other named executive officer.

The fiscal year 2016 bonus opportunity was based on the achievement of adjusted income and net sales targets, with no annual incentive award to be paid if the threshold adjusted income was not met. Adjusted income is calculated based on net income without Significant Items. The Compensation Committee values both individual and corporate performance, includinggoals as important to the Company’s earnings.  While the amount of funds available for distribution as bonuses varies with Company earnings, the actual amount that may be distributed was subjectively determined insuccess. For fiscal year 2014 considering recommendations made by2016, the Compensation Committee set the threshold, target and maximum adjusted income and net sales values at the following levels:

Performance Metric

Threshold

Target

Maximum

Adjusted Income

$124.0 million

$138.0 million

$148.0 million

Net Sales

$1,350.0 million

$1,510.0 million

$1,570.0 million

The annual incentive threshold, target and maximum award for each of Messrs. Grass, Benson, and Carson are based upon a percentage of such respective executive officer’s base salary as follows:

Name

Threshold

Target

Maximum

B. Grass

32.5%

65%

130%

T. Benson

32.5%

75%

150%

V. Carson

32.5%

65%

130%

For adjusted income and net sales results that fall between the threshold and the target and the target and maximum values, the payout percentage of the award of each other named executive officer is calculated as a percent of the target amount using a non-linear curve.

Eighty percent (80%) of the annual incentive award is based on the achievement of the adjusted income performance measure and twenty percent (20%) is based on the achievement of the net sales performance measure.  If the adjusted income threshold had not been achieved, because of the importance the Compensation Committee places on adjusted income, no bonus would have been earned or payable with respect to fiscal year 2016. Additionally, none of our other named executive officers is entitled to that portion of the bonus attributed to any performance measure if the threshold amount associated with such performance measure is not achieved. For a discussion concerning the Compensation Committee’s decisions relating to the establishment of these performance measures, see “– Our Fiscal Year 2016 Compensation Program for our Chief Executive Officer – Performance-Based Incentive Awards for our Chief Executive Officer – Annual Incentive Awards.”The adjusted income and reviewed bynet sales targets are subject to adjustment in the event that the Company or any of its subsidiaries consummates an acquisition of the stock or assets of another entity or business or divests any stock or assets of the Company or its subsidiaries. The Compensation Committee.Committee believes these adjustments properly modify performance results under the 2011 Bonus Plan to account for the impact of acquisitions and divestitures.

 

The adjusted income and net sales targets are subject to adjustment in the event that the Company or any of its subsidiaries consummates an acquisition of the stock or assets of another entity or business or divests any stock or assets of the Company or its subsidiaries. The Compensation Committee believes these adjustments properly modify performance results under the 2011 Bonus Plan to account for the impact of acquisitions and divestitures.

For fiscal year 2014,2016, the former Chief Executive Officer established an annual incentive target for each of Messrs. BensonCompensation Committee exercised its discretion to negatively adjust the adjusted income and Carson, which is expressed as a percentage of the executive’s base salary paid during fiscal year 2013.  For fiscal year 2014, the annual incentive target was set at 50 percent for both Messrs. Benson and Carson.  As a result, Mr. Benson’s target bonus opportunity was $268,750, and Mr. Carson’s target bonus opportunity was $148,750.

After the end of fiscal year 2014, the Chief Executive Officer reviewed the Company’s financial results and condition and each executive officers’ individual performancenet sales amounts for fiscal year 2014.  No specific weights were applied2016 used in the determination of the bonus payout percentage, decreasing the amounts by approximately $2,680,000 and $4,057,000, respectively, due to any factor.  The Chief Executive Officer notedthe beneficial impact that the Company performed admirably in fiscal year 2014, despite a challenging environment.  This was evidenced by, among other things,hyperinflation had on the Company’s financial performance based in both sales andVenezuelan operating results. Following these adjustments, for purposes of determining the bonus payout percentage, the Company’s adjusted EBITDA.  In addition, Mr. Bensonincome was  given increased responsibilities during fiscal year 2014, including serving as the Interim Chief

33



Table of Contents

Executive Officer$145,719,000, representing 105.6 percent of the Company, expanding his rolestarget measure and resulting in investor relations and human resources and assisting the Company in its Chief Executive Officer transitiona payout percentage relating to that target of 149.8 percent, and the continued integration of Kaz, Inc. Mr. Carson’s management responsibilities also increased in fiscal year 2014, as evidenced by his assistance with Board of Director matters, the recent leadership transition, the oversightCompany’s net sales were $1,541,644,000, representing 102.1 percent of the Company’s compliance with new regulatory matters, the continued integrationtarget measure and resulting in a payout percentage relating to that target of Kaz, Inc., and the drafting and negotiation of key new licenses and renewals.

As a result of this analysis and considering the individual performance of these executive officers described above, the Compensation Committee approved an annual incentive award percentage payout for each of Messrs. Benson and Carson of 100 percent of their target annual incentive opportunity. The Compensation Committee also determined that the individual performance of the executive officers through the leadership transition and based on each executive’s significant achievements described above merited additional performance payments above their target annual incentive opportunity.111.6 percent. As a result, the Compensation Committee approved an annual incentive awarded at the discretionaward payout for each of the Compensation Committee of $500,000 and $300,000 to Messrs. Grass, Benson and Carson of $340,662, $639,736 and $398,502, respectively. In approving these bonuses,These awards represent a blended payout percentage of 142.2 percent of the Compensation Committee compared the total compensation packagestarget award of Messrs. Benson and Carson for fiscal year 2014, including all annual incentive compensation, to persons working in similar positions ateach other public companies, considering the Compensation Peer Group and other survey data produced by Mercer, Towers Watson and Hewitt. This analysis showed the fiscal year 2014 target compensation of  Messrs. Benson and Carson was below the 25th percentile with respect to the positions that they served in fiscal year 2014.named executive officer.

 

Long-Term Equity CompensationIncentive Awards for Our Other Named Executive Officers

 

At the 2008 annual general meeting of shareholders, the Company’s shareholders approved the 2008 Stock Plan, which the Company uses to grant equity awards to its named executive officers and to key employees.  Equity-based compensation and ownership give these individuals a continuing stake in the long-term success of the Company, and the delayed vesting of stock options helps to encourage retention.  The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors believe that the executive officers and key employees of the Company should be rewarded for earnings performance that may result from their efforts and believethat this should be accomplished, in part, by awarding equity compensation to these individuals, which increaseincreases their stake in the Company’s long-term success and further alignaligns their interests with those of shareholders.  For more information regarding the Company’s long-term equity compensation, see “Executive Compensation – Equity Compensation Plan Information.”

 

AtAfter considering the 2008 annual general meeting of shareholders, the Company’s shareholders also approved the 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2008 ESPP”). All employees that own less than five percentrecommendations of the total combined voting power or valueChief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee also established multiple performance criteria for the long-term incentive awards in the form of all classes of stockequity RSUs for each other named executive officer. Fifty percent (50%) of the Company or any of its subsidiaries are eligible to participate in the 2008 ESPP, including the named executive officers.  During fiscal year 2014, Thomas J. Benson, one2016 Performance RSU awards were based on the achievement of the adjusted earnings per share growth performance measure, twenty-five percent (25%) of the fiscal year 2016 Performance RSU awards were based on the achievement of the adjusted cash flow productivity performance measure and twenty-five percent (25%) of the fiscal year 2016 Performance RSU awards were based on the achievement of the relative total shareholder return performance measure.  None of our other named executive officers participated in the 2008 ESPP.  Under the plan, employees areis entitled to purchase sharesthat portion of the Company’s Common Stock at a discountaward attributed to market value.any performance measure if the threshold amount associated with such performance measure is not achieved.  The purchase price is 85 percentvalues of the closing sale pricethreshold, target and maximum award for each of the Common StockMessrs. Grass, Benson, and Carson’s Performance RSUs are as follows:

Name

Threshold

Target

Maximum

B. Grass

$131,250

$262,500

$525,000

T. Benson

$187,500

$375,000

$750,000

V. Carson

$187,500

$375,000

$750,000

The Compensation Committee also granted time-vested RSUs that will vest fifty percent (50%) on NASDAQ on either the first day or last day of each option period, whichever is less.  As of February 28, 2014, 158,213 shares remain available2017 and fifty percent (50%) on February 28, 2018.  The time-vested RSUs are targeted at $87,500, $125,000, and $125,000 in value, respectively, for issuance underfiscal year 2016 for Messrs. Grass, Benson, and Carson.

Discretionary Cash Bonuses

The Compensation Committee granted each of Messrs. Grass and Carson a discretionary cash bonus of $70,000 and $95,000, respectively, in fiscal year 2016. They were awarded these bonuses in recognition of their substantial efforts provided to the 2008 ESPP.Company during fiscal year 2016 that were beyond their normal responsibilities.  For an additional discussionMr. Grass, the Compensation Committee also considered his significant work in connection with implementing the Company’s strategic plan and the Company’s successful acquisitions and related integration.   For Mr. Carson, the Compensation Committee also considered his significant work on the Company’s acquisitions and dispute resolution matters relating to our former chief executive officer during the fiscal year. A holiday bonus of the material terms$2,500 was also awarded to each of the 2008 ESPP, see “Executive Compensation – Equity Compensation Plan Information - Employee Stock Purchase Plan.”Mr. Grass, Mr. Benson, and Mr. Carson in fiscal year 2016.

 

Other Benefits Provided for Our Other Named Executive Officers

 

We provide other benefits to the other named executive officers, such as participation in a 401(k) plan, including matching contributions, group medical, group life and group dental insurance, as well as vacation and paid holidays.  These benefits are available to all our employees, including each named executive officer, and we believe they are comparable to those provided at other companies.  Additionally, in fiscal year 2014 a holiday bonus

Potential Post-Termination and Change of $2,500 was awarded each of Mr. Benson and Mr. Carson.

34



Fiscal Year 2015 Target CompensationControl Benefits for our Other Named Executive Officers.Officers

 

Following the promotions of Messrs. Benson, Carson and GrassThe Company did not previously have any formal employment or severance agreements with any other named executive officer in the first quarter of fiscal year 2016. In the event any other named executive officer is terminated, the payment of any cash severance would be at the discretion of the Company, based upon the facts and circumstances at that time.

For stock options granted to our other named executive officers prior to August 19, 2015, their base salaries were increasedthe date on which the 2008 Stock Plan (as amended and restated) was approved by our shareholders, any unvested options immediately vest upon a change of control of the Company (as defined under the plan) pursuant to $600,000, $375,000, and $350,000, respectively.the provisions of the Helen of Troy 2008 Stock Incentive Plan in effect prior to August 19, 2015 (the “Prior 2008 Stock Plan”). In addition, if an option holder’s employment with the Company is terminated due to his death or disability, to the extent the participant was entitled to exercise the option on the date of death or disability, the option may be exercised within one year after such termination. If an option holder’s employment is terminated voluntarily or with cause, all of his options that are exercisable as of the date of termination will remain exercisable for ninety days under the Prior 2008 Stock Plan. Additionally, if an option holder’s employment is terminated without cause, all of his options that are exercisable as of the date of termination will remain exercisable for ninety days, regardless of whether they are incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options. Beginning in fiscal year 2016, the Compensation Committee modified the compensation package of these executive officersdoes not plan to allow each of themgrant stock options to earn a cash annual incentive award and a mix of performance-based and time vested long-term incentive awards in the form of equity, similar to the compensation structure of our Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee used compensation data for similar positions in the Compensation Peer Group, as well as survey data, as a guide to setting fiscal year 2015 compensation targets for theseother named executive officers.

 

After considering the recommendationsAny unvested time-vested RSUs granted to our other named executive officers prior to August 19, 2015, would accelerate upon a change in control of the Chief Executive Officer,Company. Additionally, any unearned Performance RSUs granted to our other named executive officers prior to August 19, 2015 would vest pro rata based upon target performance and the number of days elapsed during the performance period at the time of the change in control. In the event of the death or disability or in the event of the termination of the employment for fiscal year 2015,any reason following a change in control, each of the Compensation Committee has established multiple performance criteria forother named executive officers would receive the cashpro rata portion of his annual incentive award he would have received had he remained employed for the entire year in which his employment was terminated.

Any equity awards granted on or after August 19, 2015 to our other named executive officers would accelerate based on a “double trigger,” which means that the acceleration of those awards would generally occur if, during the employment period, the other named executive officer’s employment is involuntarily terminated by the Company other than for cause or by the other named executive officer for good reason, in each executive officer. Eighty percent (80%)case, within a specified period following a change of control or if the annual incentiveequity award is based onnot assumed or substituted in connection with the achievementchange of the net income growth performance measure and twenty percent (20%) will be based on the achievement of the net sales growth performance measure. The annual incentive threshold, target and maximum award for each of Messrs. Benson, Carson, and Grass is based upon a percentage of such respective executive officer’s base salary as follows:

Name

Threshold

Target

Maximum

T. Benson

37.5%

75%

150%

V. Carson

25%

50%

100%

B. Grass

30%

60%

120%

After considering the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer, thecontrol.  For further information, see “Equity Compensation Committee has also established multiple performance criteria for the long-term incentive awards in the form of equity RSUs for each executive officer. Fifty percent (50%) of the fiscal year 2015 long-term incentive awards will be based on the achievement of the adjusted earnings per share growth performance measure, twenty-five percent (25%) of the fiscal year 2015 long-term incentive awards will be based on the achievement of the adjusted cash flow productivity performance measure and twenty-five percent (25%) of the fiscal year 2015 long-term incentive awards will be based on the achievement of the relative total shareholder return performance measure. The Compensation Committee will also grant time based RSUs that will vest fifty percent (50%) on the second anniversary of the date of grant and fifty percent (50%) on the third anniversary of the date of grant. The Compensation Committee has targeted these long-term incentive awards at $500,000, $438,000, and $280,000 in value, respectively, for fiscal year 2015 for Messrs. Benson, Carson and Grass, of which seventy-five percent (75%) will be granted as performance RSUs and twenty-five percent (25%) will be granted as time based RSUs.Plan Information.”

 

The Company’sFiscal Year 2017 Compensation Program for its Former Chief Executive OfficerChanges

 

Separation Agreement

Following the negative vote of our shareholders on our executive compensation program at the 2013 annual general meeting, the Compensation Committee began implementing new compensation policies and practices described below to address shareholder concerns. In connection with those efforts, theConsultant for Fiscal Year 2017 Compensation Committee began discussions with Mr. Rubin to revise his compensation package. Mr. Rubin did not agree to any revisions to his compensation package that the Compensation Committee believed would alleviate shareholder concerns. On January 14, 2014, Gerald J. Rubin notified the Board of Directors of the Company that he would immediately step down as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company.  In connection with his departure, Mr. Rubin also resigned as a director of the Company, effective January 14, 2014.  Our former Chief Executive Officer’s compensation was governed by an employment agreement that became effective October 11, 2011, after the approval by our shareholders of certain proposed compensation plans at the 2011 annual general meeting of shareholders integral to the Rubin Employment Agreement.

35



On January 14, 2014, the Company entered into a separation agreement with Gerald Rubin (the “Separation Agreement”).  Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, Mr. Rubin ceased serving as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President and resigned as a director of the Company, effective January 14, 2014, but remained as an employee of the Company until February 28, 2014.  Under the Separation Agreement, Mr. Rubin’s employment with the Company was considered a termination without cause under the terms of the Rubin Employment Agreement.  As a result, in connection with the termination of his employment, Mr. Rubin received the amounts or payments due to him under the Rubin Employment Agreement for a termination of employment without cause as of February 28, 2014.  No severance payments or other compensation was paid to Mr. Rubin in connection with the resignation of his employment other than severance compensation strictly provided under the Rubin Employment Agreement.

Pay for Performance

 

The Compensation Committee believes that performance basedretained FW Cook as its independent compensation alignsconsultant to assist in the evaluation of the compensation packages of our chiefChief Executive Officer and the other named executive officer’s interests with our annual corporate goals and that substantially all of his compensation should be performance-based considering the scope and level of his business responsibilities.  Forofficers for fiscal year 2014, Mr. Rubin’s performance compensation was based on a balanced mix of equity and cash awards. Under the Rubin Employment Agreement and related compensation programs,2017. FW Cook worked directly with the Compensation Committee used targeted, performance-based compensation goals for our former Chief Executive Officer.  These targets are specific performance goals that were approved by our shareholders at the 2011 annual general meeting, which are designed(and not on behalf of management) to incorporate performance criteria that promote our short-term and long-term business strategies, build long-term shareholder value and avoid encouraging excessive risk-taking.  For fiscal year 2014, approximately 96 percent of Mr. Rubin’s total compensation (other than severance) was tied to Company performance.

GRAPHIC

Elements of the Compensation Program for Our Former Chief Executive Officer

The principal components of compensation for our former Chief Executive Officer in fiscal year 2014 were:

·base salary;

·performance-based incentive bonuses;

·performance-based equity grants;

·limited perquisites and other personal benefits; and

·post-termination benefits.

36



The Compensation Committee reviewed the total compensation for the former Chief Executive Officer annually and evaluated his performance.  Each year, the Compensation Committee also certified that the amounts of any bonus payments under the 2011 Bonus Plan have been accurately determined and that the performance targets approved by the shareholders, and any other material terms previously established by the Compensation Committee, were in fact satisfied.  The Compensation Committee believes that performance-based compensation should constitute a substantial portion of Mr. Rubin’s total compensation.  As a result, the former Chief Executive Officer’s base salary historically represented a very small percentage of the former Chief Executive Officer’s total compensation, and it continued to do so under the Rubin Employment Agreement. Historically, Mr. Rubin’s total compensation has been primarily performance-based and tied directly to the profitability of the Company.  In addition, Mr. Rubin’s performance-based compensation consisted of a mix of cash and equity to provide an appropriate balance of incentives to achieve both the short-term and long-term goals of the Company.

Former CEO Employment Agreement

The Rubin Employment Agreement replaced a prior employment agreement with Mr. Rubin and remedied several problematic governance and pay practices.  Among other things, the Rubin Employment Agreement had a fixed term that would have expired on February 28, 2015, eliminating an evergreen provision in Mr. Rubin’s prior employment agreement that renewed the term of his agreement on a daily basis for three years.  Additionally, although historically substantially all of Mr. Rubin’s compensation has been performance based, the Rubin Employment Agreement changed the short-term elements and goals for our Chief Executive Officer’s incentive compensation and set new long-term performance measures with compensation payable in the form of restricted stock and restricted stock units that were earned based on the achievement of shareholder-approved performance goals and are subject to time vesting.   We presented the provisions of the Rubin

Employment Agreement to our shareholders in connection with that vote, and our shareholders voted overwhelmingly in favor ofanalyze the compensation ofreceived by our named executive officers, describedand assisted in our 2011 proxy statement and those compensation programs submittedestablishing a peer group for which a benchmarking study was conducted. FW Cook has not performed any other services for the shareholders’ approval.  Our shareholders also voted in favorCompany nor undertaken any projects on behalf of the compensation of our named executive officers (including the Rubin Employment Agreement) described in our 2012 proxy statement. However, at the 2013 annual general meeting, the shareholders voted against the compensation of our named executive officers described in our 2013 proxy statement, including the compensation Mr. Rubin received pursuant to the Rubin Employment Agreement. For further information concerning the Rubin Employment Agreement, see “Executive Compensation—Employment and Separation Agreements of Former Chief Executive Officer and President.”

Base Salary of Our Former Chief Executive Officer

The Rubin Employment Agreement set Mr. Rubin’s base salary at $600,000 per year.  Mr. Rubin’s salary remained at this level since 1999, with no increases for inflation or cost of living adjustments.management. The Compensation Committee did not seekhas determined that FW Cook had no conflicts of interest relating to increase Mr. Rubin’s salary because it believes that the majority of his compensation should be attributed to the pre-established performance goals of the Company.

Performance-Based Incentive Bonuses for Our Former Chief Executive Officer

The Compensation Committee believes that performance-based awards align our executives’ interests with our annual corporate goals.  The Compensation Committee also believes that a significant portion of performance-based compensation at the chief executive level is important to the success of the Company and to provide a form of incentive-based compensation to Mr. Rubin.  Accordingly, with respect to fiscal year 2014, Mr. Rubin was entitled to receive, subject to the achievement of specific performance conditions, an annual incentive bonus and the transfer of a life insurance policy.  The 2011 Bonus Plan and the specific performance conditions related to the annual incentive bonus and the transfer of the insurance policy were approved by the Company’s shareholders at the 2011 annual general meeting of shareholders.

37



During fiscal year 2014, Mr. Rubin participated in the 2011 Bonus Plan for which he was entitled to receive an annual bonus with respect to the fiscal year ending February 28, 2014, based on the achievement of a graduated percentage of Adjusted EBITDA consisting of operating income (loss) before impairment charges plus depreciation and amortization charges,  in each case, as determined in accordance with GAAP plus the amount of Mr. Rubin’s bonus (without giving effect to

any bonus received in respect of a transfer of Insurance Policies, as defined below) accrued during the applicable year.  The Compensation Committee set Mr. Rubin’s performance bonus on this metric because it is a meaningful measure of the Company’s operating results and its ability to service its financial obligations and fund growth. The Adjusted EBITDA formula was subject to adjustment in the event that the Company or any of its subsidiaries consummates an acquisition of the stock or assets of another entity or business or divests any stock or assets of the Company or its subsidiaries.

Any annual bonus that was earned and payable was to be paid two-thirds in the form of cash or cash equivalents up to a maximum of $10,000,000.  To further encourage a long-term focus on sustainable performance, the remainder of the bonus was paid in the form of restricted stock up to a maximum of $15,000,000.  All grants of restricted stock were under the 2008 Stock Plan and vested, with respect to Mr. Rubin’s bonus for fiscal years 2013 and 2014, on February 28, 2015, in each case subject to Mr. Rubin’s continued employment with the Company (other than in the case of certain termination events as described below). Pursuant to the Rubin Employment Agreement, as a result of Mr. Rubin’s termination of employment, the restricted stock granted to Mr. Rubin immediately vested.  All Performance RSUs for which the applicable performance conditions had not been achieved as of the date of termination were forfeited.

With respect to fiscal year 2014, the Rubin Employment Agreement and the 2011 Bonus Plan provided that a life insurance policy (Sun Life Insurance Policy) and the obligation to pay the associated premiums was transferred to a trust established by Mr. Rubin subject to the Company meeting performance conditions based on EBITDA ROIC (as defined below).  The amount of the annual bonus and value of the transfer of the life insurance policy (based on cash surrender value) was capped under the 2011 Bonus Plan at $4,000,000.

For fiscal year 2014, Adjusted EBITDA for the Company as computed under the 2011 Bonus Plan was approximately $179.2 million, which resulted in a bonus payout of $12,541,779.   The bonus was paid $8,361,186 million in cash and the remaining value in the form of 62,304 shares of restricted stock.   For more information regarding the 2011 Bonus Plan, see “Executive Compensation – Employment and Separation Agreements of Former Chief Executive Officer and President.”  For fiscal year 2014, EBITDA ROIC for the Company as computed under the 2011 Bonus Plan was approximately 9.5 percent.  Accordingly, the Sun Life Insurance Policy with a value of $3,094,232 was transferred to a trust established by Mr. Rubin following the certification of the achievement of the performance goalsengagement by the Compensation Committee.

 

Equity-Based Compensation for Our Former Chief Executive Officer

The Compensation Committee believes that executive compensation should be linked, in part, to building long-term shareholder value. This objective is met by providing long-term incentives in the form of equity-based awards, such as performance-based restricted stock units. These grants make the performance of the Company’s Common Stock a targeted incentive. As part of this objective, pursuant to the RubinAmended and Restated Employment Agreement Mr. Rubin received 700,000 restricted stock units (the “Performance RSUs”) in March 2012 that were available to be earned over three years if certain performance goals were achieved. If earned, the Performance RSUs then would vest over the remaining term of the Rubin Employment Agreement, subject to earlier termination of employment.  These performance goals were based on the achievement of a graduated percentage of the ratio (‘EBITDA ROIC”), which is defined as (1) operating income (loss) after impairment charges, plus depreciation and amortization charges (subject to certain adjustments) to (2) average invested capital. The Compensation Committee elected to base the earning of the Performance RSUs on this performance metric because it measures how effectively the Company is using its invested capital to generate positive returns for the Company.  The Compensation Committee structured the earned Performance RSUs so that they would continue to vest over time (subject to earlier termination of employment) in order to provide an effective incentive for our CEO to remain with the Company and continue performance.  For fiscal year 2014, EBITDA ROIC was approximately 9.5 percent.  As a result, 100,000 Performance RSUs were earned with respect to fiscal year 2014 performance.   Pursuant to the Rubin Employment Agreement, as a result of Mr. 

38



Rubin’s termination of employment, these Performance RSUs vested on April 22, 2014 upon the Compensation Committee’s certification of the achievement of the performance goals.  For additional information regarding the performance conditions for the Performance RSUs, see “Executive Compensation—Employment and Separation Agreements of Former Chief Executive Officer and President.”

Limited Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits for Our Former Chief Executive Officer

In fiscal year 2014, the Company provided our Chief Executive Officer with limited perquisites and other personal benefits.  The Rubin Employment Agreement also provided that the Company must pay or reimburse Mr. Rubin for reasonable travel and other expenses incurred by him in performing his obligations under the Rubin Employment Agreement.  The Company also provided other benefits to Mr. Rubin, such as participation in a 401(k) plan, including matching contributions, group medical, group life, and group dental insurance, as well as vacation and paid holidays.  These benefits are available to all our employees, including each named executive officer, and we believe they are comparable to those provided at other companies.  In fiscal year 2014, with approval of the Board of the Directors, the Company paid $37,666 in personal legal fees on Mr. Rubin’s behalf during the fiscal year in connection with compensation related matters.  Mr. Rubin’s personal benefits in fiscal year 2014 also included the economic benefit received for executive and survivorship life insurance policies, which totaled $36,963.  During fiscal year 2014, the Board of Directors directed that premium payments in the amount of $90,417 be made towards the policy year commencing March 2, 2014, with respect to the split-dollar life insurance policy that was transferred to Mr. Rubin upon his separation from the Company.

Severance for Our Former Chief Executive Officer

 

Pursuant to the Separationits terms, Mr. Mininberg’s Employment Agreement Mr. Rubin’s employment withwas scheduled to expire on March 1, 2016. During his tenure as Chief Executive Officer, the Company was considered a termination without cause underhas experienced tremendous growth in revenue and in market capital. Mr. Mininberg’s leadership and performance during this time has been integral to the terms of the Rubin Employment Agreement.Company’s success. As a result, the Board determined that it was in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to extend the term of his employment agreement.  The Compensation Committee engaged the services of independent counsel and FW Cook, its independent compensation consultant, to negotiate a revised employment agreement with Mr. Mininberg. The Company entered into the New Employment Agreement with Mr. Mininberg on January 7, 2016, which took effect on March 1, 2016, and extended the term of his employment through February 28, 2019. The Compensation Committee believes the revised compensation program of Mr. Mininberg remains closely aligned with the interests of the shareholders and reflective of the marketplace.

While many of the provisions of the New Employment Agreement match that of Mr. Mininberg’s former Employment Agreement, certain compensation provisions were amended. These changes include the following:

Element

Compensation Changes

Reasoning for Changes

Base Salary

Increased from $900,000 to $950,000.

The Compensation Committee elected to increase Mr. Mininberg’s base salary as a result of his demonstrated strong performance as our Chief Executive Officer, the Company’s strong financial performance during his time as Chief Executive Officer, and the leadership and direction he provides to our employees.

Annual Incentives and Bonuses

Target annual performance bonus at 200 percent of base salary, with the opportunity to earn up to $3,050,000 and a threshold achievement payout of 100 percent of his base salary. However, the Compensation Committee determines the performance goals and other terms for the annual performance bonus.

The Compensation Committee increased the maximum annual incentive bonus Mr. Mininberg is eligible to receive to correspond to the increase in his base salary.

Long-Term Incentives

Long-term performance bonus consists of both time-vesting RSUs (25 percent of the total bonus, vesting in equal installments over a three year period) and Performance RSUs (75 percent of the total bonus), as opposed to solely consisting of Performance RSUs. However, the Compensation Committee determines the performance goals and other terms for the long-term performance bonus. Additionally, the Compensation Committee may increase or decrease targets, thresholds or maximums for these awards.

Target long-term performance bonus at the lesser of $3,200,000 or the value of the common shares that may be granted to a participant under the 2008 Stock Plan (the “Maximum Grant Amount”).

Target Performance RSU portion of the long-term performance bonus at the difference of the Maximum Grant Amount less the fair market value of the time-vested RSU portion of the long-term performance bonus (with a threshold award of 50 percent and a maximum award of 200 percent of the target Performance RSUs granted under the 2008 Stock Plan).

The changes made to the Mr. Mininberg’s long-term incentives were made to reflect what the Compensation Committee believes is a competitive market level for this element of compensation consistant with our goal to align Mr. Mininberg’s interests to building long-term shareholder value.

Element

Compensation Changes

Reasoning for Changes

Severance Benefits in the Event of Termination by Mr. Mininberg for Good Reason or by the Company other than for Cause (and not in Connection with a Change of Control)

Severance benefits of earned and vested incentive compensation plus the following (not to be less than $4,000,000 in the aggregate):

(1)  a cash payment of two times base salary at the time of termination;

(2)  a pro rata annual incentive bonus for the year in which the termination occurred, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its reasonable discretion;

(3)   a pro rata portion of any outstanding Performance RSU’s based upon the actual performance of the Company during the applicable performance periods; and

(4)  a pro rata portion of any installment of time-vesting RSUs that would have vested as of the anniversary of the grant date that immediately follows the date of termination.

Generally, the new severance payments were in lieu of a $4,000,000 cash payment under the former Employment Agreement.

The Compensation Committee believes the severance provisions of the New Employment Agreement are a competitive compensation element in the current executive labor market and are more beneficial to the Company and its shareholders than conducting an individual negotiation with our Chief Executive Officer in the event of a termination of his employment.

Severance Benefits in the Event of Termination by Mr. Mininberg for Good Reason or by the Company other than for Cause (and in Connection with a Change of Control)

Severance benefits of earned and vested incentive compensation plus the following (not to be less than $4,000,000 in the aggregate):

(1)  a lump-sum cash payment of two times: (i) base salary at the time of the change of control or the date of termination, whichever is higher, plus (ii) an amount equal to the target annual incentive under the 2011 Bonus Plan for the performance period in which his employment terminated;

(2) a pro rata annual incentive bonus for the year in which the termination occurred, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its reasonable discretion;

(3) accelerated vesting of all unvested, time-vesting RSUs as of the date of termination;

(4) accelerated vesting at target of all outstanding, unearned, Performance RSUs as of the date of termination; and

(5) certain heath insurance benefits.

The Compensation Committee added the change of control severance benefits to provide incentive for our Chief Executive Officer to fully consider potential changes that are in the best interest of the Company and our shareholders, even if such changes would result in the executive’s termination. The Company competes for executives in a highly competitive market in which companies routinely offer similar benefits to senior executives. The Compensation Committee views these amounts as reasonable and appropriate for the Chief Executive Officer, who may not be in a position to obtain comparable employment following a change of control.

Accelerated Vesting in the Event of a Change of Control

In the event any outstanding equity awards issued pursuant to the 2008 Stock Plan are not assumed in connection with a change of control, such awards will vest immediately in accordance with the terms of the 2008 Stock Plan.

The Compensation Committee added this benefit to provide incentive for our Chief Executive Officer to fully consider potential changes that are in the best interest of the Company and our shareholders.

Element

Compensation Changes

Reasoning for Changes

Modified Tax Gross-Up

In the event of any severance payment to Mr. Mininberg that constitutes “parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and would be subject to excise taxes imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, a “best-of” calculation will be made comparing (a) the total benefit to Mr. Mininberg from the payments after consideration of the excise tax, to (b) the total benefit to Mr. Mininberg if the payments are reduced to the extent necessary to avoid being subject to the excise tax. Mr. Mininberg will be entitled to the payments under the more favorable outcome, as calculated in the Company’s reasonable judgment.

The Compensation Committee believes this provision is a competitive compensation element in the current executive labor market.

Severance Arrangements

In March 2016, the Compensation Committee authorized the Company to enter into severance arrangements with the other named executive officers, which the Company expects to complete during fiscal year 2017. The severance agreements would include the following terms:

·                  For a termination by the Company without cause (not in connection with a change in control), the other named executive officer will receive (1) cash severance equal to his base salary plus his target annual incentive award for the year in which the termination occurred, (2) the pro rata portion of his employment, Mr. Rubin receivedannual incentive award for the amounts or payments due to him underyear in which the Rubin Employment Agreement for a termination occurred based upon the actual performance of employment without cause as of February 28, 2014.  No severance payments or other compensation was paid to Mr. Rubin in connection with the resignationCompany during the performance period, (3) the pro rata portion of his employmentoutstanding long-term incentive awards based upon the actual performance of the Company during the applicable performance periods, (4) pro rata acceleration of all time-vested equity awards held by the other than severance compensation strictly provided under the Rubin Employment Agreement.  Under the Rubin Employment Agreement, as a result of Mr. Rubin’s employment being terminated without “cause”  Mr. Rubin is entitled to a lump sum payment of $15,000,000, which is payable in cash or shares of Common Stocknamed executive officer that are not vested at the Compensation Committee’s discretion.  The Compensation Committee has determined to pay the severance in sharestime of Common Stock.  In addition, as described above, the restricted stock that had been granted to Mr. Rubin in connection with his annual bonuses under the 2011 Bonus Plantermination, and (5) to the extent previously earned, the Performance RSUs immediately vested.  Allpermitted by benefit plans of the 500,000 Performance RSUsCompany and its subsidiaries, and applicable law, the continuation of health insurance benefits under COBRA for which the applicable performance conditions had not been achieved ashim and his family for a maximum of 12 months after the date of termination were forfeited.or until he is covered by or eligible for coverage under another health insurance policy, if that occurs earlier than 12 months.

 

Equity Grant Practices·

Grants of stock options are made without regard to anticipated earnings or other material announcements                  For a termination in connection with a change in control (whether by the Company.  UnderCompany without cause or by the 2008 Stock Plan,other named executive officer for good reason within two years of the exercise pricechange in control), the other named executive officer will receive (1) cash severance equal to 150 percent of stock options grantedboth his base salary and his target annual incentive award for the year in which the termination occurred, (2) the pro rata portion of his target annual incentive award for the year in which the termination occurred, (3) acceleration of all time-vested equity awards held by the other named executive officer that are not vested at the time of termination, (4) acceleration of all unvested performance-based equity awards at target held by the named executive officder at the time of termination (5) a modified tax gross-up similar to that received by our Chief Executive Officer, and (6) to the extent permitted by benefit plans of the Company and its subsidiaries, and applicable law, the continuation of health insurance benefits under the plan may not be less than the closing priceCOBRA for him and his family for a maximum of our Common Stock on NASDAQ on18 months after the date of the grant.  The vesting period of optionstermination or until he is covered by or eligible for other named executive officers has historically been over a five year period at the graduated rate per year of 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 percent.  coverage under another health insurance policy, if that occurs earlier than 18 months.

The Compensation Committee believes these severance provisions are a competitive compensation element in the current executive labor market and are more beneficial to the Company and its shareholders than conducting an individual negotiation with each executive officer in the event of a termination of his employment.  Furthermore, the Compensation Committee believes the change of control severance benefits provide incentive for our executive officers to fully consider potential changes that are in the best interest of the Company and our shareholders, even if such changes would result in the executive’s termination.  The Company competes for executives in a highly competitive market in which companies routinely offer similar benefits to senior executives.  As a result, the Compensation Committee views these vesting terms encourage retentionamounts as reasonable and appropriate for the executive officers.

Base Salary Increase of our executive officers.  TheChief Financial Officer

For fiscal year 2017, the Compensation Committee may, however, adjustalso approved a base salary increase of $60,000 for Mr. Grass because the vesting of options as it deems necessary under the circumstances.  Our Compensation Committee normally determines any annual grantsbelieves his compensation was below market levels and in recognition of stock options to other named executive officers and employees on the next business day following the filing of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K.his performance.

39



 

Stock Ownership Guidelines

 

Beginning in May 2014, our executive officers, including the continuing named executive officer’s,officers became subject to the stock ownership and holding requirements. TheOur Chief Executive Officer is required to own Common Stock equal in value to at least three times his annual salary, and each other named executive officer is required to own Common Stock equal in value to at least one times his annual salary. For purposes of these requirements, ownership includes not only shares owned directly by the executive, but also shares covered by in-the-money stock options that are vested or exerciseable within 60 days of the date of determination and certain units held through various plans and programs of the Company. We have also established milestone guidelines that we use to monitor progress toward meeting these targets over a five-year period, at the end of which the executive is expected to have reached the applicable ownership level.

 

Until an executive reaches the applicable milestone, he or she must hold and may not sell any shares (except to meet tax withholding obligations); once the ownership level is met, he or she must hold and may not sell shares if doing so would cause his or her ownership to fall below that level. Although the Company does not require its executive officers to hold Common Stock for specified periods of time, we believe that the above holding requirements result in the ownership by our executives of significant amounts of Common Stock for substantial periods of time and align the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders. For fiscal year 2016, all our named executive officers met their stock ownership requirements.

 

Prohibition on Pledging and Hedging and Restrictions on Other Transactions involving Common Stock

 

Beginning in fiscal year 2013, ourOur Insider Trading Policy prohibits Board members and our named executive officers from pledging Common Stock or using Common Stock as collateral for any margin loan.  In addition, the Insider Trading Policy contains the following restrictions:

 

·                  Board members and our named executive officers are prohibited from engaging in transactions (such as trading in options) designed to hedge against the value of the Company’s Common Stock, which would eliminate or limit the risks and rewards of the Common Stock ownership;

 

·                  Board members and our named executive officers are prohibited from short-selling the Common Stock, buying or selling puts and calls of the Common Stock, or engaging in any other transaction that reflects speculation about the Common Stock price or that might place their financial interests against the financial interests of the Company;

 

·                  Board members and our named executive officers are prohibited from entering into securities trading plans pursuant to SEC Rule 10b5-1 without pre-approval; further, no Board member or any named executive officer may trade in our Common Stock without pre-approval; and

 

·                  Board members and our named executive officers may trade in Common Stock only during open window periods, and only after they have pre-cleared transactions.

 

Currently, none of our Directors or executive officers has any pledging arrangements in place involving Common Stock.

 

Tax Implications of Executive Compensation

 

Section 162(m) of the Code places a limit of $1,000,000 on the amount of compensation that a company may deduct in any one year with respect to its principal executive officer and each of its other three most highly paid executive officers other than the Chief Financial Officer.  There is an exception to the $1,000,000 limitation for performance-based compensation that meets certain requirements.  Annual cash incentive compensation and stock optionequity awards are generally forms of performance-based compensation that meet those requirements and, as such, are fully deductible.

Grants of stock options to our other named executive officers under our 2008 Stock Plan and the grant of the Performance RSUs are intended to comply with Section 162(m) for treatment as performance-based compensation.  Therefore, we expect to be able to deduct compensation of our named executive officers related to compensation with respect to these grants.

 

40



The incentive cash bonus payments to our former Chief Executive Officer and our new Chief Executive Officer under the 2011 Bonus Plan are intended to be designed to comply with Section 162(m) for treatment as performance basedperformance-based compensation. Section 162(m) allows companies to deduct, for federal income tax purposes, certain performance-based compensation over $1,000,000. The material terms of the performance goals for the awards under the 2011 Bonus Plan must be approved by the shareholders every five years in order for the Company to be

eligible to deduct for tax purposes the incentive awards paid under those plans. The Company’s shareholders originally approved the terms of the 2011 Bonus Plan at the 2011 annual general meeting.  At the Annual Meeting, the Company has proposed that the shareholders approve the Amendedmeeting and Restated 2011 Annual Incentive Plan, including the performance goals for the awards under the plan.  This plan will amendapproved an amendment and restaterestatement of the 2011 Bonus Plan.Plan at the 2014 annual general meeting.

 

The Compensation Committee has considered and will continue to consider tax deductibility in structuring compensation arrangements.  However, the Compensation Committee retains discretion to establish executive compensation arrangements that it believes are consistent with the principles described earlier and in the best interests of our Company and its shareholders, even if those arrangements may not be fully deductible under Section 162(m).

 

41



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The following table sets forth the summary of compensation during fiscal years 20122014 through 20142016 for the Company’s Interim Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, former Chief Executive Officer and one other executive officerofficers whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 and who waswere serving as an executive officer at the end of the fiscal year 20142016 (such persons referred to collectively, as the “named executive officers”).

 

Summary Compensation Table

Summary Compensation Table

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Incentive

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock

 

 

Option

 

 

Plan

 

 

All Other

 

 

 

 

Name and Principal

 

 

 

 

 

Salary

 

 

Bonus

 

 

Awards

 

 

Awards

 

 

Compensation

 

 

Compensation

 

 

Total

 

Position

 

 

Year

 

 

($)

 

 

($)

 

 

($)(2)(3)

 

 

($)(3)

 

 

($)(2)(4)

 

 

($)(5)

 

 

($)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thomas J. Benson    (1)

 

 

2014

 

 

606,731

 

 

771,250

 

 

-

 

 

89,978

 

 

-

 

 

12,855

 

 

1,480,814

 

Interim Chief Executive Officer, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

2013

 

 

477,499

 

 

241,250

 

 

-

 

 

109,245

 

 

-

 

 

12,901

 

 

840,895

 

 

 

2012

 

 

410,000

 

 

287,000

 

 

-

 

 

99,098

 

 

-

 

 

11,174

 

 

807,272

 

Vincent D. Carson

 

 

2014

 

 

297,500

 

 

451,250

 

 

-

 

 

89,978

 

 

-

 

 

11,509

 

 

850,237

 

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

 

 

2013

 

 

286,251

 

 

145,626

 

 

-

 

 

109,245

 

 

-

 

 

11,342

 

 

552,464

 

 

 

2012

 

 

275,000

 

 

160,000

 

 

-

 

 

99,098

 

 

-

 

 

11,042

 

 

545,140

 

Gerald J. Rubin     (1)

 

 

2014

 

 

600,000

 

 

-

 

 

4,180,593

 

 

-

 

 

11,455,418

 

 

15,095,953

 

 

31,331,964

 

Former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

 

 

2013

 

 

600,000

 

 

-

 

 

28,692,135

 

 

-

 

 

12,260,590

 

 

86,556

 

 

41,639,281

 

 

 

2012

 

 

600,000

 

 

12,195,071

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

222,179

 

 

13,017,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Incentive

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock

 

Option

Plan

All Other

 

Name and Principal

 

Salary

Bonus

Awards

 

Awards

Compensation

Compensation

Total

Position (1)

Year

($)

($)

($)(2)

 

($)(3)

($)(4)

($)(5)

($)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Julien R. Mininberg

2016

900,000

2,500

1,678,240

(6)

-    

2,558,942

36,842

5,176,524

Chief Executive Officer

2015

910,096

492,500

1,500,000

 

-    

2,387,400

393,264

5,683,260

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brian L. Grass

2016

368,637

72,500

350,000

(7)

-    

340,665

11,410

1,143,212

Chief Financial Officer

2015

339,167

112,500

280,000

 

187,725

273,293

11,418

1,204,103

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thomas J. Benson  

2016

600,000

2,500

500,000

(8)

-    

639,736

12,922

1,755,158

Chief Operations Officer 

2015

591,667

62,500

500,000

 

187,725

595,944

13,055

1,950,891

 

2014

606,731

771,250

-    

 

89,978

-    

12,855

1,480,814

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vincent D. Carson

2016

431,250

97,500

500,000

(8)

-    

398,502

12,922

1,440,174

Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

2015

362,500

137,500

438,000

 

187,725

243,414

12,297

1,381,436

 

2014

297,500

451,250

-    

 

89,978

-    

11,509

850,237


 

(1)         Mr. Rubin resigned as Chief Executive Officer and President ofEffective March 1, 2014, the Company and as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors effective January 14, 2014.appointed Julien Mininberg to serve as the Chief Executive Officer. Effective May 1, 2014, the Board of Directors appointed (1) Brian L. Grass, formerly serving as the Company’s Vice President and Assistant Chief Financial Officer, to serve as the Chief Financial Officer; (2) Thomas J. Benson, servedformerly serving as Interimthe Company’s Chief ExecutiveFinancial Officer, from January 14, 2014 through February 28, 2014.  Julien R. Mininberg was appointedto serve as the Chief ExecutiveOperations Officer; and (3) Vincent D. Carson, formerly serving as the Company’s General Counsel and Senior Vice President, to serve as Chief Legal Officer effective March 1, 2014.and Secretary.

 

(2)         Mr. Rubin’sThese amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Long-term incentive awards were granted in fiscal year 2014 and 2013 bonus, stock awards and non-equity incentive plan compensation were calculated and awarded pursuant to2016 under the terms of  the Rubin Employment Agreement, 2011 Bonus Plan and 2008 Stock Plan.  Mr. Rubin’s fiscal year 2012 bonuses were calculated and awarded pursuant to the 1997 Cash Bonus Performance Plan.  The fiscal year 2014 bonus included the following components:

Bonus Component

Amount ($)

Cash Bonus

8,361,186

Restricted Stock Awards

4,180,593

Total

12,541,779

Under the 2011 Bonus Plan $8,361,186 of Mr. Rubin’s bonus was paid in cash, which is reflected in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column.  The remainder of the bonus was earned in the form of 62,304 sharesPerformance RSUs to Messrs. Mininberg, Grass, Benson and Carson and in the form of stock,time-vested RSUs to Messrs. Grass, Benson and Carson. The reported value of the Performance RSUs is computed based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions, which is reflected in the “Stock Awards” column.  The cash bonus and stock were awarded on April 22, 2014, the date the Compensation Committee“target”. For each of the Company’s Boardnamed executive officers, the ultimate payout for the Performance RSUs can range from zero shares to a maximum of Directors certified that the related performance goals had been achieved.  For further200 percent of target. Further information regarding the stock award, seeawards is included in the tables entitled “Grants of Plan BasedPlan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2014.2016,” “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2016” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information.

 

(3)         These amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Further information regarding the awards is included in the tables entitled “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2014,” “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2014”2016” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information.” Assumptions used in the calculation of the grant date fair value of these options are

discussed in Note (15) to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014,29, 2016, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year then ended, filed with the SEC on April 29, 2014.2016.

42



Table of Contents

(4)         Includes a $3,094,232 life insurance bonus.  PursuantThe amounts in this column represent annual cash incentive bonuses under the 2011 Bonus Plan that were earned in fiscal year 2016. These amounts were accrued in the Company’s financial statements in fiscal year 2016, but were actually paid to the Rubin Employment Agreement, a split-dollar life insurance policy with a cash surrender value of $3,094,232 was transferred to Mr. Rubin  following the dateMessrs. Mininberg, Grass, Benson, and Carson after fiscal year end 2016, when the Compensation Committee certificationcertified that the related performance goals had been achieved. FurtherFor further information regarding this incentive  compensation is included under “Employment and Separation Agreementsthese awards, see “Grants of former Chief Executive Officer and President.Plan Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2016.

 

(5)         This column reports all other compensation for the covered fiscal year that the Company could not properly report in any other column of the Summary Compensation Table.  Details regarding the amounts in this column for fiscal year 2014 are provided in the following table entitled “All Other Compensation for Fiscal Year 2014”.

For fiscal year 2014,2016, the following compensation was paid to our named executive officers, which comprises “All Other Compensation”:

 

All Other Compensation for Fiscal Year 2016

 

 

 

 

 

Name

401(k) Plan
($)

 

Group Life
Insurance
($)

Legal
Fees
($)(A)

Total
($)

Julien R. Mininberg

10,600

1,242

25,000

36,842

Brian L. Grass

10,600

810

-    

11,410

Thomas J. Benson

10,600

2,322

-    

12,922

Vincent D. Carson

10,600

2,322

-    

12,922

All Other Compensation for Fiscal Year 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Life

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group Life

 

 

Legal

 

 

Insurance

 

 

Severence

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

401(k) Plan

 

 

Insurance

 

 

Fees

 

 

Benefit

 

 

Payments

 

 

Total

 

Name

 

 

($)

 

 

($)

 

 

($)(1)

 

 

($)(2)

 

 

($)(3)

 

 

($)

 

Thomas J. Benson

 

 

10,533

 

 

2,322

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

12,855

 

Vincent D. Carson

 

 

10,267

 

 

1,242

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

11,509

 

Gerald J. Rubin

 

 

10,200

 

 

11,124

 

 

37,666

 

 

36,963

 

 

15,000,000

 

 

15,095,953

 


(1)(A)       Represents legal fees paid on Mr. Rubin’sMininberg’s behalf in connection with certain compensation matters.the negotiation of the New Employment Agreement.

 

(2)(6)         Includes amounts attributable19,577 shares, or $1,500,000 of Performance RSUs, which represents the target award, calculated using a price per share of $76.62, the closing market price of the Common Stock on February 27, 2015, the last trading day prior to the economic benefit received for executivedate of grant. At the date of the grant, the maximum potential value of the Performance RSUs, assuming the achievement of the highest level of performance conditions, is 39,154 shares, or $3,000,000.  Also includes 2,000 shares, or $178,240, of a discretionary restricted share award granted and survivorship life insurance policies.  The economic benefitvested on May 8, 2015.  This represents the aggregate grant date fair value of such policies totaled $36,963the award, calculated in fiscal year 2014.  In fiscal year 2014, the Board of Directors directed that premium payments in the total amount of $90,417 be made towards the policy year commencing March 2, 2014accordance with respect to the split-dollar life insurance policy that was transferred to Mr. Rubin upon his separation from the Company.FASB  ASC Topic 718.

 

(3)(7)         PursuantCalculated using a price per share of $76.62, the closing market price of the Common Stock on February 27, 2015, the last trading day prior to the Separation Agreement, Mr. Rubin’s employment withdate of grant. Includes 1,142 shares, or $87,500 of RSUs, which vest over a three-year period, and 3,426 shares, or $262,500 of Performance RSUs, which represents the Company was considered a termination without   cause undertarget award. At the termsdate of the Rubin Employment Agreement.  Undergrant, the Rubin Employment Agreement, as a result of Mr. Rubin’s employment being terminated without “cause”,  Mr. Rubin is entitled to a lump sum payment of $15,000,000, which is payable in cash or sharesmaximum potential value of the Company’sPerformance RSUs, assuming the achievement of the highest level of performance conditions, is 6,852 shares, or $525,000.

(8)         Calculated using a price per share of $76.62, the closing market price of the Common Stock aton February 27, 2015, the Compensation Committee’s discretion.  The Compensation Committee has determinedlast trading day prior to make the severance payment indate of grant. Includes 1,631 shares, or $125,000 of Common Stock.   In connection withRSUs, which vest over a three-year period, and 4,894 shares, or $375,000 of Performance RSUs, which represents the terminationtarget award. At the date of his employment, Mr. Rubin only received the amountsgrant, the maximum potential value of the Performance RSUs, assuming the achievement of the highest level of performance conditions, is 9,788 shares, or payments due to him under the Rubin Employment Agreement for a termination of employment without cause as of February 28, 2014.  No severance payments or other compensation was paid to Mr. Rubin in connection with the resignation of his employment other than severance compensation strictly provided under the Rubin Employment Agreement.$750,000.

43



Table of Contents

For fiscal year 2014,2016, the following plan-based compensation was awarded to the named executive officers:

 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 20142016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All Other

 

 

All Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All Other

All Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated

 

 

Estimated

 

 

Stock

 

 

Option

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated

Stock

Option

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Future Payouts Under

 

 

Future Payouts Under

 

 

Awards;

 

 

Awards;

 

 

Exercise

 

 

Grant Date

 

 

Future Payouts Under

Awards;

Awards;

Exercise

Grant Date

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Equity Incentive

 

 

Equity Incentive

 

 

Number of

 

 

Number of

 

 

or Base

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Non-Equity Incentive

Equity Incentive

Number of

Number of

or Base

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

Plan Awards

 

 

Plan Awards

 

 

Shares of

 

 

Securities

 

 

Price of

 

 

of Stock

 

 

Plan Awards

Plan Awards (1)

Shares of

Securities

Price of

of Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock

 

 

Underlying

 

 

Option

 

 

and Option

 

 

 

Stock

Underlying

Option

and Option

 

 

Grant

 

 

Threshold

 

 

Target

 

 

Maximum

 

 

Threshold

 

 

Target

 

 

Maximum

 

 

or Units

 

 

Options

 

 

Awards

 

 

Awards

 

 

Threshold

Target

Maximum

Threshold

Target

Maximum

or Units

Options

Awards

Awards

Name

 

 

Date

 

 

($)

 

 

($)

 

 

($)

 

 

($)

 

 

($)

 

 

($)

 

 

(#)

 

 

(#)

 

 

($/Sh)

 

 

($)

 

Grant Date

($)

(#)

(#)

(#)

($/Sh)

($)

Julien R. Mininberg

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive Award

3/01/15  (2)

900,000

1,800,000

2,970,000

 

 

 

 

Performance RSUs

3/01/15

 

9,789

19,577

39,154

 

 

1,500,000   (5)

Restricted Share Award

5/08/15

 

2,000  (3)

 

178,240   (3)

Brian L. Grass

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive Award

3/01/15  (2)

119,807

239,614

479,228

 

 

 

 

Performance RSUs

3/01/15

 

1,713

3,426

6,852

 

 

262,500   (5)

Time-Vested RSUs

3/01/15

 

1,142  (4)

 

87,500   (5)

Thomas J. Benson

 

 

5/6/2013 (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,500

 

 

36.030

 

 

89,978

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive Award

3/01/15  (2)

225,000

450,000

900,000

 

 

 

 

Performance RSUs

3/01/15

 

2,447

4,894

9,788

 

 

375,000   (5)

Time-Vested RSUs

3/01/15

 

1,631  (4)

 

125,000   (5)

Vincent D. Carson

 

 

5/6/2013 (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,500

 

 

36.030

 

 

89,978

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gerald J. Rubin

 

 

3/1/2013 (2)

 

 

473,333

 

 

8,474,000

 

 

10,000,000

 

 

236,667

 

 

4,237,000

 

 

15,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,180,593

 

Annual Incentive Award

3/01/15  (2)

140,157

280,313

560,626

 

 

 

 

Performance RSUs

3/01/15

 

2,447

4,894

9,788

 

 

375,000   (5)

Time-Vested RSUs

3/01/15

 

1,631  (4)

 

125,000   (5)

 


 

(1)         The number of shares listed represents long-term equity incentive awards in the form of Performance RSUs. The performance criteria for these awards is based on the achievement of adjusted earnings per share growth, adjusted cash flow productivity and relative total shareholder return, as described in further detail in “Compensation Discussion Analysis.”

(2)         Under the 2011 Bonus Plan, the performance metrics are based on the achievement of adjusted income and net sales targets. For further information regarding these amounts, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” Actual payout for fiscal year 2016 was 142.2 percent of the target amount for each of the named executive officers.

(3)         The amounts shown reflect a discretionary restricted share award to Mr. Benson’s and Mr. Carson’s options were granted under the 2008 Stock Plan with original vesting terms over a five year period at graduated rates per year of 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 percent.Mininberg on May 8, 2015. The amount shown in this column is the aggregate grant date fair value was computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 as required under SEC rules. Assumptions used.

(4)         The amounts shown reflect the number of time-vested RSUs granted to each applicable named executive officer in the calculationfiscal year 2016, which vest 50 percent on each of the second and third anniversaries of the grant date.

(5)         Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of these options are discussed in Note (15) to the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year then ended, filed with the SEC on April 29, 2014.

(2)Under the Rubin Employment Agreement and the 2011 Bonus Plan, Mr. Rubin is eligible to receive an annual bonus for fiscal year 2014, subject to the Company meeting certain performance conditionsawards, based on Adjusted EBITDA (as defined on page 46). The annual bonus is payable two-thirds in the form of cash or cash equivalents, up to a maximum of $10,000,000, and the remainder in the form of restricted stock up to a maximum of $15,000,000. The number of shares of restricted stock that are awarded were based upon the amount of the bonus divided by the fair market value per share of Common Stock on April 22, 2014, the date the Compensation Committee certified theexpected achievement of the performance goals for fiscal year 2014. The amounts in the threshold columns assume the Company achieves the minimum threshold performance metrics for fiscal year 2014. Because a target amount is not determinable, the amounts in the target columns represent the amount of cash and restricted shares that would be paid or delivered if the performance goalstargets, where applicable. These were achieved based on Adjusted EBITDA for fiscal year 2012. The amounts in the maximum columns represent the maximum amount of cash and restricted stock that may be paid or delivered under the 2011 Bonus Plan for fiscal year 2014. The grant date fair value for the restricted stock component represents the aggregate fair value of $67.10 per share on 62,304 shares awarded for fiscal year 2014, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For additional information regarding the performance conditions related to the annual bonus and the vesting of the restricted stock, see “Employment and Separation Agreements of Former Chief Executive Officer and President.”

44



Table of Contents

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to outstanding equity awards at February 28, 201429, 2016 with respect to our named executive officers.

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 20142016

 

 

 

Option Awards

Share Awards

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity Incentive

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plan Awards:

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

Number of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

Market Value

 

 

Equity Incentive

 

 

Market or Payout

 

 

 

 

Securities

 

 

Securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares or

 

 

of Shares or

 

 

Plan Awards:

 

 

Value of

 

 

 

 

Underlying

 

 

Underlying

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Units of

 

 

Units of

 

 

Number of

 

 

Unearned Shares,

 

 

 

 

Unexercised

 

 

Unexercised

 

 

Option

 

 

 

 

 

Stock That

 

 

Stock That

 

 

Units or Other

 

 

Units or Other

 

 

 

 

Options

 

 

Options

 

 

Exercise

 

 

Option

 

 

Have Not

 

 

Have Not

 

 

Rights That Have

 

 

Rights That Have

 

 

 

 

(#)

 

 

(#)

 

 

Price

 

 

Expiration

 

 

Vested

 

 

Vested

 

 

Not Vested

 

 

Not Vested

 

Name

 

 

Exercisable

 

 

Unexerciseable

 

 

($)

 

 

Date (1)

 

 

(#)

 

 

($)

 

 

(#)

 

 

($)

 

Thomas J. Benson (2)

 

 

7,500

 

 

-

 

 

26.14

 

 

5/15/17

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

5,000

 

 

-

 

 

22.46

 

 

8/19/18

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

3,500

 

 

1,500

 

 

18.80

 

 

5/15/19

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

1,875

 

 

5,625

 

 

32.90

 

 

5/17/21

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

750

 

 

6,750

 

 

34.72

 

 

5/1/22

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

7,500

 

 

36.03

 

 

5/6/23

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

Vincent D. Carson (2)

 

 

7,500

 

 

-

 

 

22.46

 

 

8/19/18

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

3,500

 

 

1,500

 

 

18.80

 

 

5/15/19

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

1,875

 

 

5,625

 

 

32.90

 

 

5/17/21

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

750

 

 

6,750

 

 

34.72

 

 

5/1/22

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

7,500

 

 

36.03

 

 

5/6/23

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

Gerald J. Rubin (3)

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

100,000

 

 

6,531,000

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

Option Awards (1)

Share Awards

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity Incentive

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plan Awards:

 

Number of

Number of

 

 

Number of

Market Value

Equity Incentive

Market or Payout

 

Securities

Securities

 

 

Shares or

of Shares or

Plan Awards:

Value of

 

Underlying

Underlying

 

 

Units of

Units of

Number of

Unearned Shares,

 

Unexercised

Unexercised

Option

 

Stock That

Stock That

Units or Other

Units or Other

 

Options

Options

Exercise

Option

Have Not

Have Not

Rights That Have

Rights That Have

 

(#)

(#)

Price

Expiration

Vested

Vested

Not Vested

Not Vested

Name

Exercisable

Unexerciseable

($)

Date (2)

(#)

($)

(#)

($)

Julien R. Mininberg

-    

-    

-    

-      

-     

-     

26,068   (4)

2,485,844   (7)

 

-    

-    

-    

-      

-     

-     

19,577   (6)

1,866,863   (7)

Brian L. Grass

1,200

-    

22.46

8/19/18   

-     

-     

-            

-            

 

1,200

-    

18.80

5/15/19   

-     

-     

-            

-            

 

2,250

1,500

32.90

5/17/21   

-     

-     

-            

-            

 

2,250

2,750

34.72

5/1/22     

-     

-     

-            

-            

 

1,875

5,625

36.03

5/6/23     

-     

-     

-            

-            

 

1,500

6,000

64.19

5/2/24     

-     

-     

-            

-            

 

-    

-    

-    

-      

-     

-     

1,217   (3)

116,053   (7)

 

-    

-    

-    

-      

-     

-     

3,649   (4)

347,969   (7)

 

-    

-    

-    

-      

-     

-     

1,142   (5)

108,901   (7)

 

-    

-    

-    

-      

-     

-     

3,426   (6)

326,703   (7)

Thomas J. Benson

5,000

-    

18.80

5/15/19   

-     

-     

-            

-            

 

5,250

2,250

32.90

5/17/21   

-     

-     

-            

-            

 

3,375

4,125

34.72

5/1/22     

-     

-     

-            

-            

 

1,875

5,625

36.03

5/6/23     

-     

-     

-            

-            

 

1,500

6,000

64.19

5/2/24     

-     

-     

-            

-            

 

-    

-    

-    

-      

-     

-     

2,172   (3)

207,122   (7)

 

-    

-    

-    

-      

-     

-     

6,518   (4)

621,556   (7)

 

-    

-    

-    

-      

-     

-     

1,631   (5)

155,532   (7)

 

-    

-    

-    

-      

-     

-     

4,894   (6)

466,692   (7)

Vincent D. Carson

5,000

-   

18.80

5/15/19   

-     

-     

-            

-            

 

5,250

2,250

32.90

5/17/21   

-     

-     

-            

-            

 

3,375

4,125

34.72

5/1/22     

-     

-     

-            

-            

 

1,875

5,625

36.03

5/6/23     

-     

-     

-            

-            

 

1,500

6,000

64.19

5/2/24      

-     

-     

-            

-            

 

-    

-    

-    

-      

-     

-     

1,903   (3)

181,470   (7)

 

-    

-    

-    

-      

-     

-     

5,709   (4)

544,410   (7)

 

-    

-    

-    

-      

-     

-     

1,631   (5)

155,532   (7)

 

-    

-    

-    

-      

-     

-     

4,894   (6)

466,692   (7)

 


 

(1)         All options granted had five annual vesting periods commencing on the first anniversary of each grant date.  Options granted through May 6, 2013 vested at graduated rates per year of 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 percent. Options granted on May 2, 2014 vested equally at a rate of 20 percent per year.

(2)All options listed in this table have an expiration date ten years from the date of grant.

(2)Mr. Benson’s and Mr. Carson’s options were granted with five equal annual vesting periods commencing on the first anniversary of each grant date at graduated rates per year of 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 percent.

 

(3)         100,000Represents time-vested RSUs granted to Messrs. Grass, Benson and Carson, of Mr. Rubin’swhich fifty percent (50%) vested on March 1, 2016 and fifty percent (50%) will vest on March 1, 2017.

(4)         These shares represent Performance RSUs were earned with respectgranted under the 2008 Stock Plan, based on “target.” The Performance RSUs will vest if the performance conditions under the awards are achieved based on a three-year performance period ending February 28, 2017. Payouts can range from zero shares to fiscal year 2014a maximum of 200 percent of target. The number of shares reflected assumes the target level of performance achievement, which vested upon the Compensation Committee certification of the related EBITDA ROIC goal for fiscal year 2014 on April 22, 2014.  The market or payout forwould result in the Performance RSUs wasvesting at 100 percent of target.

(5)         Represents time-vested RSUs granted to Messrs. Grass, Benson and Carson, which will vest fifty percent (50%) on February 28, 2017 and fifty percent (50%) on February 28, 2018.

(6)  These shares represent Performance RSUs granted under the 2008 Stock Plan, based uponon “target.” The Performance RSUs will vest if the performance conditions under the awards are achieved based on a three-year performance period ending February 28, 2018. Payouts can range from zero shares to a maximum of 200 percent of target. The number of shares reflected assumes the target level of performance achievement, which would result in the Performance RSUs vesting at 100 percent of target.

(7)   Calculated using a price per share of $95.36, the closing market price of the CommonCompany’s common stock as reported by NASDAQ Stock atMarket on February 28, 201429, 2016, the end of $65.31 per share.the Company’s last completed fiscal year.

 

The following table provides information on all exercises of stock options byand vesting of stock awards for our named executive officers during fiscal year 2014:2016:

 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year 20142016

 

 

 

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Name

 

 

Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)

 

 

Value Realized
on Exercise 
($)

 

 

Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)

 

 

Value Realized
on Vesting 
($)

 

Vincent D. Carson

 

 

9,000

 

 

179,770

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

Gerald J. Rubin (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

226,266

 

 

14,777,432

 


(1)Includes 159,666 shares of stock that were earned as part of Mr. Rubin’s 2013 annual bonus and 66,600 Performance RSU’s that were earned in fiscal year 2013 that vested on February 28, 2014 in accordance with the terms of Mr. Rubin’s Employment and Separation Agreements.  The market or payout for stock and Performance RSUs were based upon the closing market price of the Common Stock at February 28, 2014 of $65.31 per share.

 

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Name

Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)

Value Realized
on Exercise
($)

Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)

Value Realized
on Vesting
($)

Julien R. Mininberg (1) 

2,000

178,240

Thomas J. Benson

12,500

792,650

-  

-   

 

 

45



Table of Contents

 

(1)         Fiscal year 2016 restricted share award granted and vested on May 8, 2015 under the 2008 Stock Plan.

EMPLOYMENT AND SEPARATION AGREEMENTS

OF FORMERCONTRACT FOR OUR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT

 

Separation Agreement

On January 14, 2014,Mr. Mininberg and the Company entered into a separation agreement with Gerald Rubin.the Employment Agreement as of January 14, 2014, which became effective March 1, 2014. Pursuant to the SeparationEmployment Agreement, Mr. Rubin ceased servingMininberg was to serve as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President and resigned asfor a Chairmanfixed term through March 1, 2016, subject to earlier termination by either party. The Employment Agreement did not automatically renew at the end of the Board of Directors, effectiveterm. The Company entered into the New Employment Agreement with Mr. Mininberg on January 14, 2014, but remained an employee of7, 2016, which took effect on March 1, 2016, and extended the Company until February 28, 2014. Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, Mr. Rubin’s employment with the Company was considered a termination without cause under the termsterm of his employment agreement with the Company dated September 13, 2011.  As a result, in connection with the termination of his employment,through February 28, 2019. For additional information regarding Mr. Rubin will receive the amounts or payments due to him under the RubinMininberg’s New Employment Agreement and the changes to his compensation for a termination of employment without cause as of February 28, 2014.fiscal year 2017, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Fiscal Year 2017 Compensation Changes.”

 

Annual Incentive Bonus

The Rubin Employment Agreement provided that Mr. Rubin was eligible to receive an annual base salary of $600,000 and receive an annual bonus payable as a mix of cash or cash equivalents and restricted stock pursuant to the 2011 Bonus Plan.  Under the 2011 Bonus Plan, Mr. Rubin’s bonus was based on the Company’s achievement of Adjusted EBITDA.  “Adjusted EBITDA” is defined as operating income (loss) before impairment charges plus depreciation and amortization charges, in each case, of the Company and its subsidiaries, as determined in accordance with GAAP plus the amount of Mr. Rubin’s annual bonus (without giving effect during the applicable year to the expense accrued  in connection with the transfer of Insurance Policies or the Performance RSUs, as defined below).  The Adjusted EBITDA formula was subject to adjustment in the event that the Company or any of its subsidiaries consummated (1) an acquisition of the stock or the operating, income or revenue producing assets of any entity whether through a merger, consolidation, combination, asset purchase or similar transaction or (2) a divestiture of the stock or the operating, income or revenue producing assets of the Company or any subsidiary or other entity consolidated or combined with or included in the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries whether through a merger, consolidation, combination, asset sale, spin-off, or similar transaction.

For fiscal year 2014, Mr. Rubin’s bonus was calculated by multiplying the applicable percentage by Adjusted EBITDA, as set forth in the table below, subject to a maximum bonus of $25,000,000:

Performance Conditions for the Annual Bonus

Original Performance Tier

 

 

 

Adjusted Performance Tier (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount of 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bonus Payable

 

Greater Than

 

 

Less Than or
Equal to

 

 

Performance
 Tier 
Adjustment (1)

 

 

Greater Than

 

 

Less Than or
Equal to

 

 

as a % of 
Adjusted

EBITDA

 

($ in Millions)

 

 

($ in Millions)

 

 

($ in Millions)

 

 

($ in Millions)

 

 

($ in Millions)

 

 

 

 

------

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

35.5

 

 

------

 

 

$

35.5

 

 

0.0%

 

$

-

 

 

$

50.0

 

 

$

35.5

 

 

$

35.5

 

 

$

85.5

 

 

2.0%

 

$

50.0

 

 

$

75.0

 

 

$

35.5

 

 

$

85.5

 

 

$

110.5

 

 

3.5%

 

$

75.0

 

 

$

100.0

 

 

$

35.5

 

 

$

110.5

 

 

$

135.5

 

 

5.0%

 

$

100.0

 

 

$

125.0

 

 

$

35.5

 

 

$

135.5

 

 

$

160.5

 

 

6.0%

 

$

125.0

 

 

$

150.0

 

 

$

35.5

 

 

$

160.5

 

 

$

185.5

 

 

7.0%

 

$

150.0

 

 

$

175.0

 

 

$

35.5

 

 

$

185.5

 

 

$

210.5

 

 

8.0%

 

$

175.0

 

 

------

 

 

$

35.5

 

 

$

210.5

 

 

------

 

 

8.5%

 


(1)Under the terms of the Rubin Employment Agreement, performance tiers are subject to adjustment for acquisitions and divestitures.  On December 30, 2011, the Company acquired the PUR water filtration business from the Procter &

46



Table of Contents

Gamble Company and certain of its affiliates.  Under the terms of the 2011 Bonus Plan, as a result of the acquisition, the performance tiers were adjusted for either (1) the pro rata historical Adjusted EBITDA reported by the acquired business in the four fiscal quarters immediately preceding the acquisition date or (2) if the Compensation Committee determines that the modification of the performance tiers would not be practicable or appropriate to fairly reflect the impact of the acquisition, then the forecasted impact of the acquisition to Adjusted EBITDA.  The adjusted performance tiers reflected in the table above reflect the Adjusted EBITDA, after giving effect to the $35.5 million adjustment required under the 2011 Bonus Plan for the PUR water filtration business acquisition.  In determining the adjustment, the Compensation Committee determined to use the forecasted impact of the PUR water filtration business acquisition based on the fiscal year 2013 annual operating plan for the acquisition.

Mr. Rubin’s annual bonus under the 2011 Bonus Plan is payable two-thirds in the form of cash or cash equivalents, up to a maximum of $10,000,000, and the remainder in the form of restricted stock up to a maximum of $15,000,000 (subject to availability of shares under the 2008 Stock Plan).  For fiscal year 2014, Adjusted EBITDA for the Company as computed under the 2011 Bonus Plan was approximately $179,168,000, which resulted in a bonus payout of $12,541,779.   The bonus was paid in cash of $8,361,186 and the remaining value in the form of 62,304 shares of restricted stock.  Pursuant to the Rubin Employment Agreement, as a result of Mr. Rubin’s termination of employment, the restricted stock granted to Mr. Rubin vested upon the Compensation Committee’s certification of the achievement of the performance goals on April 22, 2014.

Performance RSUs

Pursuant to the Rubin Employment Agreement, in March 2012, Mr. Rubin received a grant of 700,000 restricted stock units (the “Performance RSUs”) under the 2008 Stock Plan. With respect to fiscal year 2014, 200,000 Performance RSUs were available2016, Mr. Mininberg was eligible for an annual performance bonus (the “Fiscal 2016 APB”) payable in cash under 2011 Bonus Plan targeted at $1,800,000, with the opportunity to be earnedearn up to one hundred sixty-five percent (165%) of the target amount and a threshold achievement payout of fifty percent (50%) of the target amount. The Fiscal 2016 APB was based on the Company’s achievement of specified EBITDA ROIC (as defined below) goals, as described below.

Fiscal Year 2014

Performance Conditions for the Performance RSUs

If FYE 2/14
EBITDA ROIC is:

 

 

Units
Earned

 

Greater
than:

 

 

But less
than:

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.00%

 

 

0

 

7.00%

 

 

8.75%

 

 

50,000

 

8.75%

 

 

10.00%

 

 

100,000

 

10.00%

 

 

11.25%

 

 

150,000

 

11.25%

 

 

 

 

 

200,000

 

“EBITDA ROIC” means, a ratio of (1) operatingadjusted income (loss) after impairment charges, plus depreciation(based on net income without Significant Items) and amortization charges, plus, to the extent included in income (loss) above, any impairment charges, in each case,net sales targets. Eighty percent (80%) of the Company and its subsidiaries as determined in accordance with GAAP, but in the case of impairment charges solely to the extent such charges result from capital market and/or economic conditions creating a stock market trigger that requires testing for and recording of impairments under GAAP which cannot be attributed to any fundamental change in the underlying current or expected operating cash flows associated with the impaired assets, as reflected in the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries and the notes thereto (after taking into account the Company’s effective income tax rate) to (2) Average Invested Capital.  “Average Invested Capital” is defined as the sum of total assets (disregarding any impairment charges during the applicable fiscal year), minus total current liabilities, plus indebtedness for borrowed money included in total current liabilities, in each case, of the Company and its subsidiaries as determined in accordance with GAAP, calculated as the simple average during a fiscal yearFiscal 2016 APB was based on the last day of eachachievement of the trailing five fiscal quarters through the endadjusted income performance measure and twenty percent (20%) of the applicable fiscal year, minusFiscal 2016 APB was based on the impairment charges disregarded in determining total assets above.

For fiscal year 2014, operating income (loss) after impairment charges, plus depreciation and amortization charges for the Company was approximately $150,938,000 million.  As a result, 100,000 Performance RSUs were earned with respect to fiscal year2014 performance, with 100 percent vesting upon the Compensation Committee certificationachievement of the EBITDA ROIC goal for fiscal year 2014.  Ofnet sales performance measure. If the 100,000 Performance RSUs earned by Mr. Rubin in fiscal year 2013, 33.4 percent vested upon

47



Table of Contents

the Compensation Committee certification of the EBITDA ROIC goal for fiscal year 2013 and the remaining 66.6 percent vested immediately upon termination of Mr. Rubin’s employment, pursuant to the Rubin Employment and Separation Agreements.  All of the unearned 500,000 Performance RSUs for which the applicable performance conditionsadjusted income threshold had not been achieved, as ofno Fiscal 2016 APB would have been earned or payable. Mr. Mininberg would not have been entitled to a bonus with respect to any performance measure if the date of termination were forfeited.threshold amount associated with such performance measure had not been achieved.

 

Life Insurance BonusLong-Term Incentive Compensation

For fiscal year 2014, the Rubin Employment Agreement provided for the transfer of a life insurance policy on the lives of Mr. and Mrs. Rubin, subject to certain performance conditions.  The amount of the annual bonus and value of the transfer of the policy (based on cash surrender value) is capped under the 2011 Bonus Plan at $4,000,000 for fiscal year 2014.. With respect to fiscal year 2014,2016, Mr. Mininberg is eligible to receive a long-term incentive award for a three-year performance period ending February 28, 2018 (the “Fiscal 2016 LTPB”), pursuant to the Rubin2008 Stock Plan. Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, this award is in the form of a grant of Performance RSUs. The Fiscal 2016 LTPB is targeted at $1,500,000, with the opportunity to earn up to $3,000,000 and a threshold achievement payout of $750,000. The Fiscal 2016 LTPB is based on the 2011 Bonus Plan provided that, contingent uponachievement of adjusted earnings per share growth (based on earnings per share without Significant Items), adjusted cash flow productivity and relative total shareholder return. Fifty percent (50%) of the Company’s EBITDA ROIC (as defined above) exceeding 7.0 percent for fiscal year 2014, the Company will transfer ownership of and assign all rights and the obligation to pay the associated premiums under the policy to a trust established by Mr. Rubin.  For fiscal year 2014, EBITDA ROIC for the Company as computed under the 2011 Bonus Plan was approximately 9.5 percent. Accordingly, the policy was transferred to a trust established by Mr. Rubin following the certification ofFiscal 2016 LTPB is based on the achievement of the adjusted earnings per share growth performance goals by the Compensation Committee on April 22, 2014.  During the termmeasure, twenty-five percent (25%) of the Rubin Employment Agreement, the Company paid the annual premiumsFiscal 2016 LTPB is based on the life insurance policy untilachievement of the policy was transferred, at which time Mr. Rubin was responsible for paying all premiums dueadjusted cash flow productivity performance measure and twenty-five percent (25%) of the Fiscal 2016 LTPB is based on the policy.  During fiscal year 2014,achievement of the Board of Directors directed that premium payments in the amount of $90,417 be made towards the policy year commencing March 2, 2014relative total shareholder return performance measure. Mr. Mininberg is not entitled to a bonus with respect to any performance measure if the split-dollar life insurance policy thatthreshold amount associated with such performance measure is not achieved. In fiscal year 2016, Mr. Mininberg also was transferredentitled to receive a remaining long-term incentive plan payment of $756,178 earned prior to Mr. Rubin upon his separation from the Company.Mininberg’s promotion to Chief Executive Officer, which was subject to a service obligation.

 

Other Benefits. For information regarding other limited perquisites and other benefits provided to Mr. Mininberg pursuant to the Employment Agreement, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Our Fiscal Year 2016 Compensation Program for Our Chief Executive Officer — Limited Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits Provided to Our Chief Executive Officer.”

Employment Termination

Under the Rubin.  The Employment Agreement provided for certain payments and benefits upon Mr. Rubin was entitled to participate in various benefit plans available to all our employees, such as a 401(k) plan (including matching contributions), group medical, group life, and group dental insurance, as well as vacation and paid holidays.  The Rubin Employment Agreement also provided that the Company must pay or reimburse Mr. Rubin for reasonable travel and other expenses incurred by him in performing his obligations under the Rubin Employment Agreement.  These benefits are available to all our employees, including each named executive officer.  In fiscal year 2014, with approval of the Board of the Directors, Mr. Rubin was reimbursed for a total of $37,666 in personal legal fees in connection with compensation related matters.  Mr. Rubin’s personal benefits in fiscal year 2014 also included the economic benefit received for executive and survivorship life insurance policies, which totaled $36,963.

Severance

Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, Mr. Rubin’s employment with the Company was considered a termination without cause under the terms of the Rubin Employment Agreement.  As a result, in connection with theMininberg’s termination of his employment, Mr. Rubin received the amounts or payments due to him under the Rubin Employment Agreementemployment. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Our Fiscal Year 2016 Compensation Program for a termination of employment without cause as of February 28, 2014.  No severance payments or other compensation was paid to Mr. Rubin in connection with the resignation of his employment other than severance compensation strictly provided under the Rubin Employment Agreement.  Under the Rubin Employment Agreement, as a result of Mr. Rubin’s employment being terminated without “cause”,  Mr. Rubin is entitled to a lump sum payment of $15,000,000, which is payable in cash or shares of the Company’s Common Stock at the Compensation Committee’s discretion.  The Compensation Committee has determined to pay the severance payment in shares of Common Stock.

48Our Chief Executive Officer — Potential Post-Termination Benefits for our Chief Executive Officer.”

 



Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

 

The following table summarizes certain equity compensation plan information as of February 28, 2014:29, 2016:

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

remaining available for

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

remaining available for

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

future issuance under

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

future issuance under

 

 

 

Number of securities to

 

 

Weighted-average

 

 

equity compensation

 

 

 

Number of securities to

 

 

Weighted-average

 

 

equity compensation

 

 

 

be issued upon exercise

 

 

exercise price of

 

 

plans (excluding

 

 

 

be issued upon exercise

 

 

exercise price of

 

 

plans (excluding

 

 

 

of outstanding options,

 

 

outstanding options,

 

 

securities reflected in

 

 

 

of outstanding options,

 

 

outstanding options,

 

 

securities reflected in

 

Plan Category

 

 

warrants, and rights (1)

 

 

warrants, and rights (2)

 

 

the first column) (3)

 

 

 

warrants, and rights

 

 

warrants, and rights

 

 

the first column) (1)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

648,875

 

 

$          53.94

 

 

1,948,750

 

 

938,931

 

 

$     33.03

 

 

2,625,288

 

 


 

(1)         Includes 100,000 shares authorized and available for issuance in connection with the settlement of any Performance RSUs earned pursuant to the 2008 Stock Plan and 838,931 stock options outstanding at the end of fiscal year 2014.

(2)The calculation of this price does not take into account the 100,000 shares authorized, granted and available for issuance in connection with the settlement of any Performance RSUs earned pursuant to the 2008 Stock Plan.

(3)Includes 158,21398,652 shares authorized and available for issuance in connection with the 2008 ESPP, 2,350,699Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as defined below), 1,748,638 shares authorized and available for issuance under the 2008 Stock Plan and 116,376101,460 shares authorized and available for  issuance under the 2008 Directors’Director Plan.

 

As of June 2, 2014,May 10, 2016, (1) there were options to purchase 960,962579,365 shares of Common Stock outstanding under the equity compensation plans of the Company; (2) the weighted average exercise price for such outstanding options was $40.90;$55.27; (3) the weighted average remaining term for such outstanding options was 7.155.71 years; and (4) there were 778,050323,001 granted but unvested full-value awards under the equity compensation plans of the Company.

1998 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan

The 1998 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (the “1998 Plan”) was approved by the Company’s shareholders at the 1998 annual general meeting. The Compensation Committee administers the 1998 Plan. Under the 1998 Plan, the Compensation Committee could grant incentive stock options, non-qualified options and restricted stock to our named executive officers, other than our Chief Executive Officer, and to other employees. The number and the nature of equity awards granted to each eligible employee were determined on a discretionary rather than formula basis by the Compensation Committee with the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer. The exercise price for any option granted under the 1998 Plan was at a price that the committee may determine, but could not be less than the average of the highest and lowest sale price of our Common Stock on NASDAQ on the date of the grant.

Holders of stock option awards remaining under the 1998 Plan may exercise their options at any time after they vest and before they expire, except that no awards may be exercised after ten years from the date of grant. Awards are generally not transferable by the recipient during the recipient’s life. Awards granted under the plan were evidenced by either an agreement that was signed by us and the recipient or a confirming memorandum issued by us to the recipient setting forth the terms and conditions of the awards. Award recipients and beneficiaries of award recipients have no right, title or interest in or to any shares subject to any award or to any rights as a shareholder, unless and until shares are actually issued to the recipient.

49



Table of Contents

According to the terms of the 1998 Plan, any unvested options immediately vest upon death, disability or a change in control (as defined in the 1998 Plan) of the Company. In addition, if a participant’s employment with the Company is terminated, any exercisable options held by that employee may be exercised for a period of:

·for both incentive stock options (“ISO’s”) and nonstatutory options (“NSO’s”), up to twelve months if the termination of employment was due to the employee’s death or disability;

·for ISO’s, up to ninety days, where the employee is terminated without cause;

·for NSO’s, up to six months, where the employee is terminated without cause; or

·up to thirty days, if the termination of employment was for any other reason.

The 1998 Plan requires participants to comply with specified confidentiality and non-competition provisions. If the participant violates these provisions, then the participant may be required to forfeit his or her rights and benefits under the 1998 Plan, return to the Company any unexercised options, forfeit the rights under any awards of restricted stock and return any shares held by the participant received upon exercise of any option or the lapse of restrictions relating to restricted stock.

 

2008 Stock Plan

 

The Company’s shareholders approved the 2008 Stock Plan (as amended and restated) at the 2008 annual general meeting of shareholders and certain amendments to the 2008 Stock Plan at the 20112015 annual general meeting of shareholders. The 2008 Stock Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The 2008 Stock Plan permits the granting of stock options, including ISO’s and NSO’s, unrestricted shares of Common Stock, stock appreciation rights (“SAR’s”), restricted stock, restricted stock units, and other stock-based awards. Currently, the maximum number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2008 Stock Plan is 3,750,000 shares and the maximum number of shares with respect to which awards of any and all types may be granted during a calendar year to any participant is limited, in the aggregate, to 1,000,000 shares.shares, subject to adjustment for certain events as described in the plan. The plan will expire by its terms on August 19, 2018. The 2008 Stock Plan provides that if the Chief Executive Officer of the Company is a member of the Board of Directors, the Board of Directors may, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, authorize him or her to grant awards of up to an aggregate of 350,000 shares of Common Stock to employees other than the Chief Executive Officer (subject to adjustment in certain circumstances), provided that any such grants will be subject to the terms and conditions of the Board authorization and that the Chief Executive Officer must notify the Compensation Committee of any such grants. Currently, employees of the Company, its subsidiaries and affiliates and consultants to the Company and its subsidiaries, are eligible to participate in the 2008 Stock Plan.

 

The 2008 Stock Plan provides that the option price pursuant to which Common Stock may be purchased will be determined by the Compensation Committee, but will not be less than the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date the option is granted. No option granted under the 2008 Stock Plan will be exercisable more than ten years after the date of grant. If a participant’s service terminates by reason of death or disability (as defined in the 2008 Stock Plan), to the extent the participant was entitled to exercise the option on the date of death or disability, the option may be exercised within one year after the date of death or disability. If a participant’s service with the Company terminates for any reason (other than death or disability), each option then held by the participant may be exercised within ninety days after the date of such termination, but only to the extent such option was exercisable at the time of termination of service. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Compensation Committee may accelerate the vesting of unvested options held by a participant if the participant is terminated without “cause” (as determined by the Compensation Committee) by the Company.

 

The 2008 Stock Plan also provides for certain terms and conditions pursuant to which restricted stock and restricted stock units may be granted under the 2008

Stock Plan. The vesting of a restricted stock award or restricted stock unit granted under the 2008 Stock Plan may be conditioned upon the completion of a specified period of employment with the Company or a subsidiary, upon attainment of specified performance goals, and/or upon such other criteria as the Compensation Committee may determine in its sole discretion. If a participant’s service is terminated for any reason, the participant will only be entitled to the restricted stock or restricted stock units vested at the time of such termination of service. The participant’s unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units will be forfeited. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Compensation Committee may accelerate the vesting of unvested restricted stock or restricted stock units held by a participant if the participant is terminated without “cause” (as determined by the Compensation Committee) by the Company, provided that with respect to Awards granted to Covered Employees that are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, such acceleration must be done in a manner that complies with Section 162(m) of the Code.

 

50



Table of Contents

The terms and conditions of other stock-based awards will be determined by the Compensation Committee. Other stock-based awards may be granted in a manner that will enable the Company to deduct any amount paid by the Company under Section 162(m) of the Code (“Performance-Based Awards”). Performance-Based AwardsCode. Performance-based awards are rights to receive amounts denominated in cash or shares of Common Stock, based on the Company’s or a participant’s performance between the date of grant and a pre-established future date.

 

Under the 2008 Stock Plan, the acceleration of equity awards to participants is based on a “double trigger”, which means that the acceleration of those awards would generally occur if, during the employment period, the participant’s employment is involuntarily terminated by the Company other than for cause or by the participant for good reason, in each case, within a specified period following a Change of Control (as defined under the plan) or if the equity award is not assumed or substituted in connection with the Change of Control.  In the event of a Change of Control, (as definedwith respect to awards assumed by the surviving entity or otherwise equitably converted or substituted in connection with a Change of Control, if within one year after the effective date of the Change of Control, a participant’s employment is involuntarily terminated other than for cause or by the participant for good reason, then (1) the participant will have the right to exercise or settle from and after the date of termination any option or SAR held by such participant in whole or in part, notwithstanding that such option or SAR may not be fully exercisable or vested, (2) any and all time-based vesting restrictions on such participant’s other stock-based award will lapse and such stock will immediately vest in the participant, notwithstanding that the other stock-based award was unvested and (3) the payout level under such participant’s outstanding stock-based awards that vest in whole or in part based on performance conditions shall be deemed to have been earned as of the date of termination based upon achievement of relevant performance goals or based on performance at the “target” level, either in full or pro rata based upon the length of time within the performance period that has elapsed.

With respect to awards not assumed by the surviving entity or otherwise equitably converted or substituted in connection with a Change of Control, upon the occurrence of the Change of Control, (1) the participant will have the right to exercise or settle from and after the date of the Change of Control any option or SAR held by such participant in whole or in part, notwithstanding that such option or SAR may not be fully exercisable or vested, (2) any and all time-based vesting restrictions on such participant’s other stock-based award will lapse and such stock will immediately vest in the participant, notwithstanding that the other stock-based award was unvested and (3) the payout level under such participant’s outstanding stock-based awards that vest in whole or in part based on performance conditions shall be deemed to have been earned as of the effective date of the Change of Control based upon achievement of relevant performance goals or based on performance at the “target” level, either in full or pro rata based upon the length of time within the performance period that has elapsed.

Any awards granted prior to August 19, 2015 will remain subject to the provisions of the Prior 2008 Stock Plan), (i)Plan. Therefore, for those previously granted awards, if a Change of Control occurs, (1) the participating employeesparticipant will have the right to exercise or settle from and after the date of the Change of Control any option, SAR or restricted stock unit held by such participating employeeparticipant in whole or in part, notwithstanding that such option, SAR or restricted stock unit may not be fully exercisable or vested, and (ii)(2) any and all restrictions on any participating employee’sparticipant’s other stock-based award will lapse and such stock will immediately vest in the participating employee,participant, notwithstanding that the other stock-based award was unvested.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 

At the 2008 annual general meeting, the shareholders approved the Helen of Troy Limited 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2008 ESPP”) and reserved 350,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance under the plan. It is the intention of the Company that the 2008 ESPP qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” under Section 423 of the Code.

 

The purpose of the 2008 ESPP is to provide employees of the Company or its subsidiaries designated by the Board of Directors or the Committee (defined below) (“Designated Subsidiaries”) as eligible to participate in the 2008 ESPP an opportunity to purchase shares of Common Stock and thereby have an additional incentive to contribute to the prosperity of the Company. The aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be sold pursuant to all offerings of the Company’s Common Stock under the 2008 ESPP will not exceed 350,000 shares, as adjusted for any recapitalization or reorganization of the Company as set forth in the 2008 ESPP. The 2008 ESPP provides that eligible full-time employees of the Company or its Designated Subsidiaries may purchase shares of Common Stock with payroll deductions accumulated on behalf of such employees. Employees may authorize payroll deductions of up to 15 percent of their compensation, subject to certain limitations under section 423(b) of the Code, which is accumulated over an option period and then used to purchase Common Stock. Option periods end in February and August of each fiscal year. The purchase price is 85 percent of the closing sale price of the Common Stock on NASDAQ on either the first day or last day of each option period, whichever is less. Employees may suspend or discontinue their participation in the plan at any time.

 

51



Table of Contents

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

 

Former Chief Executive Officer

 

The information below describes certain compensation that would be paid to Mr. Rubin resigned as Chief Executive Officer and PresidentMininberg under the terms of the Employment Agreement, in the event of a termination of his employment with the Company and as a memberand/or change in control of the Company’s BoardCompany.  The amounts shown in the table below assume that such a termination of Directors effective January 14, 2014, but remained an employeeemployment and/or change in control occurred on February 29, 2016 and thus includes amounts earned through such date and are estimates of the Company until February 28, 2014. Pursuantamounts that would be paid out to Mr. Mininberg upon his termination and/or a change in control (based upon his compensation and service levels as of such date).  The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the Separation Agreement, Mr. Rubin’stime of a change in control and/or termination of employment with the Company was considered a termination without cause under the terms of the Rubin Employment Agreement.  As a result, in connection with the termination of his employment, Company. Mr. Rubin received the amounts or payments due to him under the Rubin Employment Agreement for a termination of employment without cause as of February 28, 2014.  No severance payments or other compensation was paid to Mr. Rubin in connection with the resignation of his employment other than severance compensation strictly provided under the Rubin Employment Agreement.  Under the terms of the Rubin Employment Agreement, Mr. Rubin was entitled to any earned and unpaid wages and incentive compensation through the date of termination of the agreement.  Accordingly, with respect to fiscal year 2014 performance, Mr. Rubin wasMininberg would have been entitled to receive earned and unpaid annual incentive compensation of $12,541,779 in connection with his$3,315,120 as of February 29, 2016. This amount represents the annual bonus underincentive compensation of $2,558,942 earned for fiscal year 2016 and the 2011 Bonus Plan,remaining long-term incentive plan payment of $756,178 earned prior to Mr. Mininberg’s promotion to Chief Executive Officer, which was subject to a service obligation, each of which $8,361,186 waswere paid in cash and $4,180,593 was deliveredto Mr. Mininberg in the formfirst quarter of sharesfiscal year 2017.  No additional amounts of annual incentive compensation would have been payable to Mr. Mininberg if the Company experienced a change of control on February 29, 2016. For further information regarding the terms of the Company’s Common Stock.Employment Agreement and a description of Mr. Rubin also receivedMininberg’s potential payments upon termination and/or a change of control, see “Executive Compensation — Employment Contract for our Chief Executive Officer” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Our Fiscal Year 2016 Compensation Program for Our Chief Executive Officer — Potential Post-Termination Benefits for our Chief Executive Officer.”

In addition to any portion of unpaid base salary earned but not yet paid to him as of the date of termination, if Mr.Mininberg’s employment had been terminated as of February 29, 2016, Mr. Mininberg would be entitled to receive the following:

Chief Executive Officer – Julien R. Mininberg

Triggering Event

Compensation Component

How Paid

Payout

Death or Disability (1)

·               Death or disability benefits (2)

Various

Termination for Good Reason or

·               Severance payment (3)

Over time

$4,000,000

without Cause (1) (5) (6)

·               Health benefits (4)

Over time

$38,600

Total

$4,038,600

Change of Control (6)

·               None (6)

Not Applicable

$0


(1)         The terms “disability,” “good reason” and “cause” have the same meanings as defined in the Employment Agreement.

(2)         These represent third party payments from insurers. In the event of death, this would include the payment under a life insurance policy in the amount of $750,000. In the event of disability, the amount of the payment(s) would depend upon the circumstances and nature of the disability, with a maximum payment of $25,000 per month until age 67.

(3)         Under the terms of the Employment Agreement, Mr. Mininberg would receive a severance payment of $4,000,000 payable in 18 equal installments commencing on the first payroll date that is at least 60 but not more than 75 days after the date of termination and on a monthly basis thereafter.

(4)         Reflects the estimated value of $3,094,232.18 monthly COBRA payments. Under the Rubinterms of the Employment Agreement, asto the extent permitted by benefit plans of the Company and its subsidiaries, and applicable law, Mr. Mininberg is entitled to the continuation of health insurance benefits under COBRA for Mr. Mininberg and his family for a resultmaximum of 18 months after the date of termination or until Mr. Mininberg is covered by or eligible for coverage under another health insurance policy, if that occurs earlier than 18 months.

(5)         In the event of Mr. Rubin’s employment being terminatedMininberg’s termination without cause 66,600 Performance RSUsor for good reason, all payments and 159,666 restricted bonus shares that had previously been earned vestedbenefits due to him, other than any portion of unpaid base salary and any payment or benefit otherwise required by any rule or regulation issued by any state or federal governmental agency, will be contingent upon Mr. Mininberg’s execution of a general release of all claims to the maximum extent permitted by law against the Company, its affiliates and their respective and former directors, employees and agents pursuant to the Employment Agreement.

(6)         Reflects payments under the Employment Agreement.  Under the New Employment Agreement, which became effective on February 28, 2014.  In addition,March 1, 2016, the payments to Mr. Mininberg in the event of his termination for good reason, without cause, or in connection with the terminationa change of his employment, Mr. Rubin was entitled to a lump sum severance paymentcontrol were each amended. For additional information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Fiscal Year 2017 Compensation Changes – Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of $15,000,000, which is payable in cash or shares of the Company’s Common Stock at the Compensation Committee’s discretion.  The Compensation Committee has determined to pay the severance payment in shares of Common Stock.our Chief Executive Officer.”

 

Other Named Executive Officers

 

Except for the Rubin Employment Agreement and Separation Agreementsthe New Employment Agreement discussed in “Executive Compensation — Employment and Separation Agreements of FormerContract for our Chief Executive OfficerOfficer” and President”,“Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Fiscal Year 2017 Compensation Changes – Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of our Chief Executive Officer,” the Company did not previously have any formal employment or severance agreements with any named executive officer as of February 28, 2014.officer. In March 2016, the event anyCompensation Committee authorized the Company to enter into severance agreements with the other named executive officer, other than Mr. Rubin, is terminated, the payment of any severance would be at the discretion ofofficers, which the Company based upon the facts and circumstances at that time.expects to complete in fiscal year 2017.

 

Stock optionsAny awards granted to the other named executive officers prior to August 19, 2015 will remain subject to the provisions of the Prior 2008 Stock Plan.  Awards granted to the other named executive officers in fiscal year 2016 on or after August 19, 2015 are subject to the terms of the 1998 Plan for grants issued before August 25, 2008 and the 2008 Stock Plan (as amended and restated).  For information regarding the terms of these plans, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – The Company’s Compensation Program for grants made after August 25, 2008. Under both plans,our Other Named Executive Officers – Potential Post-Termination and Change of Control Benefits for our Other Named Executive Officers” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information.”  In the event of the death or Disability or in the event of the termination of employment for any unvested options immediately vest uponreason following a Change of Control, the other named executive officers would receive the pro rata portion of their annual incentive award they would have received had they remained employed for the entire fiscal year in which their employment was terminated. Each of Messrs. Grass, Benson and Carson would have been entitled to receive earned and unpaid annual incentive compensation of $340,665, $639,736 and $398,502, respectively, as of February 29, 2016.  This amount represents the annual incentive compensation earned for fiscal year 2016, which was paid to Messrs. Grass, Benson and Carson in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017.  No additional amounts of annual incentive compensation would have been payable to Messrs. Grass, Benson and Carson if the Company experienced a change of control of the Company (as defined under each plan). In addition, if an option holder’s employment with the Company is terminated due to his death or disability, all of his options will immediately vest and will remain exercisable for one year after such termination. If an option holder’s employment is terminated voluntarily or with cause, all of his options that are exercisable as of the date of termination will remain exercisable for thirty days for the 1998 Plan and ninety days for the 2008 Stock Plan. Under the 1998 Plan, if an option holder’s employment is terminated without cause, all of his options that are exercisable as of the date of termination will remain exercisable for ninety days, if ISOs, or six months, if NSOs. Under the 2008 Stock Plan, if an option holder’s employment is terminated without cause, all of his options that are exercisable as of the date of termination will remain exercisable for ninety days, regardless of whether ISOs or NSOs.on February 29, 2016.

If the Company experienced a change in control on February 28, 2014, Mr.29, 2016, Messrs. Grass, Benson and Mr. Carson each would have been entitled to receive benefits totaling approximately $688,000 by reasonthe following:

Name

Immediate
Vesting of
Options

Immediate
Vesting of
Time Vested
RSUs

Pro Rata
Vesting of
Performance
RSUs

Brian L. Grass

$781,201

$224,954

$333,792

Thomas J. Benson

$911,426

$362,654

$569,935

Vincent D. Carson

$911,426

$337,002

$518,504

COMPENSATION RISKS

The Company has reviewed and assessed its compensation policies and practices to determine whether they are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company’s management reviews compensation policies for the presence of certain elements that could encourage employees to take unnecessary or excessive risks; the ratios and level of incentive to fixed compensation, annual to long-term compensation and cash to equity compensation; and the comparison of compensation expense to earnings of the immediate vestingCompany. Management’s assessment of their options.the Company’s compensation policies is reviewed by the Compensation Committee as part of its risk oversight function.

 

52



Table of ContentsThe Company believes that its compensation programs for employees and executive officers are appropriately tailored to encourage employees to grow our business, but not to encourage them to do so in a way that poses unnecessary or excessive material risk. In particular, the Company’s compensation programs are designed to provide the following: elements that reward short-term and long-term performance; for our executive officers, incentive compensation that rewards individual and Company performance; incentive or equity compensation awards that vest based on performance and/or over time; and compensation with fixed and variable components, so that executive officers and key employees have both competitive remuneration to encourage retention and opportunities to earn more by successfully executing the Company’s business strategy.

 

Overall, the Compensation Committee does not believe that the compensation policies and practices give rise to risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. In reaching this conclusion, the Compensation Committee noted that:

·                  Our compensation program is designed to provide a balanced mix of base salary, annual cash incentive compensation and long-term equity incentives, which provides the incentive to perform at high levels and maximize Company performance without focusing exclusively on compensation performance metrics to the detriment of other important business metrics;

·                  Our 2011 Bonus Plan provides for authority to adjust the performance targets for annual incentive bonuses and stock incentive awards to take into account acquisitions and divestitures of the Company to reduce the incentive to engage in activities that would have a short-term focus and would be inconsistent with the Company’s long-term business objectives;

·                  Our principal equity compensation plan and our 2011 Bonus Plan include clawback provisions in the event of a financial restatement or misconduct;

·                  The annual cash incentive opportunity for our Chief Executive Officer contains maximum payout levels, which helps avoid excessive total compensation and reduces the incentive to engage in unnecessarily risky behavior; and

·                  Our insider trading policy prohibits executives from pledging Common Stock or using Common Stock as collateral for any margin loan and from engaging in transactions (such as trading in options) designed to hedge against the value of the Common Stock.

Based on the recent actions taken by the Company and considering the support received from a very high percentage of our shareholders who voted in favor of the compensation of our named executive officers described in our 2015 proxy statement (“say on pay”), the Compensation Committee concluded that the executive compensation program is consistent with our executive compensation objectives and principles. As a result, since the 2015 annual general meeting, the Compensation Committee has not significantly changed our compensation principles and objectives in response to that vote.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS - RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

 

Procedures for the Approval of Related Person Transactions

 

The Audit Committee Charter provides that the Audit Committee has the authority to establish, and communicate to the full board and management, policies that restrict the Company and its affiliates from entering into related person transactions without the Audit Committee’s prior review and approval. In accordance with these policies, the Audit Committee on a timely basis reviews and, if appropriate, approves all material related person transactions.

 

At any time in which an executive officer, Director or nominee for Director becomes aware of any contemplated or existing transaction that, in that person’s judgment may be a material related person transaction, the executive officer, Director or nominee for Director is expected to notify the Chairman of the Audit Committee of the transaction. Generally, the Chairman of the Audit Committee reviews any reported transaction and may consult with outside legal counsel regarding whether the transaction is, in fact, a material related person transaction requiring approval by the Audit Committee. If the transaction is considered to be a material related person transaction, then the Audit Committee will review the transaction at its next scheduled meeting or at a special meeting of the committee.

 

Related Person Transactions

 

Byron H. Rubin, JD, CLUThe Audit Committee was not requested to, and Chartered Financial Consultant,  is the brother of the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer and earned insurance agent’s commissions paid by certain of our insurers directlydid not approve, any transactions required to him in connection with certain life insurance policies. During fiscal year 2014, he received commissions of approximately $15,000 from policies sold to the Company.  In addition, Byron Rubin had a consulting agreement with the Company to provide consulting advice and other administrative services related to the Company’s employee benefit plans.  Under the agreement, Byron Rubin received $150,000be reported under SEC rules in fiscal year 2014, paid in equal monthly installments.  The agreement was for a one year term ending February 28, 2014.  The agreement was not renewed.  These transactions have been reviewed, approved and ratified by the Audit Committee and approved by the Board of Directors.2016.

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS

 

Composition.Composition

 

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Audit Committee”) is composed of four Directors: Adolpho R. Telles,Alexander M. Davern, Gary B. Abromovitz, John B. Butterworth, and William F. Susetka.Beryl B. Raff. Each member of the Audit Committee meets the independence and financial experience requirements under both SEC and NASDAQ rules. In addition, the Board has determined that Adolpho R. TellesAlexander M. Davern is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC rules.

 

Responsibilities.Responsibilities

 

The Audit Committee operates under a written charter that has been adopted by the Board. The charter is reviewed annually for changes, as appropriate.

 

The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight, on behalf of the Board of Directors, of:

 

·                  The Company’s auditing, accounting and financial reporting processes, and the integrity of its financial statements;

 

·                  The audits of the Company’s financial statements and the appointment, compensation, qualifications, independence and performance of the Company’s auditor and independent registered public accounting firm;

 

·                  The Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; and

 

·                  The staffing and ongoing operation of the Company’s internal audit function.

 

The Company’s management is responsible for: (a) maintaining the Company’s books of account and preparing periodic financial statements based thereon; and (b) maintaining the system of internal controls. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing the Company’s consolidated annual financial statements.

 

53



Table of Contents

The Audit Committee’s function is one of oversight only and does not relieve management of its responsibilities for preparing financial statements that accurately and fairly present the Company’s financial results and condition, nor the independent registered public accounting firm of their responsibilities relating to the audit or review of the financial statements.

 

In accordance with Audit Committee policy and the requirements of law, the Audit Committee pre-approves all services to be provided by the Company’s auditor and independent registered public accounting firm. Pre-approved services include audit services, audit-related services, tax services, and other services. In some cases, the full Audit Committee provides pre-approval for up to a year related to a particular defined task or scope of work and subject to a specific budget. In other cases, the Chairman of the Audit

Committee has the delegated authority from the Audit Committee to pre-approve additional services, and the Chairman then communicates such pre-approvals to the full Audit Committee for ratification. To avoid potential conflicts of interest, the law prohibits a publicly traded company from obtaining certain non-audit services from its independent registered public accounting firm. The Company obtains these services from other service providers as needed.

 

Report of Audit Committee.Committee

 

The Audit Committee hereby reports as follows:

 

1.              The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, together and separately, the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2014.2016.

 

2.              The Audit Committee has discussed with the auditor and independent registered public accounting firm matters required to be discussed in applicable Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“the PCAOB”) rules. This review included a discussion with management of the quality, not merely the acceptability, of the Company’s accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant estimates and judgments, and the clarity of disclosure in the Company’s financial statements, including the disclosures related to critical accounting estimates.

 

3.              The Audit Committee has received from the auditor and independent registered public accounting firm the written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee has held discussions regarding independence with its auditor and independent registered public accounting firm.

 

Based on the review and discussions referred to in paragraphs 1-3 above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 20142016 for filing with the SEC.

 

Members of the Audit Committee:

 

Adolpho R. TellesAlexander M. Davern (Chairman)

Gary B. Abromovitz

John B. Butterworth

William F. SusetkaBeryl B. Raff

 

The foregoing report of the Audit Committee shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

 

54



Table of Contents

AUDIT AND OTHER FEES FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY OUR INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

The following table presents fees for professional audit services provided by Grant Thornton LLP for the audit of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements for fiscal years ended 20142016 and 2013,2015, and fees for other services provided by Grant Thornton LLP associated with those periods.

 

Type of Fee

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Audit Fees

 

 

$

1,119,700

 

 

$

1,088,000

 

 

 

1,190,100

 

 

$

1,198,700

 

Audit-Related Fees

 

 

3,800

 

 

1,400

 

 

 

-

 

 

1,100

 

Tax Fees

 

 

25,700

 

 

8,800

 

 

 

22,100

 

 

12,500

 

All Other Fees

 

 

20,500

 

 

21,900

 

Total

 

 

$

1,169,700

 

 

$

1,120,100

 

 

 

$

1,212,200

 

 

$

1,212,300

 

 

Audit Fees: Consist of fees for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and review of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports and services that are normally provided by our independent registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, including services in connection with assisting the Company in its compliance with its obligations under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and related regulations and attest services, except those not required by statute or regulation.

Audit-Related Fees: Consist of fees for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, due diligence, accounting consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards, and other similar services which have not been reported as audit fees.

 

Tax Fees: Consist of tax compliance/preparation fees for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm to certain subsidiaries of the Company.

All Other Fees: Consist of fees for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm to the Company for their assistance with the preparation of certain electronic statutory filings in foreign jurisdictions and with the analysis and preparation of certain US state sales tax refund claims.   The Company intends to minimize services in this category.   These services are actively monitored (both spending level and work content) by the Audit Committee to maintain the appropriate objectivity and independence in our independent registered public accounting firm’s core work, which is the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

The Audit Committee pre-approved all of the services described above that were provided in fiscal year 2014years 2016 and 20132015 in accordance with the pre-approval requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. There were no services for which the de minimis exception, as defined in Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, was applicable.

 

55



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 2:  ADVISORY APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are asking shareholders to approve the following advisory resolution at the Annual Meeting:

 

RESOLVED, that the shareholders of Helen of Troy Limited (the “Company”) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the related compensation tables, notes and narratives in the Proxy Statement for the Company’s 20142016 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.

 

This advisory resolution, commonly referred to as a “say on pay” resolution, is non-binding on the Board of Directors.  Although non-binding, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee will review and consider the voting results when making future decisions regarding our executive compensation program.

 

In connection with the 2013 annual general meeting, the Compensation Committee engaged in discussions with Company shareholders to gain input into the compensation elements that were among their top concerns and engaged an independent compensation consultant, Pearl Meyer.  The paramount concern of our shareholders was the level of compensation and other pay practices relating to our former Chief Executive Officer who resigned from that position on January 14, 2014.  As a result, based on the input from our shareholders and the compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee has made a number of significant changes to theOur executive compensation program of Julien R. Mininberg, our new Chief Executive Officer as described in the “Compensation Discussionemphasizes performance- and Analysis” section of this proxy statement.  The Compensation Committee believes that the modificationsequity-based compensation to align it with shareholder interests. In addition, our executive compensation program further aligns the interests of our executive officers with those of our shareholders and eliminates governance and payincludes other practices that the Compensation Committee considered not to be in the bestwe believe serve shareholder interests of our shareholders.   The modifications made to the compensation program for our Chief Executive Officer included, among other actions, entering into an employment agreement with our new Chief Executive Officer designed to address shareholder concerns,such as benchmarking the Chief Executive Officer compensation program against a peer group, paying for performance, establishing rigorous performance goals, setting target executive compensation at market levels, not providing for tax “gross-up” payments, and establishing more rigorous performance goals.  The Boardmaintaining policies relating to clawbacks of Directors also adopted stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers.  Additionaly, theincentive awards and prohibitions on hedging or pledging Company stock.

The Compensation Committee has structured the compensation to our executive officers so that, in large part, it is “at risk” based on the financial performance of the Company and the individual performance of the executive.

As a result of these revised compensation policies and the significant progressbelieves that the Compensation Committee has achieved following the 2013 annual general meeting,Company’s executive compensation programs use appropriate structures and sound pay practices. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee recommends a vote “For” this Proposal 2.

 

We urge shareholders to read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 1920 of this proxy statement, which describes in more detail how our executive compensation policies and procedures operate and are designed to achieve our compensation objectives.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL.

56



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: APPROVAL OF NINE PROPOSALS RELATING TO THE COMPANY’S AMENDED AND RESTATED BYE-LAWS

Shareholders are being asked to consider and approve the adoption of each of the nine proposals described below (Proposals 3A through 3I) to implement the Amended and Restated Bye-laws of the Company (the “Amended Bye-laws”).

Under Section 13 of the Bermuda Companies Act 1981 (the “Companies Act”) and Bye-laws 43 and 84 of our current Bye-laws (the “Bye-laws”), any amendment of the Bye-laws requires approval by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by shareholders present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting.

Background and Reasons for the Amended and Restated Bye-laws

The Company’s Bye-laws were originally adopted in 1993. The Bye-laws have been amended two times: in 2005, to permit meetings and communications by electronic transmission and in 2007, to permit direct registration of shares as required by the Nasdaq listing rules.  Since that time, there have been numerous developments in the laws of Bermuda and the United States and in public company practice that involve matters covered by the Bye-laws. The Companies Act, which is the primary corporate statute that applies to Bermuda companies, has been substantively amended since the adoption of the Bye-laws, including by legislative amendments to the Companies Act in 2006 and 2011.  These legislative amendments made significant changes to the Companies Act for the benefit of Bermuda companies and their shareholders, but in many cases, these benefits are not available until a company’s bye-laws explicitly provide for them. Since the adoption of the Bye-laws, there have also been various changes and updates in corporate governance practices and SEC rules and regulations. For example, in 2007, the SEC, in an effort to take advantage of advances in communications technology, adopted a voluntary “notice and access” system under which issuers can satisfy their proxy delivery requirements by posting proxy materials on an Internet website.

In light of the foregoing, the Board recently reviewed the existing Bye-laws of the Company to determine what changes were necessary or advisable.  A number of clarifications and stylistic revisions were also considered to improve the organization and clarity of the Bye-laws. The intended effect of the proposed Amended Bye-laws, if approved, will be to enable the Company to take advantage of the changes to the Companies Act under Bermuda law and to update its corporate governance practices.  Based on its review, the Board unanimously determined that it was in the best interests of our shareholders to amend and restate the Bye-laws, and the Board approved, and recommended that shareholders approve, such amendment and restatement.

Shareholders will vote separately on each of the nine proposals described below (Proposals 3A through 3I) to amend and restate the Bye-laws. The Amended Bye-laws are set forth in Appendix A to this proxy statement. Shareholders are urged to carefully review Appendix A.

PROPOSAL 3A — ADVANCE NOTICE PROVISIONS FOR DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS AND DIRECTOR ELIGIBILITY

The Company proposes to add new provisions in the Amended Bye-laws requiring advance notice to the Company of shareholder nominations for election of directors to be brought by shareholders before any general meeting of the shareholders and specifying the qualifications that director nominees must meet to be eligible to serve as a director of the Company. The Company’s current Bye-laws do not contain any procedures or requirements for shareholders to nominate directors before a general meeting of the shareholders. Therefore, a shareholder could nominate directors for a shareholder vote at an annual general meeting or special general meeting of the shareholders, without providing the Company, or its shareholders, any advance notice. In addition, any such nomination does not have to be accompanied with important information regarding the background and experience of director nominees.  Accordingly, shareholders may not have critical information regarding director nominees available for their review and consideration prior to a general meeting of the shareholders.

We believe that implementing advance notice procedures and eligibility qualifications for directors will provide an orderly procedure for the notification of the Company of business that is to be presented at shareholders’ general meetings. This will enable the Board to plan shareholder general meetings and result in better information being made available to our shareholders in advance of any general meetings of the shareholders with respect to any director nominees. It will also permit the Board to make a recommendation or statement of its position so as to enable shareholders to better determine whether they desire to attend the general meeting or grant a proxy to the Company as to the election of each director nominee.  In addition, the Company believes that requiring director nominees to meet reasonable eligibility requirements to serve on the board will enable the Company to gain the expertise that suitable director nominees may bring to the Board.

If approved by the shareholders, the Amended Bye-laws would set deadlines and procedures with respect to when and how a shareholder must give advance written notice of a proposed director nomination to be considered at an annual general meeting or a

special general meeting of the shareholders and the director qualifications that nominees must meet in order to be eligible to serve as a director of the Company. Only persons who are nominated to the Board in accordance with the Amended Bye-laws and who meet the director qualifications described in the Amended Bye-laws will be eligible to serve as directors of the Company.  The advance notice provisions and procedures and eligibility requirements include the following key terms.

Director Nominations and Eligibility

·                  Generally, for director nominations to be made at an annual general meeting or special general meeting by a shareholder, the shareholder must (1) provide timely notice in writing and in proper form to the Secretary of the Company at the Company’s principal executive offices, (2) provide any updates or supplements to the notice at the time and in the form required by the Amended Bye-laws, and (3) the shareholder of record and the beneficial owner or owners, if any, on whose behalf any nomination is made, must have acted in accordance with the representations set forth in the notice of director nomination.

·                  To be in proper form, the notice of a director nomination would be required to include, among other things, information about the proposed nominee for director that is required to be disclosed under Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act, information about the shareholder submitting the nomination (including with respect to such shareholder’s ownership of shares of the Company and any interest such shareholder has in any derivative positions or hedging transactions pertaining to shares of the Company’s common stock), and information about any other shareholders or beneficial owners known to support the proposed nomination.

·                  To be eligible to be a nominee for election or reelection as a director of the Company, a proposed nominee must timely deliver to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Company a written questionnaire with respect to the background and qualification of such person and the background of any other person or entity on whose behalf the nomination is being made (which form of questionnaire shall be provided by the Secretary upon written request) and a written representation and agreement (in the form provided by the Secretary upon written request) that, among other things, the proposed nominee and the person or entity on whose behalf the nomination is being made, would be in compliance, if elected as a director of the Company, and will comply with all applicable publicly disclosed corporate governance, conflict of interest, confidentiality and stock ownership and trading policies and guidelines of the Company.

Timely Notice

·                  With respect to an annual general meeting, a shareholder’s notice of a director nomination would be timely if the notice is received by the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Company not less than 60 and not more than 90 days prior to the date of the annual general meeting.

·                  With respect to a special general meeting, a shareholder notice of a director nomination is timely if it is given not later than 10 days following the earlier of the date on which notice of the special general meeting was posted to shareholders or the date on which public disclosure of the date of the special general meeting was made. In no event shall an adjournment, or postponement of a general meeting for which notice has been given, commence a new time period for the giving of a shareholder of record’s notice. For purposes of the Bye-laws, “public announcement” or “public disclosure” means disclosure in a press release reported by a national news service or in a document publically filed by the Company with the SEC pursuant to Section 13, 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

The above summary of the new provisions of the Amended Bye-laws is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of Bye-law 36 and Bye-law 38 of the Amended Bye-laws, a copy of which is attached hereto as Appendix A. Shareholders are urged to read carefully the full text of Bye-law 36 and Bye-law 38 of the Amended Bye-laws.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL 3A: ADVANCE NOTICE PROVISIONS FOR DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS

PROPOSAL 3B — ADVANCE NOTICE PROVISIONS FOR SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS OF BUSINESS (OTHER THAN DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS)

The Company proposes to add a new provision in the Amended Bye-laws requiring advance notice to the Company of shareholder proposals of business (other than director nominations) to be brought by shareholders before a general meeting of the shareholders. The Company’s current Bye-laws do not contain any procedures or requirements for shareholders to propose other business before a general meeting of the shareholders. Therefore, a shareholder could make proposals of business for a shareholder vote at an annual general meeting or special general meeting of the shareholders, without providing the Company, or its shareholders, any advance notice. In addition, any such proposal does not need to be accompanied with important information regarding any such

proposal.  Accordingly, shareholders may not have critical information regarding a proposal for their review and consideration prior to the general meeting of the shareholders.

We believe that implementing advance notice procedures for shareholder proposals will provide an orderly procedure for the notification of the Company of business that is to be presented at shareholders’ general meetings. This will enable the Board to plan general meetings and result in better information being made available to our shareholders in advance of any general meetings of the shareholders with respect to any shareholder proposals. It will also permit the Board to make a recommendation or statement of its position so as to enable shareholders to better determine whether they desire to attend the general meeting or grant a proxy to the Company as to the disposition of any such business. In addition, by requiring advance notice, the Company will be able to carefully review and determine, in advance of a general meeting of the shareholders, whether such proposals are the proper subject matter for a shareholder vote under applicable law.

If approved by the shareholders, the Amended Bye-laws would set deadlines and procedures with respect to when and how a shareholder must give advance written notice of a proposal of business to be considered at an annual general meeting of the shareholders or a special general meeting of the shareholders. The advance notice provisions and procedures include the following key terms.

Shareholder Proposals of Business

·                  Generally, for business to be properly brought before an annual general meeting or special general meeting by a shareholder, (1) the business must otherwise be a proper matter for shareholder action under applicable law and (2) the shareholder must (i) provide timely notice in writing and in proper form to the secretary of the Company at the Company’s principal executive office, (ii) provide any updates or supplements to such notice at the times and in the form required by the Bye-laws and (iii) the shareholder of record and the beneficial owner or owners, if any, on whose behalf any such business proposal is made, must have acted in accordance with the representations set forth in the notice of shareholder proposal of business.

·                  To be in proper form, the notice would be required to include, among other things, information about the proposed business to be brought before the general meeting of shareholders, information about the shareholder submitting the nomination (including with respect to such shareholder’s ownership of shares of the Company and any interest such shareholder has in any derivative positions or hedging transactions pertaining to shares of the Company’s common stock), and information about any other shareholders or beneficial owners known to support the proposal.

·                  Except for proposals made in accordance with the procedures and conditions set forth in Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, the shareholder must be a shareholder of record at the time of giving of notice, must be entitled to vote at the meeting, and must comply with the notice procedures set forth in the Amended Bye-laws.

Timely Notice

·                  With respect to an annual general meeting, a shareholder’s notice would be timely if the notice is received by the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Company not less than 60 and not more than 90 days prior to the date of the annual general meeting.

·                  With respect to a special general meeting, a shareholder notice is timely if it is given not later than 10 days following the earlier of the date on which notice of the special general meeting was posted to shareholders or the date on which public disclosure of the date of the special general meeting was made. In no event shall an adjournment, or postponement of a general meeting for which notice has been given, commence a new time period for the giving of a shareholder of record’s notice. For purposes of the Bye-laws, “public announcement” or “public disclosure” means disclosure in a press release reported by a national news service or in a document publically filed by the Company with the SEC pursuant to Section 13, 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

The foregoing summary of the new provision is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of Bye-law 21 of the Amended Bye-laws, a copy of which is attached hereto as Appendix A. Shareholders are urged to read carefully the full text of Bye-law 21 of the Amended Bye-laws.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL 3B: ADVANCE NOTICE PROVISIONS FOR SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS OF BUSINESS (OTHER THAN DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS)

PROPOSAL 3C — MAJORITY VOTING IN DIRECTOR ELECTIONS EXCEPT PLURALITY VOTING IN CONTESTED DIRECTOR ELECTIONS

The Bye-laws currently require majority voting for all directors.  If a quorum is present, each director nominee receiving a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy shall be elected.  The Amended Bye-laws retain the majority voting requirement for all director elections except contested director elections.  A contested election is defined as the situation in which the number of director nominees exceeds the number of positions on the Board by election at that general meeting.  The Amended Bye-laws provide that in a contested election, directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast. Employing a majority voting standard in a contested election could make it more difficult for any candidate, whether proposed by the Board or by a shareholder, to obtain the number of votes necessary to secure a seat on the Board.  If there were a close vote in such a contested election, it is possible that no candidate would achieve the requisite majority. Accordingly, the Amended Bye-laws add a provision for plurality voting in contested director elections to avoid such a result but maintains the majority voting requirement for uncontested director elections.

The foregoing summary of the new provision is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of Bye-law 28 of the Amended Bye-laws, a copy of which is attached hereto as Appendix A. Shareholders are urged to read carefully the full text of Bye-law 28 of the Amended Bye-laws.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL 3C: MAJORITY VOTING IN DIRECTOR ELECTIONS EXCEPT PLURALITY VOTING IN CONTESTED DIRECTOR ELECTIONS

PROPOSAL 3D — AUTHORIZATION TO FIX NUMBER OF DIRECTORS AND FILLING A VACANCY ON THE BOARD

The Bye-laws currently provide that the Board shall consist of not less than two directors or such number in excess thereof as the shareholders may determine from time to time. The Companies Act permits the Board flexibility to adjust the number of directors on the Board from time to time.  To take advantage of that flexibility, the Amended Bye-laws amend this provision to establish that the Board will fix the number of directors from time to time.  The Bye-laws will continue to provide that the Board shall consist of not less than two directors.

The Amended Bye-laws also add a provision to allow the Board to fill a vacancy on the Board occurring as a result of an increase in the size of the Board.  The Bye-laws currently provide that the Board may fill a vacancy on the Board occurring as a result of the death, disability, disqualification or resignation of any director and to appoint an alternate director to any director so appointed.  Under the Amended Bye-laws, the Board may fill a vacancy on the Board occurring as a result of an increase in the size of the Board.  Any director so appointed would be subject to the nomination of the director by the Board and would serve only until the next general meeting of the shareholders in which directors are elected.  These changes in the Amended Bye-laws allow for greater efficiency and flexibility for the Board to focus the Company’s resources on evaluating candidates at the appropriate time and to take advantage of the expertise that suitable director nominees may bring to the Board on limited occasions when a director position becomes open as a result of a decision to increase the size of the Board.

The foregoing summary of the new provision is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of Bye-law 37 and Bye-law 40 of the Amended Bye-laws, a copy of which is attached hereto as Appendix A. Shareholders are urged to read carefully the full text of Bye-law 37 and Bye-law 40 of the Amended Bye-laws.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL 3D: FILLING A VACANCY ON THE BOARD

PROPOSAL 3E — CASTING OF VOTES

The Amended Bye-laws add a provision that allows a person entitled to more than one vote at a general meeting of shareholders to cast such votes in different ways.  For example, some votes held by a person may be cast in favor of a particular proposal while the remaining votes held by such person may be cast against such proposal. This provision was added to provide flexibility to shareholders in casting votes when, for example, they hold shares in different capacities.

The foregoing summary of the new provision is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of Bye-law 29 of the Amended Bye-laws, a copy of which is attached hereto as Appendix A. Shareholders are urged to read carefully the full text of Bye-law 29 of the Amended Bye-laws.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL 3E: CASTING OF VOTES.

PROPOSAL 3F — APPOINTMENT OF PROXY

The Amended Bye-laws add a provision that the appointment of proxy must be received by the Company at the registered office of the Company or at such other place or in such manner as is specified in the notice convening the meeting or in any instrument of proxy sent out by the Company in relation to the meeting at which the person named in the appointment proposes to vote, and appointment of a proxy which is not received in the manner so permitted shall be invalid.  The Amended Bye-laws further clarify that a shareholder of two or more shares may appoint more than one proxy to represent him and vote on his behalf in respect of different shares.  These provisions were added for orderly administration of shareholders’ general meetings and to provide flexibility to shareholders to cast votes in different ways by appointing different proxies in respect of different shares.

The foregoing summary of the new provision is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of Bye-law 31 of the Amended Bye-laws, a copy of which is attached hereto as Appendix A. Shareholders are urged to read carefully the full text of Bye-law 31 of the Amended Bye-laws.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL 3F: APPOINTMENT OF PROXY.

PROPOSAL 3G — DIRECTOR REMUNERATION

The Amended Bye-laws add a provision to allow the remuneration of the directors to be determined by the Company in general meeting or the Board, providing the Board with greater flexibility and administrative efficiency.  Currently, the Bye-laws provide that the remuneration of the directors shall be determined by the Company in general meeting.

The foregoing summary of the proposed provision is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of Bye-law 41 of the Amended Bye-laws, a copy of which is attached hereto as Appendix A. Shareholders are urged to read carefully the full text of Bye-law 41 of the Amended Bye-laws.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL 3G: DIRECTOR REMUNERATION

PROPOSAL 3H — OTHER CHANGES TO THE BYE-LAWS

Other changes were made to the Bye-laws to include certain provisions permitted by the legislative amendments to the Companies Act, to update provisions in the existing Bye-laws to reflect changes in corporate governance practices and SEC rules and regulations, to combine separate provisions that relate to the same subject, to consolidate related provisions under separate headings, and to clarify the Bye-laws and make them easier to read. Some of these changes are described below:

·Treasury Shares.  Currently, we are required to cancel any shares that we repurchase and, as a result, those shares are not available for later reissuances. As permitted by the legislative amendments to the Companies Act, the Amended Bye-laws would enhance our flexibility by providing that we may hold shares that we repurchase as treasury shares.  (Bye-law 3 of the Amended Bye-laws)

·Transfer of Shares.  The Bye-laws currently provide that the Board may refuse to register a transfer of shares unless applicable consents, authorisations and permissions of any governmental body or agency in Bermuda have been obtained and that the Board shall notify the proposed transferor and transferee within three months of such refusal. In order to clarify the authority of the Board, the Amended Bye-laws provide the Board with the right to refuse to register share transfers of shares which are not fully paid up in its discretion and without assigning any reason therefor. The existing Bye-laws contain several provisions requiring a written instrument for the transfer of shares.  However, the Companies Act allows shares to be transferred without a written instrument if transferred by an appointed agent (within the meaning of the Companies Act) or otherwise in accordance with the Companies Act. This provision was added to the Amended Bye-laws to make clear that the Companies Act’s provision is available to us and our shareholders notwithstanding the Bye-law requirement for a written instrument. The Amended Bye-laws further provide that shares of the Company that are listed or admitted to trading on an appointed stock exchange may be transferred in accordance with the rules and regulations of such exchange.  (Bye-law 11 of the Amended Bye-laws)

·Financial Assistance.  The Bye-laws currently provide that the Company can not give financial assistance for the purpose of a purchase or subscription made or to be made by any person of or for any shares in the Company.  This provision was included in our current Bye-laws because Bermuda law prohibited such financial assistance when the Bye-laws were originally adopted. The legislative amendments to the Companies Act eliminated these financial assistance measures.  Accordingly, the Amended Bye-laws removes these financial assistance restrictions in accordance with the change in Bermuda law which the Board believes will enhance our flexibility.  (Current Bye-law 51(3); deleted in Amended Bye-laws)

·Method of Payment of Dividends.  The Bye-laws currently provide that the Board may declare a dividend to be paid to the shareholders but do not describe procedures regarding the method of payment, such as how payment shall be made to joint holders of shares, rights with respect to unclaimed dividends and whether an unpaid dividend shall bear interest as against the Company.  As a matter of clarification and what the Board believes will be good corporate practice, the Amended Bye-laws provide that dividends may be paid by cheque or draft sent through the post directed to a shareholder at such shareholder’s address in the Register of Members or to such person and to such address as the holder may direct in writing.  With respect to joint holders of shares, such cheque or draft may be sent to the holder first named in the Register of Members or to such person and to such address as the holder may direct in writing, and any one of the holders can give an effectual receipt of payment of such dividend.  The Company will be entitled to cease sending dividend cheques and drafts by post or otherwise to a shareholder if the instruments have been returned undelivered or left uncashed by such shareholder on at least two consecutive occasions or one occasion, if reasonable inquiries have failed to establish the shareholder’s new address, until the shareholder claims a dividend or cashes a dividend cheque or draft.  If a dividend or other moneys payable in respect of a share has remained unclaimed for 7 years from the date when it became due for payment, the Board may resolve that such payment shall be forfeited and cease to remain owing by the Company.  Finally, the Amended Bye-laws provide that no unpaid dividend will bear interest as against the Company.  The Board believes these changes provide greater administrative clarity and efficiency and reflect good corporate practice.  (Bye-law 15 and Bye-law 17 of the Amended Bye-laws)

·Electronic Delivery of Proxy and Other Materials.  As permitted by the legislative amendments to the Companies Act, the Amended Bye-laws allow us to deliver information and documents to the shareholder by posting them on a website and sending a notice to the shareholder of the availability of such information and documents on the website. This conforms with the voluntary proxy notice and access rules enacted by the SEC and will allow us, in our discretion, to offer that delivery method to our shareholders in the future.  (Bye-law 23 of the Amended Bye-laws)

·Adjournment of General Meetings.  Currently, the Bye-laws provide that a general meeting may be adjourned by the chairman of the meeting with the consent of shareholders holding a majority of the voting rights of shareholders present in person or by proxy.  The Amended Bye-laws add a provision to allow the chairman of a general meeting to adjourn the meeting to another time without the consent or direction of the shareholders if it is likely to be impractical to hold or continue the meeting because of the number of shareholders who are not present, the unruly conduct of persons attending the meeting prevents, or is likely to prevent, the orderly continuation of the business of the meeting, or an adjournment is otherwise necessary so that the business of the meeting may be properly conducted.  The changes permit the Board greater flexibility in establishing the procedures and restrictions in connection with the orderly administration of general meetings.  (Bye-law 33 of the Amended Bye-laws)

·Alternate Directors.  Bermuda law and the current Bye-laws provide that the shareholders in general meeting may either elect alternate directors who have the right to attend Board meetings and vote in the absence of the appointing director or authorize the Board to appoint such alternate directors.  The Amended Bye-laws omit this provision because it is not consistent with current public company practice in the US.  In the Board’s view, only an individual elected by the shareholders to serve as a director or appointed by the Board to fill a vacancy on the Board should be entitled to act as a director.  (Current Bye-law 14; deleted in Amended Bye-laws)

·Officer Positions.  The Bye-laws currently require the appointment of a President and a Vice President, Chairman, Deputy Chairman and Secretary as officers of the Company. As a result of the legislative amendments to the Companies Act, there are no longer any specific titles required for officers except “Secretary.” Thus, the Amended Bye-laws provide that the only required Company officer is the Secretary and the Board is otherwise permitted to appoint officers in its discretion.  (Bye-law 46 of the Amended Bye-laws)

·Conflicts of Interest.  The Bye-laws currently provide that an Interested Director (as defined in the Amended Bye-laws) who has complied with the requirements in the Bye-laws in declaring the nature of his interest in a contract or proposed contract may vote on such contract or proposed contract and be counted in the quorum for the meeting.  The Amended Bye-laws add a provision to clarify further, consistent with the current industry standard, that no such contract or proposed contract shall be void or voidable by reason only that the Interested Director voted on it or was counted in the quorum of the relevant meeting and that the Interested Director shall not be liable to account to the Company for any profit realized thereby.  (Bye-law 50 of the Amended Bye-laws)

·Director and Officer Indemnification and Exculpation.  The Amended Bye-laws updated the provisions regarding indemnification and exculpation of directors and officers of the Company to provide that we may in our discretion maintain insurance against liability incurred by directors and officers acting in those capacities, and may advance defense costs subject to repayment if any allegation of fraud or dishonesty is proved. The Amended Bye-laws also clarify that the indemnification and exculpation provisions apply whether the director or officer was acting in relation to the affairs of the Company or any of

its subsidiaries. In addition, the Amended Bye-laws clarify that the parties indemnified under the indemnification and exculpation provisions expressly include the current and former directors, secretary, or other officers, resident representative, any person appointed to any committee by the Board, and the liquidator or trustees of the Company acting in relation to any of the affairs of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. Finally, the Bye-laws currently provide that indemnity shall not extend to any matter in respect of any willful negligence, willful default, fraud or dishonesty of the indemnified parties.  Consistent with legislative changes to the Companies Act, the Amended Bye-laws remove the exclusion to indemnity for willful negligence and willful default.  (Bye-law 51 of the Amended Bye-laws)

·Corporate Seal.  The legislative amendments to the Companies Act conforms Bermuda law to modern practice by eliminating the requirement that share certificates, deeds and other documents be executed under seal. The Amended Bye-laws reflect that change.  (Bye-law 62 of the Amended Bye-laws)

·Retention of Records of Account.  The Amended Bye-laws add a provision requiring the records of account of the Company to be retained for a minimum period of five years from the date on which they were prepared.  This change is in accordance with good corporate governance practices and reflect the current Bermuda law requirement under the Companies Act.  (Bye-law 63 of the Amended Bye-laws)

·Appointment and Remuneration of Auditor.  Currently, the Bye-laws provide that if the office of the auditor become vacant by the resignation, disability or death of the Auditor, the Board shall convene a special general meeting to fill the vacancy.  The Amended Bye-laws enhance the Board’s flexibility and efficiency by adding provisions to allow the Board to fill any casual vacancy in the office of the auditor and to fix the remuneration of an auditor appointed by the Board to fill a casual vacancy.  Except as described above, the appointment and remuneration of the auditor must be approved by the shareholders of the Company.  (Bye-laws 66, 67, 70 and 72 of the Amended Bye-laws)

The foregoing is a summary of some of the changes provided for by Proposal 3H and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Amended Bye-laws set forth in Appendix A. Shareholders are urged to carefully review Appendix A.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL 3H: OTHER CHANGES TO THE BYE-LAWS.

PROPOSAL 3I — BOARD AUTHORISATION

Both the existing Bye-laws and the Amended Bye-laws provide that the Board has the power to carry out certain actions.  Shareholders are being asked in this Proposal 3I to specifically authorise the Board to carry out the powers given to the Board in the Amended Bye-laws.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL 3I: BOARD AUTHORISATION

Vote Required for Approval and Recommendation

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to approve the Amended Bye-laws as described in each of the nine proposals above (Proposals 3A through 3I).

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED BYE-LAWS BY A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF EACH OF PROPOSALS 3A THROUGH 3I.

PROPOSAL 4: APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE HELEN OF TROY LIMITED AMENDED AND RESTATED 2011 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN

 

We are submitting to our shareholders this proposal to approve an amendment to the Helen of Troy Limited Amended and Restated 2011 Annual Incentive Plan (the “Restated Plan”“Amendment”) and the terms of the performance goals established thereunder..  The Restated PlanAmendment amends and restates the Helen of Troy Limited Amended and Restated 2011 Annual Incentive Plan (the “2011 Bonus Plan”), which includes to increase the following modifications:

·to eliminatelimit on the separate provisions for bonus compensation to Gerald J. Rubin, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, in connection with his resignation and departure from the Company, including the CEO Annualaggregate Incentive Bonus CEO Insurance Bonus, and related specific performance measures relating to Mr. Rubin’s compensationreceived by any Participant under the 2011 Bonus Plan (as defined therein);

·in any performance period to amend the performance criteria under$4,500,000 from $3,000,000.  No other amendments are being made to the 2011 Bonus Plan; andPlan.

 

·to clarify certain other matters and make conforming changes.

The text of the Restated Plan is attached hereto as Appendix A.  The material features of the Restated2011 Bonus Plan are discussed below, but the description is subject to, and is qualified in its entirety by, the full text of the Restated2011 Bonus Plan.  If the Restated PlanAmendment is not approved by our shareholders at the Annual Meeting, then the Restated AgreementAmendment will not become effective and the 2011 Bonus Plan will continue in full force and effect. In addition, if the Amendment is not approved by our shareholders, the Incentive Bonus award granted to our Chief Executive Officer, Julien R. Mininberg, for the annual performance period commencing March 1, 2016 will be subject to the maximum payment limits set forth in the 2011 Bonus Plan. Such award is more fully described under “New Plan Benefits” below.

 

General

 

The purpose of the Restated2011 Bonus Plan is to promote the success of the Company and its subsidiaries by providing to the Participantscertain key employees (including officers) of the Company and its subsidiaries bonus incentives that qualify as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. The Restated2011 Bonus Plan is designed to recognize the significant contributions of the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ executive officers to the growth, profitability and success of the Company and its subsidiaries by rewarding participating executive officers for the achievement of pre-established annual performance goals.

 

Eligibility and Incentive Bonuses

 

The Restated2011 Bonus Plan authorizes the Compensation Committee to establish and administer performance criteria pursuant to which eligible executiveskey employees and consultants may receive designated bonus compensation (the “Incentive Bonus”). Key employees (including any officer) and consultants of the Company or its subsidiaries that are selected by the Compensation Committee are eligible to participate in the Restated2011 Bonus Plan. The Compensation Committee in its sole discretion determines key employees and consultants eligible for Incentive Bonus awards (the “Participants”) and, subject to the terms of the 2011 Bonus Plan, the amount of such Incentive Bonuses payable to such Participants.  The number of key employees and consultants, if any, that are eligible to receive awards under the 2011 Bonus Plan as of February 29, 2016 is not determinable.

New Plan Benefits

Except as described in the table below, we have not approved any Incentive Bonus awards where any of the terms are conditioned upon shareholder approval of the Amendment to the 2011 Bonus Plan.  If the Amendment is not approved, then the maximum amount of Mr. Mininberg’s annual incentive bonus will be subject to the $3,000,000 participant limit under the 2011 Bonus Plan.  However, there are some Incentive Bonus awards outstanding under the 2011 Bonus Plan that are not subject to shareholder approval of the Amendment.  Future grants under the Amendment to the 2011 Bonus Plan will be determined by the Compensation Committee, in its discretion, as described above. Thus, except as set forth in the table below, the Company cannot, at this time, determine the amount of any Incentive Bonuses that may be paid underin the Restated Plan.  Prior to fiscal year 2014, the only Participant infuture under the 2011 Bonus Plan has been the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, Gerald J. Rubin.  The compensation committee in its sole discretion determines executives eligible for Incentive Bonus awards (the “Participants”) and, subject to the terms of the Restated Plan, the amount of such Incentive Bonuses payable to such participants.Plan.

Helen of Troy Limited

Amended and Restated 2011 Annual Incentive Plan

Name and Position

Maximum Dollar Value ($)

Julien R. Mininberg, Chief Executive Officer

$3,050,000

Brian L. Grass, Chief Financial Officer

-

Thomas J. Benson, Chief Operations Officer

-

Vincent D. Carson, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

-

Executive Group

$3,050,000

Non-Executive Director Group

-

Non-Executive Officer Employee Group

-

 

Administration

 

The Restated2011 Bonus Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee, which consists of two or more “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. The Compensation Committee has the authority to construe and interpret the Restated2011 Bonus Plan and may adopt rules and regulations governing the administration thereof.

NoUnder the current provisions of the 2011 Bonus Plan, no Participant shall receive an Incentive Bonus under the Restated2011 Bonus Plan for any performance period in excess of $3,000,000. If the Amendment is approved by shareholders, the limit will be increased to $4,500,000.  In addition, no Participant shall receive any payment under the Restated2011 Bonus Plan unless the Compensation Committee has certified, by resolution or other appropriate action in writing, that the amount thereof has been accurately determined in accordance with the terms, conditions and limits of the Restated2011 Bonus Plan and that the performance criteria and any other material terms previously established by the Compensation Committee or set forth in the Restated2011 Bonus Plan were in fact satisfied.

 

Any Incentive Bonus granted by the Compensation Committee under the Restated2011 Bonus Plan shall be paid in cash or shares of Common Stock and shall be paid as soon as practicable following the end of the applicable performance period and no later than the fifteenth day of the third calendar month following the end of the performance period (which generally shall be the Company’s fiscal year), unless the Participant with the consent of the Compensation Committee, elects, prior to the beginning of the applicable performance period, to defer all or a portion such payment.  Incentive Bonuses paid in shares of Common

57



Table of Contents

Stock will be paid under the 2008 Stock Plan (or any successor plan) and shall reduce the number of shares available for issuance under the plan.

 

Except as otherwise provided in a written agreement between the Company and the Participant, no Incentive Bonus will be paid for any fiscal year unless the Participant is an employee of the Company at the end of that fiscal year, except if the Participant’s employment terminates during a fiscal year by reason of death, disability or a Change in Control (as defined in the Restated2011 Bonus Plan), then the Participant (or the Participant’s beneficiary) will receive the Incentive Bonus for that fiscal year, prorated to the date of termination of employment.

 

Performance TargetsGoals

 

Performance goals established under the Restated2011 Bonus Plan for each of the Participants may be, but need not be, different for each fiscal year, and different performance goals may be applicable to different Participants. The specific performance criteriagoals must be established by the Compensation Committee in advance of the deadlines applicable under Section 162(m) of the Code and while the performanceattainment relating to the performance criteriagoals remains substantially uncertain within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. Each Participant may receive an Incentive Bonus if and only if the performance criteriagoals established by the Compensation Committee is attained. The performance measuresgoals to be used for purposes of awards to employees whose compensation is subject to Section 162(m) of the Code must be chosen by the Compensation Committee from among the following:

 

·                  earnings before or after taxes

·                  earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization

·                  net income

·                  operating income

·                  earnings from continuing operations

·                  earnings per share (whether basic or fully diluted)

·                  book value per share

·                  return measures (including, but not limited to, return on assets, capital, invested capital, equity, sales or revenue)

·                  expense management

·                  return on investment before or after the cost of capital

·                  improvements in capital structure

·                  maintenance or improvement of profit margins

·                  stock price

·                  market share

·                  revenues or sales

·                  costs

·                  cash flow

·                  cash flow productivity

·                  working capital

·                  changes in net assets (whether or not multiplied by a constant percentage intended to represent the cost of capital)

·                  debt reduction

·                  reductions in the Company’s overhead ratio

·                  growth measures (including, but not limited to, sales, net income, cash flow or earnings per share)

·                  total shareholder return

·                  free cash flow

·                  expense to sales ratio

Any of the above criteria may relate to or be based upon the Company, one or more of its Subsidiaries, divisions, geography, business units, segments, products, product lines, partnerships, joint ventures, minority investments (except with respect to total shareholder return and earnings per share criteria), or any combination thereof, or may be determined or applied on an absolute or relative basis, a consolidated basis, an adjusted basis, or as compared to the performance of a published or special index or a group of comparable companies, or any combination thereof.  Such criteria are not required to be based an increase or positive result and could include, for example, maintaining the status quo or limiting economic losses.

 

58



Table of Contents

Amendments to the Restated2011 Bonus Plan

 

The Restated2011 Bonus Plan including the performance goals stated therein, can be amended by the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee alone, unless such amendment is required to be approved by the Board of Directors or the Company’s shareholders to comply with the applicable rules under Section 162(m) of the Code.

 

Transferability

 

Except as expressly provided by the Committee, benefits payable under the Restated2011 Bonus Plan are not transferable otherwise than by an assignment of a contingency or payment due after death of the Participant to the deceased Participant’s legal representative or beneficiary.

 

Federal Income Tax Consequences

 

The following is a discussion of certain U.S. corporate and personal federal income tax consequences relevant to the Company and its participants in the Restated2011 Bonus Plan. It is not intended to be a complete description of all possible tax consequences with respect to awards granted under the Restated2011 Bonus Plan and does not address state, local or foreign tax consequences.

 

To the extent that an Incentive Bonus is paid in shares of common stock, generally, a participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of payment over the amount, if any, the participant paid for the shares. With respect to the issuance of shares of common stock, the Company will be entitled to a tax deduction at the same time and in the same amount as the participant recognizes income.  If such shares are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture when issued, the participant’s recognition of income and the Company’s deduction shall be delayed until the substantial risk of forfeiture lapses.

 

The Compensation Committee will require payment of any amount it may determine to be necessary to withhold for federal, state, local or other taxes as a result of the issuance of shares of common stock.

 

Section 162(m) of the Code.  Section 162(m) of the Code generally disallows a federal income tax deduction to any publicly held corporation for compensation paid by the Company in excess of $1,000,000 in any taxable year to any “covered employee” as of the last day of the taxable year, but exempts from this limitation “performance-based” compensation the material terms of which are disclosed and approved by shareholders. For purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code, “covered employees” include the chief executive officer or anyand each of the fourthree other most highly compensated named executive officers other than the chief financial officer.  The Company has structured and intends to implement the Restated2011 Bonus Plan so that compensation paid to these executive officers under the Restated2011 Bonus Plan would be qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code and would not, therefore, be subject to any deduction limitation under Section 162(m) of the Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company may, from time to time, award compensation to executive officers that is not deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code.

 

Section 280G of the Code.  Under certain circumstances, payments, including Incentive Bonus payments, made in connection with a Change in Control (as defined in the Restated2011 Bonus Plan) of the Company might be deemed an “excess parachute payment” for purposes of the golden parachute tax provisions of Section 280G of the Code. To the extent it is so considered, the recipient may be subject to a 20 percent excise tax, and the Company may be denied a tax deduction.

 

Sections 409A and 457A of the Code.  The Company generally intends that, to the extent applicable, awards granted under the Restated2011 Bonus Plan will comply with, or be exempt from, the provisions of SectionsSection 409A of the Code and will be exempt from Section 457A of the Code. Restricted stock is not subject to Section 409A of the Code. Other awards have been designed to be exempt from Sections 409A and 457A because the awards are settled immediately following the vesting date, or to automatically comply with SectionsSection 409A and 457A of the Code. However, recipients of performance-based awards may be permitted to elect to defer the payment of certain performance-based awards.awards to the extent that the recipient would not be subject to Section 457A of the Code. This deferral election and the subsequent payment of the awards are also intended to comply with SectionsSection 409A and 457A of the Code. However, under certain circumstances the accelerated payment of Incentive Bonuses subject to SectionsSection 409A and 457A of the Code that violates Section 409A may subject the recipient to adverse tax consequences, including penalty taxes and interest.

59



Table of Contents

Tax Summary.  The foregoing discussion is intended only as a summary of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences and does not purport to be a complete discussion of all the tax consequences of participation in the Restated2011 Bonus Plan. Accordingly, participants in the Restated2011 Bonus Plan should consult their own tax advisers for specific advice with respect to all U.S. federal, state or local tax effects of participating in the Restated2011 Bonus Plan. Moreover, the Company does not represent that the foregoing tax consequences apply to any particular participant’s specific circumstances or will continue to apply in the future and makes no undertaking to maintain the tax status of the Restated2011 Bonus Plan with respect to any participant.

 

The Restated2011 Bonus Plan is not subject to any provision of ERISA, nor is it a qualified employee benefit plan under Section 401(a) of the Code.

 

Other

The Company cannot, at this time, determine the amount of any Incentive Bonuses that may be paid under the Restated Plan.  Prior to fiscal year 2014, the only Participant in the 2011 Bonus Plan has been the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, Gerald J. Rubin. Because the Participants under the Restated Plan are to be determined from time to time by the Compensation Committee, in its discretion, it is impossible at this time to determine the classes of persons who will be eligible to participate in the Restated Plan or the number of persons in each such class.

Clawback Policy

 

Any participant receiving any Incentive Bonus pursuant to the Restated2011 Bonus Plan shall be subject to (1) Section 304 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 and (2) to the extent required under the rules and/or regulations issued pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, any clawback policy adopted by the Company pursuant to such rules and/or regulations.

 

Vote Required for Approval and Recommendation

 

The affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to approve the Helen of Troy Limited Amended and Restated 2011 Annual Incentive Plan. An affirmative vote by a shareholder shall also be deemedAmendment to be approval of the performance goals under the Helen of Troy Limited Amended and Restated 2011 Annual Incentive Plan for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code.Plan.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL.

 

PROPOSAL 4:5: APPOINTMENT OF AUDITOR AND INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM AND AUTHORIZATION OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO SET

THE AUDITOR’S REMUNERATION

 

Under Bermuda law, our shareholders have the responsibility to appoint the auditor and independent registered public accounting firm of the Company to hold office until the close of the next annual general meeting and are able to authorize the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to set the auditors’ remuneration.

 

The Audit Committee has nominated Grant Thornton LLP as the Company’s auditor and independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2015.2017. A representative of Grant Thornton LLP, the Company’s auditor and independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2014,2016, is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting with the opportunity to make a statement if the representative desires to do so. The Grant Thornton LLP representative is also expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

 

Vote Required for Approval and Recommendation

 

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to appoint Grant Thornton LLP as our auditor and independent registered public accounting firm and authorize the Audit Committee to set the auditor’s remuneration as described in this Proposal 4.5.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL.

60



Table of Contents

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

 

Shareholders intending to present proposals at the 20152017 annual general meeting of shareholders and desiring to have those proposals included in the Company’s proxy statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting must submit such proposals, in compliance with Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, to be received at the executive offices of the Company no later than March 16, 2015.17, 2017. For proposals that shareholders intend to present at the 20152017 annual general meeting of shareholders outside the processes of Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, unless the shareholder notifies the Company of such intent by May 30, 2015,31, 2017, any proxy solicited by the Company for that annual general meeting will confer on the holder of the proxy discretionary authority to vote on the proposal so long as such proposal is properly presented at the meeting.

 

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

 

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s Directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10 percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Common Stock and other equity securities of the Company. Directors, executive officers and greater than 10 percent shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

 

To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no other reports were required, during fiscal year 2014,2016, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to the Directors, executive officers and greater than 10 percent shareholders were satisfied.satisfied, except for that (i) Mr. Grass filed two late Form 4s with respect to an open market sale and an exempt transaction; (ii) Mr. Butterworth filed two late Form 4s with respect to exempt transactions; (iii) Mr. Carson filed one late Form 4 with respect to an exempt transaction; (iv) Mr. Benson filed one late Form 4 with respect to an exempt transaction; (v) Mr. Oppenheim filed one late Form 4 with respect to an exempt transaction; (vi) Ms. Raff filed two late Form 4s with respect to exempt transactions; and (vii) Mr. Meeker filed one late Form 4 with respect to an exempt transaction.

 

OTHER MATTERS

 

Except as described in this proxy statement, the Board of Directors knows of no other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If other matters that require the vote of the shareholders, including a question of adjourning the Annual Meeting, properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof, the holders of the proxies are authorized to vote on these matters in accordance with management’s discretion. The accompanying proxy card confers discretionary authority to take action with respect to any additional matters that may come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

 

HOUSEHOLDING OF MATERIALS

 

Some banks, brokers, and other nominee record holders may be participating in the practice of “householding” proxy statements and annual reports. This means that only one copy of the Company’s proxy statement or annual report may have been sent to multiple shareholders in the same household. The Company will promptly deliver a separate copy of either document to any shareholder upon request by contacting Helen of Troy Investor Relations, ICR, Inc.: Allison Malkin (203) 682-8200 or Anne Rakunas (310) 954-1113,Eunice Han (646) 277-1220, or via e-mail at hotus@icrinc.com,HOTUS@ICRINC.COM, or send written correspondence to Helen of Troy Limited, Attention: Investor Relations, 1 Helen of Troy Plaza, El Paso, Texas 79912. Any shareholder who wants to receive separate copies of the annual report and proxy statement in the future, or who is currently receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy for his or her household, should contact his or her bank, broker, or other nominee record holder, or contact the Company at the above address and phone number.

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

 

This proxy statement and the Company’s 20142016 Annual Report to Shareholders are also available electronically on our hosted website. You may view these directly at: HTTP://MATERIALS.PROXYVOTE.COM/G4388N. To access and review the materials made available electronically:

 

1.   Go to HTTP://MATERIALS.PROXYVOTE.COM/G4388N.

 

2.   Click the “2014“2016 Annual Report” or “2014“2016 Notice of Proxy”.

 

We encourage you to review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting.

61



Table of Contents

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS

 

If you received your Annual Meeting materials by mail, we encourage you to conserve natural resources, as well as significantly reduce the Company’s printing and mailing costs, by signing up to receive shareholder communications via e-mail. With electronic delivery, you will be notified via e-mail after the annual report and the proxy statement are available on the Internet, and you can submit your proxy appointment and instructions online. Electronic delivery can also help reduce the number of bulky documents in your personal files and eliminate duplicate mailings. To sign up for electronic delivery:

 

1.              If you are a registered holder (you hold your shares of Common Stock in your own name through our transfer agent, Computershare Investor Services, LLC, or you have stock certificates), you can elect to have next year’s communications sent to you electronically as part of this year’s on-line proxy appointment and instruction process at WWW.PROXYVOTE.COM by following the instructions that will be provided to you on screen when you submit your proxy.

 

2.              If you are a beneficial holder (your shares are held by a brokerage firm, a bank or a trustee), you may contact your broker or visit their website. Most brokers have made provisions for you to sign up on-line for electronic delivery of shareholder reports and mailings.

 

Your electronic delivery enrollment will be effective until you cancel it.

 

HOW TO OBTAIN OUR ANNUAL REPORT, PROXY STATEMENT

AND OTHER INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMPANY

 

From time to time, we receive calls from shareholders asking how they can obtain more information regarding the Company.  The following options are available:

 

1.              Our Investor Relations site, which can be accessed from our main Internet website located at www.hotus.com,WWW.HOTUS.COM, contains Company press releases, earnings releases, financial information and stock quotes, as well as corporate governance information and links to our SEC filings. This proxy statement and our 20142016 Annual Report to Shareholders are both available at this site.

 

2.You may also request a free copy of our Annual Report or proxy statement by contacting Helen of Troy Investor Relations, ICR, Inc.: Allison Malkin (203) 682-8200 or Anne Rakunas (310) 954-1113,Eunice Han (646) 277-1220, or via e-mail at hotus@icrinc.com,HOTUS@ICRINC.COM, or send written correspondence to Helen of Troy Limited, Attention: Investor Relations, 1 Helen of Troy Plaza, El Paso, Texas 79912.

 

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

APPENDIX A

 

62AMENDED AND RESTATED BYE-LAWS

OF

HELEN OF TROY LIMITED

(as adopted at the Annual General Meeting held on 17 August, 2016)



Table of Contents

 

Exhibit ATable of Contents

INTERPRETATION

1

1.

Definitions

1

SHARES

3

2.

Power to Issue Shares

3

3.

Power of the Company to Purchase its Shares

3

4.

Rights Attaching to Shares

3

5.

Calls on Shares

4

6.

Forfeiture of Shares

5

7.

Share Certificates

6

8.

Fractional Shares

7

REGISTRATION OF SHARES

7

9.

Register of Members

7

10.

Registered Holder Absolute Owner

7

11.

Transfer of Registered Shares

7

12.

Transmission of Registered Shares

9

ALTERATION OF SHARE CAPITAL

11

13.

Power to Alter Capital

11

14.

Variation of Rights Attaching to Shares

11

DIVIDENDS AND CAPITALISATION

11

15.

Dividends

11

16.

Power to Set Aside Profits

12

17.

Method of Payment

12

18.

Capitalisation

12

MEETINGS OF MEMBERS

13

19.

Annual General Meetings

13

20.

Special General Meetings

13

21.

Requisitioned General Meetings and Member Proposals

13

22.

Notice

16

23.

Giving Notice and Access

18

24.

Postponement or Cancellation of General Meeting

18

25.

Electronic Participation and Security in Meetings

18

26.

Quorum at General Meetings

19

27.

Chairman to Preside at General Meetings

19

28.

Voting on Resolutions

19

29.

Power to Demand a Vote on a Poll

20

30.

Voting by Joint Holders of Shares

21

31.

Instrument of Proxy

22

32.

Representation of Corporate Member

22

33.

Adjournment of General Meeting

23

34.

Written Resolutions

23

35.

Directors Attendance at General Meetings

24

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

24

36.

Election of Directors

24

37.

Number of Directors

28

38.

Eligibility as a Director

28

39.

Removal of Directors

29

40.

Vacancy in the Office of Director

29

41.

Remuneration of Directors

30

 



HELEN OF TROY LIMITED

AMENDED AND RESTATED

2011 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN

Section 1.PURPOSE OF PLAN

The purposeTable of the Plan is to promote the success of the Company and its Subsidiaries by providing to the participating executives of the Company and its Subsidiaries bonus incentives that qualify as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code.  Subject to the approval of the shareholders of the Company, the Plan shall be effective as of March 1, 2014.

Section 2.DEFINITIONS AND TERMS

2.1.Accounting Terms.  Except as otherwise expressly provided or the context otherwise requires, financial and accounting terms are used as defined for purposes of, and shall be determined in accordance with, GAAP.Contents

 

2.2.Specific Terms.  The following words and phrases as used herein shall have the following meanings:

42.

Defect in Appointment

30

43.

Directors to Manage Business

30

44.

Powers of the Board of Directors

31

45.

Register of Directors and Officers

32

46.

Appointment of Officers

32

47.

Appointment of Secretary

32

48.

Duties of Officers

32

49.

Remuneration of Officers

32

50.

Conflicts of Interest

32

51.

Indemnification and Exculpation of Directors and Officers

33

MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

34

52.

Board Meetings

34

53.

Notice of Board Meetings

34

54.

Electronic Participation in Meetings

34

55.

Quorum at Board Meetings

34

56.

Board to Continue in the Event of Vacancy

34

57.

Chairman to Preside

34

58.

Written Resolutions

35

59.

Validity of Prior Acts of the Board

35

CORPORATE RECORDS

35

60.

Minutes

35

61.

Place Where Corporate Records Kept

35

62.

Form and Use of Seal

35

ACCOUNTS

36

63.

Records of Account

36

64.

Financial Year End

36

AUDITS

36

65.

Annual Audit

36

66.

Appointment of Auditor

36

67.

Remuneration of Auditor

36

68.

Duties of Auditor

36

69.

Access to Records

37

70.

Financial Statements and the Auditor’s Report

37

71.

Vacancy in the Office of Auditor

37

VOLUNTARY WINDING-UP AND DISSOLUTION

38

72.

Winding-Up

38

CHANGES TO CONSTITUTION

38

73.

Changes to Bye-laws

38

74.

Discontinuance

38

 

Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

Bonus” means a cash or cash equivalent payment, payment in Shares, or payment opportunity as a context requires.

Business Criteria” means any performance goals established by the Committee with respect to or based upon one or more (or any combination) of the following criteria selected by the Committee: (1) earnings before or after taxes; (2) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; (3) net income; (4) operating income; (5) earnings from continuing operations; (6) earnings per share (whether basic or fully diluted); (7) book value per share; (8) return measures (including, but not limited to, return on assets, capital, invested capital, equity, sales or revenue); (9) expense management; (10) return on investment before or after the cost of capital; (11) improvements in capital structure; (12) maintenance or improvement of profit margins; (13) stock price; (14) market share; (15) revenues or sales; (16) costs; (17) cash flow; (18) cash flow productivity; (19) working capital; (20) changes in net assets (whether or not multiplied by a constant percentage intended to represent the cost of capital); (21) debt reduction; (22) reductions in the Company’s overhead ratio; (23) growth measures (including, but not limited to, sales, net income, cash flow or earnings per share); (24) total shareholder return; (25) free cash flow; and (26) expenses to sales ratio.  Any of the above criteria may relate to or be based upon the Company, one or more of its Subsidiaries, divisions, geography, business units, segments, products, product lines, partnerships, joint ventures, minority investments (except with respect to total shareholder return and earnings per share criteria), or any combination thereof, or may be determined or applied on an absolute or relative basis, a consolidated basis, an adjusted basis, or as compared to the performance of a published or special index, including, but not limited to, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index, the Nasdaq Market index, the Russell 2000 index or a group of comparable companies, or any combination thereof.   Business Criteria need not, however, be based upon any increase or positive result under a business criterion and could include, for example, maintaining the status quo or limiting economic losses.

Change in Control” shall mean to have occurred at such time as either (i) any “person”, as such term is used in section 14(d) of the Exchange Act, other than the Company, a wholly-owned Subsidiary of the Company or any employee benefit plan of the Company, or its Subsidiaries, is or becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act (or any successor rule), directly or indirectly, of fifty percent (50%) or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s common stock, or (ii) individuals who

A-1



Table of Contents

 

constitute the Board on the effective date of this Plan (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof, provided that any person becoming a director subsequent to the date hereof whose election or nomination for election by the Company’s shareholders was approved by a vote of at least three quarters of the directors comprising the Incumbent Board (either by a specific vote or by approval of the proxy statement of the Company in which such person is named as a nominee for the director without objection to such nomination) shall be, for purposes of this clause (ii) considered as though such person was a member of the Incumbent Board.INTERPRETATION

Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Company which has been established to administer the Plan in accordance with Section 3.1 and Section 162(m) of the Code.

Company” means Helen of Troy Limited, a Bermuda company, and any successor whether by merger, amalgamation, ownership or all or substantially all of its assets or otherwise.

Disability” shall have such meaning attributed thereto in the Company’s long-term disability plan, or, if no such plan exists, shall mean a “Permanent and Total Disability” as defined in Code Section 22(e).

 “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and as interpreted by the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

Executive” means a key employee (including any officer) of the Company or any of the Subsidiaries.

Fair Market Value” means, as of any date that requires the determination of the Fair Market Value of Shares under this Plan, the value of a Share on such date of determination, calculated as follows:

(i) If the Shares are then listed or admitted to trading on a Nasdaq market system or a stock exchange which reports closing sale prices, the Fair Market Value shall be the closing sale price on such date on such Nasdaq market system or principal stock exchange on which the Share is then listed or admitted to trading, or, if no closing sale price is quoted on such day, then the Fair Market Value shall be the closing sale price of the Share on such Nasdaq market system or such exchange on the immediately preceding day on which a closing sale price is reported;

(ii) If the Shares are not then listed or admitted to trading on a Nasdaq market system or a stock exchange which reports closing sale prices, the Fair Market Value shall be the average of the closing bid and asked prices of the Share in the over-the-counter market on such date; or

(iii) If neither clause (i) nor (ii) is applicable as of such date, then the Fair Market Value shall be determined by the Board in good faith using any reasonable method of evaluation, which determination shall be conclusive and binding on all interested parties.

GAAP” means generally accepted accounting principles used and applied in the United States of America.

Participant” means an Executive selected to participate in the Plan by the Committee.

Performance Period” means the Year or Years (or any portion thereof) with respect to which the Performance Targets are set by the Committee.

Performance Target(s)” means the specific objective goal or goals (which may be cumulative and/or alternative) that are timely set in writing by the Committee for each Executive for the Performance Period with respect to any one or more of the Business Criteria.

Plan” means the Helen of Troy Limited Amended and Restated 2011 Annual Incentive Plan as amended from time to time.

A-2



Table of Contents

Section 162(m)” means Section 162(m) of the Code, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, all as amended from time to time.

Shares” means common shares, par value $0.10 per share, of the Company.

Stock Plan” means the Helen of Troy Limited 2008 Stock Incentive Plan, as it may be amended, restated or otherwise modified from time to time, and any successor or replacement plan adopted by the Board.

Subsidiary” means any corporation, partnership or other entity as to which more than fifty percent (50%) of the voting securities or other voting ownership interests shall now or hereafter be owned or controlled, directly by a person, any Subsidiary of such person, or any Subsidiary of such Subsidiary.

Year” means any one or more fiscal years of the Company commencing on March 1 of each year that represent(s) an applicable Performance Period.

 

Section 3.1.DefinitionsADMINISTRATION OF THE PLAN

3.1.The Committee.  The Plan shall be administered by a Committee consisting solely of at least two members of the Board, duly authorized by the Board to administer the Plan, who (i) are not eligible to participate in the Plan and (ii) are “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m).

3.2.Powers of the Committee.  The Committee shall have the sole authority to establish and administer the Performance Target(s) and the responsibility of determining from among the Executives those persons who will participate in and receive Bonuses under the Plan and, subject to Sections 4 and 5 of the Plan, the amount of such Bonuses and shall otherwise be responsible for the administration of the Plan, in accordance with its terms.  The Committee shall have the authority to construe and interpret the Plan and any agreement or other document relating to any Bonus under the Plan, may adopt rules and regulations governing the administration of the Plan, and shall exercise all other duties and powers conferred on it by the Plan, or which are incidental or ancillary thereto. As provided in Section 4.3, for each Performance Period, the Committee shall determine, at the time the Business Criteria and the Performance Target(s) are set, those Executives who are selected as Participants in the Plan.

3.3.Requisite Action.  A majority (but not fewer than two) of the members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum.  The vote of a majority of those present at a meeting at which a quorum is present or the unanimous written consent of the Committee shall constitute action by the Committee.

3.4.Express Authority (and Limitations on Authority) to Change Terms and Conditions of Bonus.  Without limiting the Committee’s authority under other provisions of the Plan, but subject to any express limitations of the Plan and Section 5.8, the Committee shall have the authority to accelerate a Bonus (after the attainment of the applicable Performance Target(s) and certification by the Committee in accordance with Section 4.8) and to waive restrictive conditions for a Bonus (including any forfeiture conditions, but not Performance Target(s)), in such circumstances as the Committee deems appropriate.  In the case of any acceleration of a Bonus after the attainment of the applicable Performance Target(s) and certification by the Committee in accordance with Section 4.8, the amount payable may be discounted, in the Committee’s discretion, to its present value using an interest rate equal to the published prime rate charged by Bank of America, N.A. or any successor thereof (such rate to be determined as of the last business day of the month preceding the month in which such acceleration occurs).

 

Section 4.1.1BONUS PROVISIONSIn these Bye-laws, the following words and expressions shall, where not inconsistent with the context, have the following meanings, respectively:

Act

the Companies Act 1981;

Auditor

includes an individual, company or partnership;

Board

the board of directors (including, for the avoidance of doubt, a sole director) appointed or elected pursuant to these Bye-laws and acting by resolution in accordance with the Act and these Bye-laws or the directors present at a meeting of directors at which there is a quorum;

Company

the company for which these Bye-laws are approved and confirmed;

Director

a director of the Company;

Exchange Act Member

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; the person registered in the Register of Members as the holder of shares in the Company and, when two or more persons are so registered as joint holders of shares, means the person whose name stands first in the Register of Members as one of such joint holders or all of such persons, as the context so requires;

notice

written notice as further provided in these Bye-laws unless otherwise specifically stated;

Officer

any person appointed by the Board to hold an office in the Company;

principal executive offices

the registered office of the Company in Bermuda and the U.S. office where the Secretary of the Company is situate from time to time;

Register of Directors and Officers

the register of directors and officers referred to in these Bye-laws;

 

4.1.A-Provision for Bonus.  Each Participant may receive a Bonus if and only if the Performance Target(s) established by the Committee, relative to the applicable Business Criteria, are attained.  The applicable Performance Period and Performance Target(s) shall be determined by the Committee consistent with the terms of the Plan and Section 162(m).

A-31



Table of Contents

4.2.Selection of Performance Target(s) for Participants – Business Criteria.  With respect to any Bonus that a Participant may receive under the Plan, the specific Performance Target(s) with respect to the Business Criteria must be established by the Committee in advance of the deadlines applicable under Section 162(m) and while the performance relating to the Performance Target(s) remains substantially uncertain within the meaning of Section 162(m).  At the time the Performance Target(s) are selected, the Committee shall provide, in terms of an objective formula or standard for each such Participant, and for any person who may become a Participant after the Performance Target(s) are set, the method of computing the specific amount that will represent the maximum amount of Bonus payable to such Participant if the Performance Target(s) are attained, subject to Sections 4.1, 4.7, 4.10, 5.1 and 5.8.

4.3.Selection of Participants. For each Performance Period, the Committee shall determine, at the time the Business Criteria and the Performance Target(s) are set, the Executives who will participate in the Plan.

4.4.Effect of Mid-Year Commencement of Service.  To the extent compatible with Sections 4.2 and 5.8, if services as an Executive commence after the adoption of the Plan and the Performance Target(s) are established for a Performance Period, the Committee may grant a Bonus that is proportionately adjusted based on the period of actual service during the Year; the amount of any Bonus paid to such person shall not exceed that proportionate amount.

4.5.Termination of Employment During Year.  Unless otherwise determined by the Committee or required by applicable law or pursuant to any written agreement between the Company and the Executive:

(a)no Bonus shall be payable to an Executive if the Executive is not employed by the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company on the last day of the Performance Period for which the Bonus is otherwise payable, unless the Executive’s employment with the Company and its Subsidiaries terminates during the Performance Period by reason of the Executive’s death or Disability or following a Change in Control; and

(b)in the event of the Executive’s death or Disability during the Performance Period, or in the event of the termination of the Executive’s employment for any reason following a Change in Control that occurs during the Performance Period, the Executive (or the Executive’s legal representative or beneficiary) shall receive a Bonus equal to the product of (i) the Bonus he would have received for the entire Performance Period, multiplied by (ii) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days during the Performance Period in which the Executive was an employee of the Company or its Subsidiaries, and the denominator of which is the number of days in the Performance Period.

Notwithstanding the foregoing or any written agreement between the Company and the Executive, the payment of such Bonus shall be made in accordance with Section 4.9 hereof.

4.6.Accounting Changes.  Subject to Section 5.8, if, after the Performance Target(s) are established for a Performance Period, a change occurs in the applicable accounting principles or practices, the amount of the Bonuses paid under this Plan for such Performance Period shall be determined without regard to such change.

4.7.Committee Discretion to Determine Bonuses.  The Committee has the sole discretion to determine the standard or formula pursuant to which each such Participant’s Bonus shall be calculated (in accordance with Section 4.2), subject in all cases to the terms, conditions and limits of the Plan and of any other written commitment authorized by the Committee. The Committee may at any time establish additional conditions and terms of payment of Bonuses (including, but not limited to the achievement of other financial, strategic or individual goals, which may be objective or subjective) as it may deem desirable in carrying out the purposes of the Plan and may take into account such other factors as it deems appropriate in administering any aspect of the Plan.  For example (without limiting the adjustments to any of the following), subject to Sections 4.6 and 5.8, the Committee may specify, in its sole discretion, at the time the Performance Targets are set, the manner of adjustment of any Performance Target to the extent necessary to prevent dilution or enlargement of any award as a result of extraordinary events or circumstances, as determined by the Committee, or to exclude the effects of (a) extraordinary, unusual, or non-recurring items, (b) changes in applicable laws, regulations, or accounting principles,

A-4



Table of Contents

(c) currency fluctuations, (d) discontinued operations, (e) non-cash items, such as amortization, depreciation, reserves, or asset impairments, or (f) any recapitalization, restructuring, reorganization, merger, acquisition, divestiture, consolidation, spin-off, split-up, combination, liquidation, dissolution, sale of assets, or other similar corporate transaction.  The Committee may not, however, increase the maximum amount permitted to be paid to any individual under Section 4.2 or 4.10 of the Plan or award a Bonus under this Plan if the applicable Performance Target(s) have not been satisfied.

4.8.Committee Certification.  No Executive shall receive any payment under the Plan unless the Committee has certified, by resolution or other appropriate action in writing, that the amount thereof has been accurately determined in accordance with the terms, conditions and limits of the Plan and that the Performance Target(s) and any other material terms previously established by the Committee or set forth in the Plan were in fact satisfied.

4.9.Time of Payment.  Any Bonuses granted by the Committee under the Plan shall be paid as soon as practicable following the Committee’s determinations under this Section 4 and the certification of the Committee’s findings under Section 4.8; provided, however, any such payment shall be made following the end of the Company’s taxable year that coincides with or includes the end of the Performance Period and shall be made no later than the 15th day of the third month following the end of such taxable year of the Company.  If and to the extent permitted by the Committee, and in accordance with such rules as the Committee may from time to time adopt, including compliance with Section 409A of the Code, Participants may, prior to the beginning of any Performance Period, elect to defer the payout of all or any portion of a Bonus relating to such Performance Period.

4.10.Maximum Individual Bonus.  Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, no such Executive shall receive a Bonus under the Plan for any Performance Period in excess of $3,000,000.

4.11.Form of Payment.  Any Bonus shall be paid at the time and in the manner set forth in the Plan, including in accordance with Section 4.9 hereof and shall be in cash, cash equivalents or Shares, as determined by the Committee, subject to applicable withholding requirements.  If and to the extent any payment of a Bonus under this Plan is made in Shares, such payment shall be made as follows:

(a)Issuance and Vesting.  All Shares issued in respect of any Bonus hereunder shall be issued pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Stock Plan and shall reduce the number of Shares available for issuance thereunder.  The date of grant of such Shares shall be the date the Committee certifies the Bonus pursuant to Section 4.8.  The number of Shares issued in respect of any Bonus shall be equal to the amount of the Bonus, divided by the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date the Committee certifies the Bonus pursuant to Section 4.8 (rounded up to the next whole Share).  No fractional Shares shall be issued in payment of any Bonus payment under the Plan.  Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan and the Stock Plan, any Shares may be subject to such terms, including vesting, as determined by the Committee.

(b)Effect of Insufficient Shares.  Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in the event that there are insufficient Shares available for issuance pursuant to the Stock Plan to satisfy amounts owing in respect of the Bonus, the amount of the Bonus which is not able to be satisfied in Shares shall be paid in the form of cash or cash equivalents.

(c)Compliance with Securities Law and Regulations.  The issuance or delivery of Shares pursuant to the Stock Plan or the Plan shall be subject to, and shall comply with, any applicable requirements of federal and state securities laws, rules and regulations (including, without limitation, the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, the Exchange Act, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder), any securities exchange upon which the Shares may be listed and any other law or regulation applicable thereto.  The Company shall not be obligated to issue or deliver any Shares pursuant to the Stock Plan or the Plan if such issuance or delivery would, in the opinion of the Committee, violate any such requirements. The foregoing shall not, however, be deemed to require the Company to issue Shares in respect of amounts to be paid on account of the Bonus if a necessary listing or quotation of the Shares on a stock exchange or inter-dealer quotation system or any registration under state or federal securities laws required under the circumstances has not been accomplished.

A-5



Table of Contents

4.12.Clawback Policy.  Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, acceptance by any Participant of any Bonus or other payment pursuant to the Plan constitutes such person’s acknowledgement and agreement that all Bonuses and any other payments made pursuant to the Plan shall be subject to (a) Section 304 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 and (b) to the extent required under the rules and/or regulations issued pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, any clawback policy adopted by the Company pursuant to such rules and/or regulations.

Section 5.GENERAL PROVISIONS

5.1.No Right to Bonus or Continued Employment.  Neither the establishment of the Plan nor the provision for or payment of any amounts hereunder nor any action of the Company (including, for purposes of this Section 5.1, any predecessor or Subsidiary), the Board or the Committee in respect of the Plan, shall be held or construed to confer upon any person any legal right to receive, or any interest in, a Bonus or any other benefit under the Plan, or any legal right to be continued in the employ of the Company.  The Company expressly reserves any and all rights to discharge an Executive in its sole discretion, without liability of any person, entity or governing body under the Plan or otherwise, except to the extent otherwise provided in any written employment agreement between the Company and the Executive.

5.2.Discretion of the Company, the Board and Committee.  Any decision made or action taken by the Company or by the Board or by the Committee arising out of or in connection with the creation, amendment, construction, administration, interpretation and effect of the Plan shall be within the absolute discretion of such entity and shall be conclusive and binding upon all persons.  No member of the Committee shall have any liability for actions taken or omitted under the Plan by the member or any other person.

5.3.Absence of Liability.  A member of the Board or a member of the Committee or any officer of the Company shall not be liable for any act or inaction hereunder, whether of commission or omission.

5.4.No Funding of Plan.  The Company shall not be required to fund or otherwise segregate any cash or any other assets which may at any time be paid to Participants under the Plan.  The Plan shall constitute an “unfunded” plan of the Company.  The Company shall not, by any provisions of the Plan, be deemed to be a trustee of any property, and any obligations of the Company to any Participant under the Plan shall be those of a debtor and any rights of any Participant or former Participant shall be limited to those of a general unsecured creditor.

5.5.Non-Transferability of Benefits and Interests.  Except as expressly provided by the Committee, no benefit payable under the Plan shall be subject in any manner to anticipation, alienation, sale, transfer, assignment, pledge, encumbrance or charge, and any such attempted action shall be void and no such benefit shall be in any manner liable for or subject to debts, contracts, liabilities, engagements or torts of any Participant or former Participant.  This Section 5.5 shall not apply to an assignment of a contingency or payment due after the death of the Executive to the deceased Executive’s legal representative or beneficiary.

5.6.Law to Govern.  All questions pertaining to the construction, regulation, validity and effect of the provisions of the Plan shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas.

5.7.Non-Exclusivity.  Subject to Section 5.8, the Plan does not limit the authority of the Company, the Board or the Committee, or any Subsidiary of the Company, to grant awards or authorize any other compensation under any other plan or authority, including, without limitation, awards or other compensation based on the same Performance Target(s) used under the Plan.  In addition, Executives not selected to participate in the Plan may participate in other plans of the Company.

5.8.Section 162(m) Conditions; Bifurcation of Plan.  It is the intent of the Company that the Plan and Bonuses paid hereunder satisfy and be interpreted in a manner, that, in the case of Participants who are or may be persons whose compensation is subject to Section 162(m), satisfies any applicable requirements as performance-based compensation.  Any provision, application or interpretation of the Plan inconsistent with this intent to satisfy the standards in Section 162(m) of the Code shall be disregarded. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan, the provisions of the Plan may at any time be bifurcated by the Board or the Committee in any

A-6



Table of Contents

manner so that certain provisions of the Plan or any Bonus intended or required in order to satisfy the applicable requirements of Section 162(m) are only applicable to persons whose compensation is subject to Section 162(m).

5.9.Adopting Employer.  Helen of Troy Nevada Corporation, a Nevada corporation, is an adopting employer to the Plan.

5.10Section 409A of the Code.  Except to the extent a Bonus is deferred pursuant to Section 4.9, the Plan and the Bonuses paid hereunder are intended to meet the “short-term deferral” exemption to the provisions of Section 409A of the Code and the Treasury regulations issued thereunder or otherwise to comply with Section 409A of the Code and the Treasury regulations and guidance issued thereunder.  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, the Plan shall be interpreted and construed consistent with this intent.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company shall not be required to assume any increased economic burden in connection therewith.

5.11Section 457A of the Code.  It is the intent of the Company that the Plan and all Bonuses paid to U.S. taxpayers hereunder will comply with Section 457A of the Code and the provisions of the Plan shall be interpreted and construed consistent with this intent.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event the Plan is found not to comply with Section 457A, the Company shall not be required to assume any increased economic burden in connection therewith.

5.12ConflictIn the event of any conflict between the terms of any written agreement between the Company and the Executive and this Plan regarding the payment of the Bonus upon termination of employment with the Company, including any termination of employment following a Change in Control or upon Disability or any analogous term or the application so Section 5.11 hereof, the terms of the written agreement shall be deemed to control.  Notwithstanding the foregoing or any written agreement between the Company and the Executive, the payment of any Bonus shall be made in accordance with Sections 4.8, 4.9 and 4.10 hereof.

Section 6.EFFECTIVE DATE, AMENDMENTS, SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF PLAN

The Plan shall be effective as of March 1, 2014, subject to its approval by shareholders of the Company at the annual general meeting of shareholders to be held August 26, 2014, or any adjournment or postponement thereof.  The Board or the Committee may from time to time amend, suspend or terminate in whole or in part, and if suspended or terminated, may reinstate, any or all of the provisions of the Plan.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, no amendment may be effective without Board and/or shareholder approval if such approval is necessary to comply with the applicable rules under Section 162(m) of the Code.  No additional Bonuses may be payable after termination of the Plan.  Termination of the Plan shall not affect any Bonuses due and outstanding on the date of termination and such Bonuses shall continue to be subject to the terms of the Plan notwithstanding its termination.

Section 7.AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT

This Plan amends, restates and supersedes the provisions of the Helen of Troy Limited 2011 Annual Incentive Plan effective as of March 1, 2012, in their entirety.

A-7



Table of Contents

 

Register of Members

the register of members referred to in these Bye-laws;

Resident Representative

any person appointed to act as resident representative and includes any deputy or assistant resident representative;

Secretary

the person appointed to perform any or all of the duties of secretary of the Company and includes any deputy or assistant secretary and any person appointed by the Board to perform any of the duties of the Secretary; and

Treasury Share

a share of the Company that was or is treated as having been acquired and held by the Company and has been held continuously by the Company since it was so acquired and has not been cancelled.

1.2In these Bye-laws, where not inconsistent with the context:

(a)words denoting the plural number include the singular number and vice versa;

(b)words denoting the masculine gender include the feminine and neuter genders;

(c)words importing persons include companies, associations or bodies of persons whether corporate or not;

(d)the words:

(i)“may” shall be construed as permissive; and

(ii)“shall” shall be construed as imperative;

(e)a reference to statutory provision shall be deemed to include any amendment or re-enactment thereof;

(f)the phrase “issued and outstanding” in relation to shares, means shares in issue other than treasury shares;

(g)the word “corporation” means a corporation whether or not a company within the meaning of the Act; and

(h)unless otherwise provided herein, words or expressions defined in the Act shall bear the same meaning in these Bye-laws.

A-2



Table of Contents

1.3In these Bye-laws expressions referring to writing or its cognates shall, unless the contrary intention appears, include facsimile, printing, lithography, photography, electronic mail and other modes of representing words in visible form.

1.4Headings used in these Bye-laws are for convenience only and are not to be used or relied upon in the construction hereof.

SHARES

2.Power to Issue Shares

2.1Subject to these Bye-laws and to any resolution of the Members to the contrary, and without prejudice to any special rights previously conferred on the holders of any existing shares or class of shares, the Board shall have the power to issue any unissued shares on such terms and conditions as it may determine and any shares or class of shares may be issued with such preferred, deferred or other special rights or such restrictions, whether in regard to dividend, voting, return of capital, or otherwise as the Company may by resolution of the Members prescribe.

3.Power of the Company to Purchase its Shares

3.1The Company may purchase its own shares for cancellation or acquire them as Treasury Shares in accordance with the Act on such terms as the Board shall think fit.

3.2The Board may exercise all the powers of the Company to purchase or acquire all or any part of its own shares in accordance with the Act.

4.Rights Attaching to Shares

4.1The authorised share capital of the Company may be divided into common shares (“Common Shares”) and preference shares (“Preference Shares”).

4.2The holders of Common Shares shall, subject to these Bye-laws (including, without limitation, the rights attaching to Preference Shares):

(a)be entitled to one vote per share;

(b)be entitled to such dividends as the Board may from time to time declare;

(c)in the event of a winding-up or dissolution of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary or for the purpose of a reorganisation or otherwise or

A-3



Table of Contents

upon any distribution of capital, be entitled to the surplus assets of the Company; and

(d)generally be entitled to enjoy all of the rights attaching to shares.

4.3The Preference Shares may be issued from time to time in one or more classes.  The Board hereby is authorized to fix or alter by resolution or resolutions, the designations, preferences and relative participating, optional or other special rights of the shares of each such class and the qualifications, limitations, or restrictions thereon, including but not limited to, determination of the dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rights, voting rights, rights in terms of redemption (including sinking fund provisions), redemption price or prices and liquidation preferences of any wholly unissued class of Preference Shares and the number of shares constituting any such class and the designation thereof or any of them; and to increase or decrease the number of shares of any class subsequent to the issue of shares of such class then outstanding.  In case the number of shares of any class shall be so decreased, the shares constituting such decrease shall resume the status which they had prior to the adoption of the resolution originally fixing the number of shares in such class.

4.4At the discretion of the Board, whether or not in connection with the issuance and sale of any shares or other securities of the Company, the Company may issue securities, contracts, warrants or other instruments evidencing any shares, option rights, securities having conversion or option rights, or obligations on such terms, conditions and other provisions as are fixed by the Board.

4.5All the rights attaching to a Treasury Share shall be suspended and shall not be exercised by the Company while it holds such Treasury Share and, except where required by the Act, all Treasury Shares shall be excluded from the calculation of any percentage or fraction of the share capital, or shares, of the Company.

5.Calls on Shares

5.1The Board may make such calls as it thinks fit upon the Members in respect of any moneys (whether in respect of nominal value or premium) unpaid on the shares allotted to or held by such Members (and not made payable at fixed times by the terms and conditions of issue) and, if a call is not paid on or before the day appointed for payment thereof, the Member may at the discretion of the Board be liable to pay the Company interest on the amount of such call at such rate as the Board may determine, from the date when such call was payable up to the actual date of payment.  The Board may differentiate between the holders as to the amount of calls to be paid and the times of payment of such calls.

5.2Any amount which, by the terms of allotment of a share becomes payable upon issue or at any fixed date, whether on account of the nominal value of the share or by way of

A-4



Table of Contents

premium, shall for the purposes of these Bye-laws be deemed to be an amount on which a call has been duly made and payable on the date on which, by the terms of issue, the same becomes payable, and in case of non-payment all the relevant provisions of these Bye-laws as to payment of interest, costs and expenses, forfeiture or otherwise shall apply as if such amount had become payable by virtue of a duly made and notified call.

5.3The joint holders of a share shall be jointly and severally liable to pay all calls and any interest, costs and expenses in respect thereof.

5.4The Company may accept from any Member the whole or a part of the amount remaining unpaid on any shares held by such Member, although no part of that amount has been called up or become payable.

6.Forfeiture of Shares

6.1If any Member fails to pay, on the day appointed for payment thereof, any call in respect of any share allotted to or held by such Member, the Board may, at any time thereafter during such time as the call remains unpaid, direct the Secretary to forward such Member a notice in writing in the form, or as near thereto as circumstances admit, of the following:

Notice of Liability to Forfeiture for Non-Payment of Call

[Name of Company] (the “Company”)

You have failed to pay the call of [amount of call] made on [date], in respect of the [number] share(s) [number in figures] standing in your name in the Register of Members of the Company, on [date], the day appointed for payment of such call.  You are hereby notified that unless you pay such call together with interest thereon at the rate of [ ] per annum computed from the said [date] at the registered office of the Company the share(s) will be liable to be forfeited.

Dated this [date]

[Signature of Secretary] By Order of the Board

A-5



Table of Contents

6.2If the requirements of such notice are not complied with, any such share may at any time thereafter before the payment of such call and the interest due in respect thereof be forfeited by a resolution of the Board to that effect, and such share shall thereupon become the property of the Company and may be disposed of as the Board shall determine. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the disposal may take place by sale, repurchase, redemption or any other method of disposal permitted by and consistent with these Bye-laws and the Act.

6.3A Member whose share or shares have been so forfeited shall, notwithstanding such forfeiture, be liable to pay to the Company all calls owing on such share or shares at the time of the forfeiture, together with all interest due thereon and any costs and expenses incurred by the Company in connection therewith.

6.4The Board may accept the surrender of any shares which it is in a position to forfeit on such terms and conditions as may be agreed.  Subject to those terms and conditions, a surrendered share shall be treated as if it had been forfeited.

7.Share Certificates

7.1Every Member shall be entitled to a certificate under the common seal of the Company (or a facsimile thereof) or bearing the signature (or a facsimile thereof) of a Director or Officer or a person expressly authorized to sign specifying the number and, where appropriate, the class of shares held by such Member and whether the same are fully paid up and, if not, specifying the amount paid on such shares.  The Board may by resolution determine, either generally or in a particular case, that any or all signatures on certificates may be printed thereon or affixed by mechanical means.

7.2The Company shall be under no obligation to complete and deliver a share certificate unless specifically called upon to do so by the person to whom the shares have been allotted.

7.3If any share certificate shall be proved to the satisfaction of the Board to have been worn out, lost, mislaid, or destroyed the Board may cause a new certificate to be issued and request an indemnity for the lost certificate if it sees fit.

7.4Notwithstanding any provisions of these Bye-laws, the Directors shall, subject always to the Act and any other applicable laws and regulations and the facilities and requirements of any relevant system concerned, have power to implement any arrangements they may, in their absolute discretion, think fit in relation to the evidencing of title to and transfer of uncertificated shares and to the extent such arrangements are so implemented, no provision of these Bye-laws shall apply or have

A-6



Table of Contents

effect to the extent that it is in any respect inconsistent with the holding or transfer of shares in uncertificated form.

8.Fractional Shares

The Company may issue its shares in fractional denominations and deal with such fractions to the same extent as its whole shares and shares in fractional denominations shall have in proportion to the respective fractions represented thereby all of the rights of whole shares including (but without limiting the generality of the foregoing) the right to vote, to receive dividends and distributions and to participate in a winding-up.

REGISTRATION OF SHARES

9.Register of Members

9.1The Board shall cause to be kept in one or more books a Register of Members and shall enter therein the particulars required by the Act.

9.2The Register of Members shall be open to inspection without charge at the registered office of the Company on every business day, subject to such reasonable restrictions as the Board may impose, so that not less than two hours in each business day be allowed for inspection.  The Register of Members may, after notice has been given in accordance with the Act, be closed for any time or times not exceeding in the whole thirty days in each year.

10.Registered Holder Absolute Owner

The Company shall be entitled to treat the registered holder of any share as the absolute owner thereof and accordingly shall not be bound to recognise any equitable claim or other claim to, or interest in, such share on the part of any other person.

11.Transfer of Registered Shares

11.1An instrument of transfer shall be in writing in the form of the following, or as near thereto as circumstances admit, or in such other form as the Board may accept:

A-7



Table of Contents

Transfer of a Share or Shares

[        ] (the “Company”)

FOR VALUE RECEIVED……………….. [amount], I, [name of transferor] hereby sell, assign and transfer unto [transferee] of [address], [number] shares of the Company.

DATED this [date]

Signed by:

In the presence of:

Transferor

Witness

Signed by:

In the presence of:

Transferee

Witness

11.2Such instrument of transfer shall be signed by (or in the case of a party that is a corporation, on behalf of) the transferor and transferee, provided that, in the case of a fully paid up share, the Board may accept the instrument signed by or on behalf of the transferor alone.  The transferor shall be deemed to remain the holder of such share until the same has been registered as having been transferred to the transferee in the Register of Members.

11.3The Board may refuse to recognise any instrument of transfer unless it is accompanied by the certificate in respect of the shares to which it relates and by such other evidence as the Board may reasonably require showing the right of the transferor to make the transfer.

11.4The joint holders of any share may transfer such share to one or more of such joint holders, and the surviving holder or holders of any share previously held by them jointly with a deceased Member may transfer any such share to the executors or administrators of such deceased Member.

11.5The Board may in its absolute discretion and without assigning any reason therefor refuse to register the transfer of a share which is not fully paid up.  The Board shall refuse to register a transfer unless all applicable consents, authorisations and permissions of any governmental body or agency in Bermuda have been obtained.  If

A-8



Table of Contents

the Board refuses to register a transfer of any share the Secretary shall, within three months after the date on which the transfer was lodged with the Company, send to the transferor and transferee notice of the refusal.

11.6Shares may be transferred without a written instrument if transferred by an appointed agent or otherwise in accordance with the Act.

11.7Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in these Bye-laws, shares that are listed or admitted to trading on an appointed stock exchange may be transferred in accordance with the rules and regulations of such exchange.

12.Transmission of Registered Shares

12.1In the case of the death of a Member, the survivor or survivors where the deceased Member was a joint holder, and the legal personal representatives of the deceased Member where the deceased Member was a sole holder, shall be the only persons recognised by the Company as having any title to the deceased Member’s interest in the shares.  Nothing herein contained shall release the estate of a deceased joint holder from any liability in respect of any share which had been jointly held by such deceased Member with other persons.  Subject to the Act, for the purpose of this Bye-law, legal personal representative means the executor or administrator of a deceased Member or such other person as the Board may, in its absolute discretion, decide as being properly authorised to deal with the shares of a deceased Member.

12.2Any person becoming entitled to a share in consequence of the death or bankruptcy of any Member may be registered as a Member upon such evidence as the Board may deem sufficient or may elect to nominate some person to be registered as a transferee of such share, and in such case the person becoming entitled shall execute in favour of such nominee an instrument of transfer in writing in the form, or as near thereto as circumstances admit, of the following:

Transfer by a Person Becoming Entitled on Death/Bankruptcy of a Member

[Name of Company] (the “Company”)

I/We, having become entitled in consequence of the [death/bankruptcy] of [name and address of deceased/bankrupt Member] to [number] share(s) standing in the Register of Members of the Company in the name of the said [name of deceased/bankrupt Member] instead of being registered myself/ourselves, elect to have [name of transferee] (the “Transferee”) registered as a transferee of such share(s) and I/we do hereby accordingly transfer the said share(s) to the Transferee to hold the same unto the Transferee, his or her executors, administrators and assigns, subject to the conditions on which the same were held at the time of the execution hereof;

A-9



Table of Contents

and the Transferee does hereby agree to take the said share(s) subject to the same conditions.

DATED this [date]

Signed by:

In the presence of:

Transferor

Witness

Signed by:

In the presence of:

Transferee

Witness

12.3On the presentation of the foregoing materials to the Board, accompanied by such evidence as the Board may require to prove the title of the transferor, the transferee shall be registered as a Member.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board shall, in any case, have the same right to decline or suspend registration as it would have had in the case of a transfer of the share by that Member before such Member’s death or bankruptcy, as the case may be.

12.4Where two or more persons are registered as joint holders of a share or shares, then in the event of the death of any joint holder or holders the remaining joint holder or holders shall be absolutely entitled to such share or shares and the Company shall recognise no claim in respect of the estate of any joint holder except in the case of the last survivor of such joint holders.

A-10



Table of Contents

ALTERATION OF SHARE CAPITAL

13.Power to Alter Capital

13.1The Company may if authorised by resolution of the Members increase, divide, consolidate, subdivide, change the currency denomination of, diminish or otherwise alter or reduce its share capital in any manner permitted by the Act.

13.2Where, on any alteration or reduction of share capital, fractions of shares or some other difficulty would arise, the Board may deal with or resolve the same in such manner as it thinks fit.

14.Variation of Rights Attaching to Shares

If, at any time, the share capital is divided into different classes of shares, the rights attached to any class (unless otherwise provided by the terms of issue of the shares of that class) may, whether or not the Company is being wound-up, be varied with the consent in writing of the holders of three-fourths of the issued shares of that class or with the sanction of a resolution passed by a majority of the votes cast at a separate general meeting of the holders of the shares of the class in accordance with Section 47 (7) of the Act.  The rights conferred upon the holders of the shares of any class or series issued with preferred or other rights shall not, unless otherwise expressly provided by the terms of issue of the shares of that class or series, be deemed to be varied by the creation or issue of further shares ranking pari passu therewith.

DIVIDENDS AND CAPITALISATION

15.Dividends

15.1The Board may, subject to these Bye-laws and in accordance with the Act, declare a dividend to be paid to the Members, in proportion to the number of shares held by them, and such dividend may be paid in cash or wholly or partly in specie in which case the Board may fix the value for distribution in specie of any assets. No unpaid dividend shall bear interest as against the Company.

15.2The Board may fix any date as the record date for determining the Members entitled to receive any dividend.

15.3The Company may pay dividends in proportion to the amount paid up on each share where a larger amount is paid up on some shares than on others.

15.4The Board may declare and make such other distributions (in cash or in specie) to the Members as may be lawfully made out of the assets of the Company.  No unpaid distribution shall bear interest as against the Company.

A-11



Table of Contents

16.Power to Set Aside Profits

The Board may, before declaring a dividend, set aside out of the surplus or profits of the Company, such amount as it thinks proper as a reserve to be used to meet contingencies or for equalising dividends or for any other purpose.

17.Method of Payment

17.1Any dividend, interest, or other moneys payable in cash in respect of the shares may be paid by cheque or draft sent through the post directed to the Member at such Member’s address in the Register of Members, or to such person and to such address as the holder may in writing direct.

17.2In the case of joint holders of shares, any dividend, interest or other moneys payable in cash in respect of shares may be paid by cheque or draft sent through the post directed to the address of the holder first named in the Register of Members, or to such person and to such address as the joint holders may in writing direct.  If two or more persons are registered as joint holders of any shares any one can give an effectual receipt for any dividend paid in respect of such shares.

17.3The Board may deduct from the dividends or distributions payable to any Member all moneys due from such Member to the Company on account of calls or otherwise.

17.4Any dividend and/or other moneys payable in respect of a share which has remained unclaimed for 7 years from the date when it became due for payment shall, if the Board so resolves, be forfeited and cease to remain owing by the Company.  The payment of any unclaimed dividend or other moneys payable in respect of a share may (but need not) be paid by the Company into an account separate from the Company’s own account.  Such payment shall not constitute the Company a trustee in respect thereof.

17.5The Company shall be entitled to cease sending dividend cheques and drafts by post or otherwise to a Member if those instruments have been returned undelivered to, or left uncashed by, that Member on at least two consecutive occasions, or, following one such occasion, reasonable enquiries have failed to establish the Member’s new address.  The entitlement conferred on the Company by this Bye-law 17.5 in respect of any Member shall cease if the Member claims a dividend or cashes a dividend cheque or draft.

18.Capitalisation

18.1The Board may capitalise any amount for the time being standing to the credit of any of the Company’s share premium or other reserve accounts or to the credit of the profit and loss account or otherwise available for distribution by applying such amount in paying up unissued shares to be allotted as fully paid bonus shares pro-rata (except in connection with the conversion of shares of one class to shares of another class) to the Members.

A-12



Table of Contents

18.2The Board may capitalise any amount for the time being standing to the credit of a reserve account or amounts otherwise available for dividend or distribution by applying such amounts in paying up in full, partly or nil paid shares of those Members who would have been entitled to such amounts if they were distributed by way of dividend or distribution.

MEETINGS OF MEMBERS

19.Annual General Meetings

Notwithstanding the provisions of the Act entitling the Members of the Company to elect to dispense with the holding of an annual general meeting, an annual general meeting shall be held in each year (other than the year of incorporation) at such time and place as the president or the chairman of the Company (if any) or any two Directors or any Director and the Secretary or the Board shall appoint.

20.Special General Meetings

The president or the chairman of the Company (if any) or any two Directors or any Director and the Secretary or the Board may convene a special general meeting whenever in their judgment such a meeting is necessary.

21.Requisitioned General Meetings and Member Proposals

21.1Proposal of business to be transacted by the Members may only be made at a meeting of Members (i) pursuant to the Company’s notice and proxy materials for such meeting, (ii) by or at the direction of the Board of Directors, or (iii) by any Member of record of the Company at the time of the giving of the notice required in this Bye-law who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has complied with the notice procedures set forth in this Bye-law. For the avoidance of doubt, the foregoing clause (iii) shall be the exclusive means for a Member to propose business at a meeting of Members.

21.2For business proposals to be properly brought before a meeting by a Member of record pursuant to clause (iii) of Bye-law 21.1, (i) the Member of record must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the Secretary of the Company, (ii) the Member of record must provide to the Secretary of the Company any updates or supplements to such notice at the times and in the forms specified in this Bye-law, (iii) any such business must be a proper matter for Member action under Bermuda law, and (iv) the Member of record and the beneficial owner or owners, if any, on whose behalf any such business proposal is made, must have acted in accordance with the representations set forth in the Business Proposal Solicitation Statement (as defined in Bye-law 21.4(j)).

21.3Where a business proposal is to be brought before an annual general meeting, to be timely, a notice by a Member of record must be received by the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Company not less than 60 or more than 90 days prior to the date of the annual general meeting. Where a business proposal is to be brought

A-13



Table of Contents

before a special general meeting, such notice must be given not later than 10 days following the earlier of the date on which notice of the special general meeting was posted to Members or the date on which public disclosure of the date of the special general meeting was made. In no event shall an adjournment, or postponement of a meeting for which notice has been given, commence a new time period for the giving of a Member of record’s notice. For purposes of these Bye-laws, “public announcement” or “public disclosure” shall mean disclosure in a press release reported by a national news service or in a document publically filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13, 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

21.4As to (1) the Member of record giving the notice and (2) the beneficial owner or owners, if any, or other persons on whose behalf the business proposal is made or acting in concert therewith (each, a “party”), the notice shall set forth:

(a)the name and address of such party;

(b)the class, series, and number of shares of the Company that are owned, directly or indirectly, beneficially and of record by each such party;

(c)any option, warrant, convertible security, stock appreciation right, or similar right with an exercise or conversion privilege or providing for a settlement payment or mechanism based on the price of any class or series of shares of the Company or with a value derived in whole or in part from the value of any class or series of shares of the Company, whether or not such instrument or right shall be subject to settlement in the underlying class or series of capital stock of the Company or otherwise (a “Derivative Instrument”) directly or indirectly owned beneficially by each such party or such beneficial owner, and any other direct or indirect opportunity to profit or share in any profit derived from any increase or decrease in the value of shares of the Company, including a description of all agreements, arrangements, understandings or relationships (including any short interest or other borrowing arrangements) engaged in directly or indirectly, by such party or such beneficial owner, the purpose or effect of which is to mitigate loss to, reduce the economic risk (or ownership or otherwise) of any class or series of shares of the Company, manage the risk of share price changes for, or increase or decrease the voting power of, such party or beneficial owner, or which provides, directly or indirectly, such party or beneficial owner with the opportunity to profit or share in any profit from any decrease in the price or value of the shares of any class or series of shares of the Company;

(d)a description of all agreements, arrangements, understandings or relationships between such party and any material interest of such party in the proposed business;

(e)any proportionate interest in shares of the Company or Derivative Instruments held, directly or indirectly, by a general or limited partnership in which any

A-14



Table of Contents

party is a general partner or, directly or indirectly, beneficially owns an interest in a general partner;

(f)any performance-related fees (other than an asset-based fee) that each Member is directly or indirectly entitled to based on any increase or decrease in the value of shares of the Company or Derivative Instruments, if any, as of the date of such notice, including without limitation any such interests held by members of each such party’s immediate family sharing the same household (which information set forth in this paragraph shall be supplemented by such party or such beneficial owner or other person, as the case may be, not later than 10 days after the record date for the meeting to disclose such ownership as of the record date);

(g)any proxy, contract, arrangement, understanding or relationship pursuant to which any party, either directly or acting in concert with another person or persons, has a right to vote, directly or indirectly, any shares of any security of the Company;

(h)any rights to dividends on the shares of the Company owned beneficially directly or indirectly by each such party that are separated or separable from the underlying shares of the Company;

(i)a representation that such party intends to appear in person or by proxy at the general meeting to propose such business;

(j)a statement as to whether or not each such party will deliver a proxy statement and form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of voting power of all of the shares of capital stock of the Company required under applicable law to approve the proposal (such statement, a “Business Proposal Solicitation Statement”); and

(k)any other information relating to each such party that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for, as applicable, the business proposal pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act (whether or not such Member intends to deliver a proxy statement or conduct its own proxy solicitation).

A-15



Table of Contents

21.5A Member of record providing notice of business proposed to be brought before a meeting shall further update and supplement such notice, if necessary, so that the information provided or required to be provided in such notice pursuant to this Bye-law  shall be true and correct as of the record date for the meeting and as of the date that is ten (10) business days prior to the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, and such update and supplement shall be delivered to, or mailed and received by, the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Company not later than five (5)  business days after the record date for the meeting (in the case of the update and supplement required to be made as of the record date), and not later than five (5)  business days prior to the date for the meeting, if practicable (or, if not practicable, on the first practicable date prior to) any adjournment or postponement thereof (in the case of the update and supplement required to be made as of ten (10) business days prior to the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof).

21.6Only such business shall be conducted at an annual meeting of Members as shall have been brought before the meeting in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Bye-law.  The chair of the meeting shall have the power and the duty to determine whether any business proposed to be brought before the meeting has been made in accordance with the procedures set forth in these Bye-laws and, if any proposed business is not in compliance with these Bye-laws, to declare that such proposed business shall not be presented for Member action at the meeting and shall be disregarded.

21.7Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Bye-law, a Member shall also comply with all applicable requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder with respect to matters set forth in this Bye-law. Nothing in this Bye-law shall be deemed to affect any rights of Members to request inclusion of non-binding proposals in the Company’s proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act.

22.Notice

22.1At least ten (10) and not more than sixty (60) days’ notice of an annual general meeting shall be given to each Member entitled to attend and vote thereat, stating the date, place and time at which the meeting is to be held, that the election of Directors will take place thereat, and as far as practicable, the other business to be conducted at the meeting.

22.2At least ten (10) and not more than sixty (60) days’ notice of a special general meeting shall be given to each Member entitled to attend and vote thereat, stating the date, time, place and the general nature of the business to be considered at the meeting.

22.3The Board may fix any date as the record date for determining the Members entitled to receive notice of and to vote at any general meeting.

A-16



Table of Contents

22.4A general meeting shall, notwithstanding that it is called on shorter notice than that specified in these Bye-laws, be deemed to have been properly called if it is so agreed by (i) all the Members entitled to attend and vote thereat in the case of an annual general meeting; and (ii) by a majority in number of the Members having the right to attend and vote at the meeting, being a majority together holding not less than 95% in nominal value of the shares giving a right to attend and vote thereat in the case of a special general meeting.

22.5The accidental omission to give notice of a general meeting to, or the non-receipt of a notice of a general meeting by, any person entitled to receive notice shall not invalidate the proceedings at that meeting.

A-17



Table of Contents

23.Giving Notice and Access

23.1A notice may be given by the Company to a Member:

a)by delivering it to such Member in person, in which case the notice shall be deemed to have been served upon such delivery; or

b)by sending it by post to such Member’s address in the Register of Members, in which case the notice shall be deemed to have been served seven days after the date on which it is deposited, with postage prepaid, in the mail; or

c)by sending it by courier to such Member’s address in the Register of Members, in which case the notice shall be deemed to have been served two days after the date on which it is deposited, with courier fees paid, with the courier service; or

d)by transmitting it by electronic means (including facsimile and electronic mail, but not telephone) in accordance with such directions as may be given by such Member to the Company for such purpose, in which case the notice shall be deemed to have been served at the time that it would in the ordinary course be transmitted; or

e)by delivering it in accordance with the provisions of the Act pertaining to delivery of electronic records by publication on a website, in which case the notice shall be deemed to have been served at the time when the requirements of the Act in that regard have been met.

23.2Any notice required to be given to a Member shall, with respect to any shares held jointly by two or more persons, be given to whichever of such persons is named first in the Register of Members and notice so given shall be sufficient notice to all the holders of such shares.

23.3In proving service under paragraphs(b), (c) and (d), it shall be sufficient to prove that the notice was properly addressed and prepaid, if posted or sent by courier, and the time when it was posted, deposited with the courier, or transmitted by electronic means.

24.Postponement or Cancellation of General Meeting

The Secretary may, and on the instruction of the chairman or president of the Company or the Board, the Secretary shall, postpone or cancel any general meeting called in accordance with these Bye-laws (other than a meeting requisitioned under these Bye-laws) provided that notice of postponement or cancellation is given to the Members before the time for such meeting.  Fresh notice of the date, time and place for a postponed meeting shall be given to each Member in accordance with these Bye-laws.

25.Electronic Participation and Security in Meetings

25.1Members may participate in any general meeting by such telephonic, electronic or other communications facilities or means as permit all persons participating in the

A-18



Table of Contents

meeting to communicate with each other simultaneously and instantaneously, and participation in such a meeting shall constitute presence in person at such meeting.

25.2The Board may, and at any general meeting, the chairman of such meeting may, make any arrangement and impose any requirement or restriction it or he considers appropriate to ensure the security of a general meeting including, without limitation, requirements for evidence of identity to be produced by those attending the meeting, the searching of their personal property and the restriction of items that may be taken into the meeting place.  The Board and, at any general meeting, the chairman of such meeting are entitled to refuse entry to a person who refuses to comply with any such arrangements, requirements or restrictions.

26.Quorum at General Meetings

26.1At any general meeting two or more persons present in person throughout the meeting and representing in person or by proxy in excess of 50% of the total voting rights of all issued and outstanding shares in the Company shall form a quorum for the transaction of business.

26.2If within half an hour from the time appointed for the meeting a quorum is not present, then, in the case of a meeting convened on a requisition, the meeting shall be deemed cancelled and, in any other case, the meeting shall stand adjourned to the same day one week later, at the same time and place or to such other day, time or place as the Secretary may determine. Unless the meeting is adjourned to a specific date, place and time announced at the meeting being adjourned, fresh notice of the resumption of the meeting shall be given to each Member entitled to attend and vote thereat in accordance with these Bye-laws.

27.Chairman to Preside at General Meetings

Unless otherwise agreed by a majority of those attending and entitled to vote at a general meeting, the chairman of the Company, if there be one who is present, and if not the president of the Company, if there be one who is present, shall act as chairman of such meeting.  In their absence a chairman of the meeting shall be appointed or elected by those present at the meeting and entitled to vote.

28.Voting on Resolutions

28.1[Subject to the Act and these Bye-laws, at elections of directors at any general meeting at which a quorum is present, a director shall, except in a contested election, be elected by the affirmative votes of a majority of the votes cast in accordance with these Bye-laws in favour of such nominee by the Members entitled to vote in the election. In a contested election, a director shall be elected by a plurality of the votes cast in accordance with these Bye-laws in favour of such nominee by the Members entitled to vote in the election. An election shall be considered to be contested if, as of the record date for such general meeting, there are more nominees for election than positions on the Board to be filled by election at that general meeting.]  Except as otherwise provided by the Act and these Bye-laws, any question proposed for the consideration

A-19



Table of Contents

of the Members at any general meeting shall be decided by the affirmative votes of a majority of the votes cast in accordance with these Bye-laws and in the case of an equality of votes the resolution shall fail.

28.2No Member shall be entitled to vote at a general meeting unless such Member has paid all the calls on all shares held by such Member.

28.3At any general meeting a resolution put to the vote of the meeting shall, in the first instance, be voted upon by a show of hands and, subject to any rights or restrictions for the time being lawfully attached to any class of shares and subject to these Bye-laws, every Member present in person and every person holding a valid proxy at such meeting shall be entitled to one vote and shall cast such vote by raising his hand.

28.4In the event that a Member participates in a general meeting by telephone, electronic or other communications facilities or means, the chairman of the meeting shall direct the manner in which such Member may cast his vote on a show of hands.

28.5At any general meeting if an amendment is proposed to any resolution under consideration and the chairman of the meeting rules on whether or not the proposed amendment is out of order, the proceedings on the substantive resolution shall not be invalidated by any error in such ruling.

28.6At any general meeting a declaration by the chairman of the meeting that a question proposed for consideration has, on a show of hands, been carried, or carried unanimously, or by a particular majority, or lost, and an entry to that effect in a book containing the minutes of the proceedings of the Company shall, subject to these Bye-laws, be conclusive evidence of that fact.

29.Power to Demand a Vote on a Poll

29.1Notwithstanding the foregoing, a poll may be demanded by any of the following persons:

(a)the chairman of such meeting; or

(b)at least three Members present in person or represented by proxy; or

(c)any Member or Members present in person or represented by proxy and holding between them not less than one-tenth of the total voting rights of all the Members having the right to vote at such meeting; or

(d)any Member or Members present in person or represented by proxy holding shares in the Company conferring the right to vote at such meeting, being shares on which an aggregate sum has been paid up equal to not less than one-tenth of the total amount paid up on all such shares conferring such right.

29.2Where a poll is demanded, subject to any rights or restrictions for the time being lawfully attached to any class of shares, every person present at such meeting shall have one vote for each share of which such person is the holder or for which such person holds a proxy and such vote shall be counted by ballot as described herein, or

A-20



Table of Contents

in the case of a general meeting at which one or more Members are present by telephone, electronic or other communication facilities or means, in such manner as the chairman of the meeting may direct and the result of such poll shall be deemed to be the resolution of the meeting at which the poll was demanded and shall replace any previous resolution upon the same matter which has been the subject of a show of hands.  A person entitled to more than one vote need not use all his votes or cast all the votes he uses in the same way.

29.3A poll demanded for the purpose of electing a chairman of the meeting or on a question of adjournment shall be taken forthwith.  A poll demanded on any other question shall be taken at such time and in such manner during such meeting as the chairman (or acting chairman) of the meeting may direct.  Any business other than that upon which a poll has been demanded may be conducted pending the taking of the poll.

29.4Where a vote is taken by poll, each person physically present and entitled to vote shall be furnished with a ballot paper on which such person shall record his vote in such manner as shall be determined at the meeting having regard to the nature of the question on which the vote is taken, and each ballot paper shall be signed or initialled or otherwise marked so as to identify the voter and the registered holder in the case of a proxy.  Each person present by telephone, electronic or other communications facilities or means shall cast his vote in such manner as the chairman shall direct.  At the conclusion of the poll, the ballot papers and votes cast in accordance with such directions shall be examined and counted by a committee of not less than two Members or proxy holders appointed by the chairman of the meeting for the purpose and the result of the poll shall be declared by the chairman of the meeting.

30.Voting by Joint Holders of Shares

In the case of joint holders, the vote of the senior who tenders a vote (whether in person or by proxy) shall be accepted to the exclusion of the votes of the other joint holders, and for this purpose seniority shall be determined by the order in which the names stand in the Register of Members.

A-21



Table of Contents

31.Instrument of Proxy

31.1A Member may appoint a proxy by

(a)an instrument in writing in substantially the following form or such other form as the Board or the chairman of the meeting shall accept:

Proxy

[Name of Company] (the “Company”)

I/We, [insert names here] , being a Member of the Company with [number] shares, HEREBY APPOINT [name] of [address] or failing him, [name] of [address] to be my/our proxy to vote for me/us at the meeting of the Members to be held on [date] and at any adjournment thereof.  [Any restrictions on voting to be inserted here.]

Signed this [date]

Member(s)

or

(b)such telephonic, electronic or other means as may be approved by the Board from time to time.

31.2The appointment of a proxy must be received by the Company at the registered office or at such other place or in such manner as is specified in the notice convening the meeting or in any instrument of proxy sent out by the Company in relation to the meeting at which the person named in the appointment proposes to vote, and appointment of a proxy which is not received in the manner so permitted shall be invalid.

31.3A Member who is the holder of two or more shares may appoint more than one proxy to represent him and vote on his behalf in respect of different shares.

31.4The decision of the chairman of any general meeting as to the validity of any appointment of a proxy shall be final.

32.Representation of Corporate Member

32.1A corporation which is a Member may, by written instrument, authorise such person or persons as it thinks fit to act as its representative at any meeting and any person so authorised shall be entitled to exercise the same powers on behalf of the corporation which such person represents as that corporation could exercise if it were an

A-22



Table of Contents

individual Member, and that Member shall be deemed to be present in person at any such meeting attended by its authorised representative or representatives.

32.2Notwithstanding the foregoing, the chairman of the meeting may accept such assurances as he thinks fit as to the right of any person to attend and vote at general meetings on behalf of a corporation which is a Member.

33.Adjournment of General Meeting

33.1The chairman of a general meeting at which a quorum is present may with the consent of the Members holding a majority of the voting rights of those Members present in person or by proxy (and shall if so directed by Members holding a majority of the voting rights of those Members present in person or by proxy), adjourn the meeting.

33.2The chairman of a general meeting may adjourn the meeting to another time and place without the consent or direction of the Members if it appears to him that:

(a)it is likely to be impractical to hold or continue that meeting because of the number of Members wishing to attend who are not present; or

(b)the unruly conduct of persons attending the meeting prevents, or is likely to prevent, the orderly continuation of the business of the meeting; or

(c)an adjournment is otherwise necessary so that the business of the meeting may be properly conducted.

33.3Unless the meeting is adjourned to a specific date, place and time announced at the meeting being adjourned, fresh notice of the date, place and time for the resumption of the adjourned meeting shall be given to each Member entitled to attend and vote thereat in accordance with these Bye-laws.

34.Written Resolutions

34.1Subject to subparagraph (6), anything which may be done by resolution of the Company in general meeting or by resolution of a meeting of any class of the Members of the Company, may, without a meeting and without any previous notice being required, be done by resolution in writing signed by, or, in the case of a Member that is a corporation whether or not a company within the meaning of the Act, on behalf of, all the Members who at the date of the resolution would be entitled to attend the meeting and vote on the resolution.

34.2A resolution in writing may be signed by, or, in the case of a Member that is a corporation whether or not a company within the meaning of the Act, on behalf of, all the Members, or any class thereof, in as many counterparts as may be necessary.

34.3For the purposes of this Bye-law, the date of the resolution is the date when the resolution is signed by, or, in the case of a Member that is a corporation whether or not a company within the meaning of the Act, on behalf of, the last Member to sign and

A-23



Table of Contents

any reference in any Bye-law to the date of passing of a resolution is, in relation to a resolution made in accordance with this Bye-law, a reference to such date.

34.4A resolution in writing made in accordance with this Bye-law is as valid as if it had been passed by the Company in general meeting or by a meeting of the relevant class of Members, as the case may be and any reference in any Bye-law to a meeting at which a resolution is passed or to Members voting in favour of a resolution shall be construed accordingly.

34.5A resolution in writing made in accordance with this Bye-law shall constitute minutes for the purposes of sections 81 and 82 of the Act.

34.6This Bye-law shall not apply to:

(a)a resolution passed pursuant to section 89(5) of the Act; or

(b)a resolution passed for the purpose of removing a Director before the expiration of his term of office under these Bye-laws.

35.Directors Attendance at General Meetings

The Directors shall be entitled to receive notice of, attend and be heard at any general meeting.

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

36.Election of Directors

36.1Nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors may only be made at a meeting of Members (i) pursuant to the Company’s notice and proxy materials for such meeting, (ii) by or at the direction of the Board of Directors, or (iii) by any Member of record of the Company at the time of the giving of the notice required in this Bye-law 36 who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has complied with the notice procedures set forth in this Bye-law 36. For the avoidance of doubt, the foregoing clause (iii) shall be the exclusive means for a Member to make nominations at a meeting of Members.

36.2For nominations to be properly brought before a meeting by a Member of record pursuant to clause (iii) of Bye-law 36.1, (i) the Member of record must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the Secretary of the Company, (ii) the Member of record must provide to the Secretary of the Company any updates or supplements to such notice at the times and in the forms specified in this Bye-law 36, and (iii) the Member of record and the beneficial owner or owners, if any, on whose behalf any nomination is made, must have acted in accordance with the representations set forth in the Nomination Solicitation Statement (as defined in Bye-law 36.5(i)).

36.3Where a nomination of person(s) for election to the Board of Directors is to be made by a Member at an annual general meeting, to be timely, a notice by a Member of record must be received by the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Company

A-24



Table of Contents

not less than sixty (60) days or more than ninety (90) days prior to the date of the annual general meeting. Notwithstanding anything in the preceding sentence to the contrary, in the event that the number of directors to be elected to the Board of Directors is increased and there has been no public announcement naming all of the nominees for director or indicating the increase in the size of the Board of Directors made by the Company at least 10 days before the last day a Member of record may deliver a notice of nomination in accordance with the preceding sentence, a notice by a Member of record required by this Bye-law shall also be considered timely, but only with respect to nominees for any new positions created by such increase in the number of directors, if it shall be received by the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Company not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which such public announcement is first made by the Company. Where a nomination of person(s) for election to the Board of Directors is to be made by a Member at a special general meeting, such notice must be given not later than ten (10) days following the earlier of the date on which notice of the special general meeting was posted to Members or the date on which public disclosure of the date of the special general meeting was made. In no event shall an adjournment, or postponement of a meeting for which notice has been given, commence a new time period for the giving of a Member of record’s notice.

36.4As to each person whom the Member of record proposes to nominate for election or reelection as a director, the notice by a Member of record shall set forth:

(a)information relating to such person as would be required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for the election of such nominees as directors pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act;

(b)a description of all direct and indirect compensation or other material monetary agreements, arrangements and understandings during the past three years, and any other material relationships, between or among such Member of record and beneficial owner or owners, if any, or other person on whose behalf the nomination is made, and their respective affiliates and associates, or other persons acting in concert therewith, on the one hand, and each proposed nominee and his or her respective affiliates and associates or other persons acting in concert therewith, on the other hand, including without limitation all information that would be required to be disclosed pursuant to Rule 404 promulgated under Regulation S-K if the Member of record making the nomination and any beneficial owner or owners, if any, or other person on whose behalf the nomination is made, or any affiliate or associate thereof or other person acting in concert therewith, were the “registrant” for purposes of such rule and the nominee were a director or executive officer of such registrant.  For purposes of these Bye-laws, a person shall be deemed to be acting in concert with another person if such person knowingly acts toward a common goal relating to the management, governance or control of the

A-25



Table of Contents

Company in parallel with such other person where (i) each person is conscious of the other person’s conduct or intent and this awareness is an element in their decision-making process and (ii) at least one additional factor suggests that persons intend to act in parallel, which additional factors may include attending meetings, conducting discussions or making or soliciting invitations to act in parallel;

(c)such person’s written consent to serve as a director if elected; and

(d)a completed and signed questionnaire, representation or agreement as may be required by the Company pursuant to these Bye-laws.

36.5As to (1) the Member of record giving the notice and (2) the beneficial owner or owners, if any, or other persons on whose behalf the nomination is made or acting in concert therewith (each, a “party”), the notice shall set forth:

(a)the name and address of such party;

(b)the class, series, and number of shares of the Company that are owned, directly or indirectly, beneficially and of record by each such party;

(c)any option, warrant, convertible security, stock appreciation right, or similar right with an exercise or conversion privilege or providing for a settlement payment or mechanism based on the price of any class or series of shares of the Company or with a value derived in whole or in part from the value of any class or series of shares of the Company, whether or not such instrument or right shall be subject to settlement in the underlying class or series of capital stock of the Company or otherwise (a “Derivative Instrument”) directly or indirectly owned beneficially by each such party or such beneficial owner, and any other direct or indirect opportunity to profit or share in any profit derived from any increase or decrease in the value of shares of the Company, including a description of all agreements, arrangements, understandings or relationships (including any short interest or other borrowing arrangements) engaged in directly or indirectly, by such party or such beneficial owner, the purpose or effect of which is to mitigate loss to, reduce the economic risk (or ownership or otherwise) of any class or series of shares of the Company, manage the risk of share price changes for, or increase or decrease the voting power of, such party or beneficial owner, or which provides, directly or indirectly, such party or beneficial owner with the opportunity to profit or share in any profit from any decrease in the price or value of the shares of any class or series of shares of the Company;

(d)any proportionate interest in shares of the Company or Derivative Instruments held, directly or indirectly, by a general or limited partnership in which any

A-26



Table of Contents

party is a general partner or, directly or indirectly, beneficially owns an interest in a general partner;

(e)any performance-related fees (other than an asset-based fee) that each Member is directly or indirectly entitled to based on any increase or decrease in the value of shares of the Company or Derivative Instruments, if any, as of the date of such notice, including without limitation any such interests held by members of each such party immediate family sharing the same household (which information set forth in this paragraph shall be supplemented by such party or such beneficial owner or other person, as the case may be, not later than 10 days after the record date for the meeting to disclose such ownership as of the record date);

(f)any proxy, contract, arrangement, understanding or relationship pursuant to which any party, either directly or acting in concert with another person or persons, has a right to vote, directly or indirectly, any shares of any security of the Company;

(g)any rights to dividends on the shares of the Company owned beneficially directly or indirectly by each such party that are separated or separable from the underlying shares of the Company;

(h)a representation that such party intends to appear in person or by proxy at the general meeting to propose such nomination;

(i)a statement as to whether or not each such party will deliver a proxy statement and form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of voting power of all of the shares of capital stock of the Company reasonably believed by the Member of record or beneficial owner or owners, as the case may be, to be sufficient to elect the persons proposed to be nominated by the Member of record (such statement, a “Nomination Solicitation Statement”); and

(j)any other information relating to each such party that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for, as applicable, the proposal and/or for the election of directors in a contested election pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act (whether or not such party intends to deliver a proxy statement or conduct its own proxy solicitation).

A-27



Table of Contents

36.6A Member of record providing notice of a nomination of director before a meeting shall further update and supplement such notice, if necessary, so that the information provided or required to be provided in such notice pursuant to this Bye-law 36 shall be true and correct as of the record date for the meeting and as of the date that is ten (10) business days prior to the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, and such update and supplement shall be delivered to, or mailed and received by, the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Company not later than five (5) business days after the record date for the meeting (in the case of the update and supplement required to be made as of the record date), and not later than five (5) business days prior to the date for the meeting, if practicable (or, if not practicable, on the first practicable date prior to) any adjournment or postponement thereof (in the case of the update and supplement required to be made as of ten (10) business days prior to the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof).

36.7A person shall not be eligible for election or re-election as a director at a meeting unless (i) the person is nominated by a Member of record in accordance with this Bye-law; or (ii) the person is nominated by or at the direction of the Board of Directors or a duly authorized committee thereof. The chair of the meeting shall have the power and the duty to determine whether a nomination to be brought before the meeting has been made in accordance with the procedures set forth in these Bye-laws and, if any proposed nomination is not in compliance with these Bye-laws, to declare that such nomination shall not be presented for Member action at the meeting and shall be disregarded.

36.8Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Bye-law, a Member shall also comply with all applicable requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder with respect to matters set forth in this Bye-law. Nothing in this Bye-law 36 shall be deemed to affect any rights of Members to request inclusion of non-binding proposals in the Company’s proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act.

37.Number of Directors

The Board shall consist of such number of Directors being not less than two Directors and not more than such maximum number of Directors as the Board may from time to time determine.

38.Eligibility as a Director

To be eligible to be a nominee for election or reelection as a director of the Company pursuant to clause (iii) of Bye-law 36.1, a person must deliver (in accordance with the time periods prescribed for delivery of notice under Bye-law 36 of these Bye-laws or such period as the Board of Directors may specify) to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Company a written questionnaire with respect to the background and qualification of such person and the background of any other person or entity on whose behalf the nomination is

A-28



Table of Contents

being made (which form of questionnaire shall be provided by the Secretary upon written request) and a written representation and agreement (in the form provided by the Secretary upon written request) that such person (A) is not and will not become a party to (1) any agreement, arrangement or understanding with, and has not given any commitment or assurance to, any person or entity as to how such person, if elected as a director of the Company, will act or vote on any issue or question (a “Voting Commitment”) that has not been disclosed in writing to the Company or (2) any Voting Commitment that could limit or interfere with such person’s ability to comply, if elected as a director of the Company, with such person’s fiduciary duties under applicable law, (B) is not and will not become a party to any agreement, arrangement or understanding with any person or entity other than the Company with respect to any direct or indirect compensation, reimbursement or indemnification in connection with service or action as a director that has not been disclosed therein, and (C) in such person’s individual capacity and on behalf of any person or entity on whose behalf the nomination is being made, would be in compliance, if elected as a director of the Company, and will comply with all applicable publicly disclosed corporate governance, conflict of interest, confidentiality and stock ownership and trading policies and guidelines of the Company.

39.Removal of Directors

39.1Subject to Bye-law 21 and any provision to the contrary in these Bye-laws, the Members entitled to vote for the election of Directors may, at any special general meeting convened and held in accordance with these Bye-laws, remove a Director, provided that the notice of any such meeting convened for the purpose of removing a Director shall contain a statement of the intention so to do and be served on such Director not less than 60 days before the meeting and at such meeting the Director shall be entitled to be heard on the motion for such Director’s removal.

39.2If a Director is removed from the Board under this Bye-law the Members may fill the vacancy at the meeting at which such Director is removed.  In the absence of such election or appointment, the Board may fill the vacancy.

40.Vacancy in the Office of Director

40.1The office of Director shall be vacated if the Director:

(a)is removed from office pursuant to these Bye-laws or is prohibited from being a Director by law;

(b)is or becomes bankrupt, or makes any arrangement or composition with his creditors generally;

(c)is or becomes of unsound mind or dies; or

(d)resigns his office by notice to the Company.

40.2The Board or, subject to Bye-laws 36 and 38, the Members in general meeting, shall have the power to appoint any person as a Director to fill a vacancy on the Board

A-29



Table of Contents

occurring as a result of the death, disability, disqualification or resignation of any Director or as a result of an increase in the size of the Board.

41.Remuneration of Directors

The remuneration (if any) of the Directors shall be determined by the Company in general meeting or the Board and shall be deemed to accrue from day to day.  The Directors may also be paid all travel, hotel and other expenses properly incurred by them in attending and returning from Board meetings, meetings of any committee appointed by the Board or general meetings, or in connection with the business of the Company or their duties as Directors generally.

42.Defect in Appointment

All acts done in good faith by the Board, any Director, a member of a committee appointed by the Board, any person to whom the Board may have delegated any of its powers, or any person acting as a Director shall, notwithstanding that it be afterwards discovered that there was some defect in the appointment of any Director or person acting as aforesaid, or that he was, or any of them were, disqualified, be as valid as if every such person had been duly appointed and was qualified to be a Director or act in the relevant capacity.

43.Directors to Manage Business

43.1The business of the Company shall be managed and conducted by the Board.  In managing the business of the Company, the Board may exercise all such powers of the Company as are not, by the Act or by these Bye-laws, required to be exercised by the Company in general meeting.

43.2When and as authorised by the affirmative vote or the written consent of the holders of shares holding at the date of the resolution or consent as the case may be not less than sixty six and two thirds percent of the paid up share capital of the Company as at the date of the resolution or consent carries the right to vote at general meetings of the Company, and not otherwise, the Board shall have the power to sell, lease or exchange all the property and assets of the Company, including its goodwill and its corporate franchises upon such temps and conditions and for such consideration, which may be in whole or in part shares of stock, in, and/or other securities of, any other company or companies, as the Board shall deem expedient and for the best interest of the Company.

43.3Subject to these Bye-laws, the Board may delegate to any company, firm, person, or body of persons any power of the Board (including the power to sub-delegate).

A-30



Table of Contents

44.Powers of the Board of Directors

The Board may:

(a)appoint, suspend, or remove any manager, secretary, clerk, agent or employee of the Company and may fix their remuneration and determine their duties;

(b)exercise all the powers of the Company to borrow money and to mortgage or charge or otherwise grant a security interest in its undertaking, property and uncalled capital, or any part thereof, and may issue debentures, debenture stock and other securities whether outright or as security for any debt, liability or obligation of the Company or any third party;

(c)appoint one or more Directors to the office of managing director or chief executive officer of the Company, who shall, subject to the control of the Board, supervise and administer all of the general business and affairs of the Company;

(d)appoint a person to act as manager of the Company’s day-to-day business and may entrust to and confer upon such manager such powers and duties as it deems appropriate for the transaction or conduct of such business;

(e)by power of attorney, appoint any company, firm, person or body of persons, whether nominated directly or indirectly by the Board, to be an attorney of the Company for such purposes and with such powers, authorities and discretions (not exceeding those vested in or exercisable by the Board) and for such period and subject to such conditions as it may think fit and any such power of attorney may contain such provisions for the protection and convenience of persons dealing with any such attorney as the Board may think fit and may also authorise any such attorney to sub-delegate all or any of the powers, authorities and discretions so vested in the attorney;

(f)procure that the Company pays all expenses incurred in promoting and incorporating the Company and listing the shares of the Company;

(g)delegate any of its powers (including the power to sub-delegate) to a committee of one or more persons appointed by the Board which may consist partly or entirely of non-Directors, provided that every such committee shall conform to such directions as the Board shall impose on them and provided further that the meetings and proceedings of any such committee shall be governed by the provisions of these Bye-laws regulating the meetings and proceedings of the Board, so far as the same are applicable and are not superseded by directions imposed by the Board;

(h)delegate any of its powers (including the power to sub-delegate) to any person on such terms and in such manner as the Board may see fit;

(i)present any petition and make any application in connection with the liquidation or reorganisation of the Company;

A-31



Table of Contents

(j)in connection with the issue of any share, pay such commission and brokerage as may be permitted by law; and

(k)authorise any company, firm, person or body of persons to act on behalf of the Company for any specific purpose and in connection therewith to execute any deed, agreement, document or instrument on behalf of the Company.

45.Register of Directors and Officers

The Board shall cause to be kept in one or more books at the registered office of the Company a Register of Directors and Officers and shall enter therein the particulars required by the Act.

46.Appointment of Officers

The Board may appoint such Officers (who may or may not be Directors) as the Board may determine for such terms as the Board deems fit.

47.Appointment of Secretary

The Secretary shall be appointed by the Board from time to time for such term as the Board deems fit.

48.Duties of Officers

The Officers shall have such powers and perform such duties in the management, business and affairs of the Company as may be delegated to them by the Board from time to time.

49.Remuneration of Officers

The Officers shall receive such remuneration as the Board may determine.

50.Conflicts of Interest

50.1Any Director, or any Director’s firm, partner or any company with whom any Director is associated, may act in any capacity for, be employed by or render services to the Company on such terms, including with respect to remuneration, as may be agreed between the parties.  Nothing herein contained shall authorise a Director or a Director’s firm, partner or company to act as Auditor to the Company.

50.2A Director who is directly or indirectly interested in a contract or proposed contract with the Company (an “Interested Director”) shall declare the nature of such interest as required by the Act.

50.3An Interested Director who has complied with the requirements of the foregoing Bye-law may:

(a)vote in respect of such contract or proposed contract; and/or

(b)be counted in the quorum for the meeting at which the contract or proposed contract is to be voted on,

A-32



Table of Contents

and no such contract or proposed contract shall be void or voidable by reason only that the Interested Director voted on it or was counted in the quorum of the relevant meeting and the Interested Director shall not be liable to account to the Company for any profit realised thereby.

51.Indemnification and Exculpation of Directors and Officers

51.1The Directors, Resident Representative, Secretary and other Officers (such term to include any person appointed to any committee by the Board) acting in relation to any of the affairs of the Company or any subsidiary thereof and the liquidator or trustees (if any) acting in relation to any of the affairs of the Company or any subsidiary thereof and every one of them (whether for the time being or formerly), and their heirs, executors and administrators (each of which an “indemnified party”), shall be indemnified and secured harmless out of the assets of the Company from and against all actions, costs, charges, losses, damages and expenses which they or any of them, their heirs, executors or administrators, shall or may incur or sustain by or by reason of any act done, concurred in or omitted in or about the execution of their duty, or supposed duty, or in their respective offices or trusts, and no indemnified party shall be answerable for the acts, receipts, neglects or defaults of the others of them or for joining in any receipts for the sake of conformity, or for any bankers or other persons with whom any moneys or effects belonging to the Company shall or may be lodged or deposited for safe custody, or for insufficiency or deficiency of any security upon which any moneys of or belonging to the Company shall be placed out on or invested, or for any other loss, misfortune or damage which may happen in the execution of their respective offices or trusts, or in relation thereto, PROVIDED THAT this indemnity shall not extend to any matter in respect of any fraud or dishonesty in relation to the Company which may attach to any of the indemnified parties.

51.2The Company may purchase and maintain insurance for the benefit of any Director or Officer against any liability incurred by him under the Act in his capacity as a Director or Officer or indemnifying such Director or Officer in respect of any loss arising or liability attaching to him by virtue of any rule of law in respect of any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust of which the Director or Officer may be guilty in relation to the Company or any subsidiary thereof.

51.3The Company may advance moneys to a Director or Officer for the costs, charges and expenses incurred by the Director or Officer in defending any civil or criminal proceedings against him, on condition that the Director or Officer shall repay the advance if any allegation of fraud or dishonesty in relation to the Company is proved against him.

51.4Each Member agrees to waive any claim or right of action such Member might have, whether individually or by or in the right of the Company, against any Director or Officer on account of any action taken by such Director or Officer, or the failure of such Director or Officer to take any action in the performance of his duties with or for

A-33



Table of Contents

the Company or any subsidiary thereof, PROVIDED THAT such waiver shall not extend to any matter in respect of any fraud or dishonesty in relation to the Company which may attach to such Director or Officer.

MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

52.Board Meetings

The Board may meet for the transaction of business, adjourn and otherwise regulate its meetings as it sees fit.  Subject to these Bye-laws, a resolution put to the vote at a Board meeting shall be carried by the affirmative votes of a majority of the votes cast and in the case of an equality of votes the resolution shall fail.

53.Notice of Board Meetings

A Director may, and the Secretary on the requisition of a Director shall, at any time summon a Board meeting.  Notice of a meeting of the Board shall be deemed to be duly given to a Director if it is given to such Director verbally (including in person or by telephone) or otherwise communicated or sent to such Director by post, electronic means or other mode of representing words in a visible form at such Director’s last known address or in accordance with any other instructions given by such Director to the Company for this purpose.

54.Electronic Participation in Meetings

Directors may participate in any meeting by such telephonic, electronic or other communications facilities or means as permit all persons participating in the meeting to communicate with each other simultaneously and instantaneously, and participation in such a meeting shall constitute presence in person at such meeting.

55.Quorum at Board Meetings

The quorum necessary for the transaction of business at a Board meeting shall be two Directors, provided that at any time the Company is listed on an appointed stock exchange, as that term is defined in the Act, the quorum necessary for the transaction of business at a meeting of the Board shall be a majority of the Directors then in office.

56.Board to Continue in the Event of Vacancy

The Board may act notwithstanding any vacancy in its number but, if and so long as its number is reduced below the number fixed by these Bye-laws as the quorum necessary for the transaction of business at Board meetings, the continuing Directors or Director may act for the purpose of (i) summoning a general meeting; or (ii) preserving the assets of the Company.

57.Chairman to Preside

Unless otherwise agreed by a majority of the Directors attending a Board meeting, the chairman of the Company, if there be one who is present, and if not, the president of the Company, if there be one who is present, shall act as chairman at such Board meeting.  In their absence a chairman of the meeting shall be appointed or elected by the Directors present at the meeting.

A-34



Table of Contents

58.Written Resolutions

A resolution signed by all the Directors, which may be in counterparts, shall be as valid as if it had been passed at a Board meeting duly called and constituted, such resolution to be effective on the date on which the resolution is signed by the last Director.

59.Validity of Prior Acts of the Board

No regulation or alteration to these Bye-laws made by the Company in general meeting shall invalidate any prior act of the Board which would have been valid if that regulation or alteration had not been made.

CORPORATE RECORDS

60.Minutes

The Board shall cause minutes to be duly entered in books provided for the purpose:

(a)of all elections and appointments of Officers;

(b)of the names of the Directors present at each Board meeting and of any committee appointed by the Board; and

(c)of all resolutions and proceedings of general meetings of the Members, Board meetings, and meetings of committees appointed by the Board.

61.Place Where Corporate Records Kept

Minutes prepared in accordance with the Act and these Bye-laws shall be kept by the Secretary at the registered office of the Company.

62.Form and Use of Seal

62.1The Company may adopt a seal in such form as the Board may determine.  The Board may adopt one or more duplicate seals for use in or outside Bermuda.

62.2A seal may, but need not be affixed to any deed, instrument or document, and if the seal is to be affixed thereto, it shall be attested by the signature of (i) any Director; or (ii) any Officer; or (iii) the Secretary; or (iv) any person authorized by the Board for that purpose

62.3A Resident Representative may, but need not, affix the seal of the Company to certify the authenticity of any copies of documents.

A-35



Table of Contents

ACCOUNTS

63.Records of Account

63.1The Board shall cause to be kept proper records of account with respect to all transactions of the Company and in particular with respect to:

(a)all amounts of money received and expended by the Company and the matters in respect of which the receipt and expenditure relates;

(b)all sales and purchases of goods by the Company; and

(c)all assets and liabilities of the Company.

63.2Such records of account shall be kept at the registered office of the Company, or subject to the Act, at such other place as the Board thinks fit and shall be available for inspection by the Directors during normal business hours.

63.3Such records of account shall be retained for a minimum period of five years from the date on which they are prepared.

64.Financial Year End

The financial year end of the Company may be determined by resolution of the Board and failing such resolution shall be the last day in February in each year.

AUDITS

65.Annual Audit

Subject to any rights to waive laying of accounts or appointment of an Auditor pursuant to the Act, the accounts of the Company shall be audited at least once in every year.

66.Appointment of Auditor

66.1Subject to the Act, Members shall appoint an auditor to the Company to hold office for such term as the Members deem fit or until a successor is appointed.

66.2The Auditor may be a Member but no Director, Officer or employee of the Company shall, during his continuance in office, be eligible to act as an Auditor of the Company.

67.Remuneration of Auditor

67.1The remuneration of an Auditor appointed by the Members shall be fixed by the Company in general meeting or in such manner as the Members may determine.

67.2The remuneration of an Auditor appointed by the Board to fill a casual vacancy in accordance with these Bye-laws shall be fixed by the Board.

68.Duties of Auditor

68.1The financial statements provided for by these Bye-laws shall be audited by the Auditor in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.  The Auditor shall make a written report thereon in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.

A-36



Table of Contents

68.2The generally accepted auditing standards referred to in this Bye-law may be those of a country or jurisdiction other than Bermuda or such other generally accepted auditing standards as may be provided for in the Act.  If so, the financial statements and the report of the Auditor shall identify the generally accepted auditing standards used.

69.Access to Records

The Auditor shall at all reasonable times have access to all books kept by the Company and to all accounts and vouchers relating thereto, and the Auditor may call on the Directors or Officers for any information in their possession relating to the books or affairs of the Company.

70.Financial Statements and the Auditor’s Report

70.1Subject to the following bye-law, the financial statements and/or the auditor’s report as required by the Act shall

(a)be laid before the Members at the annual general meeting; or

(b)be received, accepted, adopted or approved by the Members by written resolution passed in accordance with these Bye-laws.

70.2If all Members and Directors shall agree, either in writing or at a meeting, that in respect of a particular interval no financial statements and/or auditor’s report thereon need be made available to the Members, and/or that no auditor shall be appointed then there shall be no obligation on the Company to do so.

71.Vacancy in the Office of Auditor

The Board may fill any casual vacancy in the office of the auditor.

A-37



Table of Contents

VOLUNTARY WINDING-UP AND DISSOLUTION

72.Winding-Up

If the Company shall be wound up the liquidator may, with the sanction of a resolution of the Members, divide amongst the Members in specie or in kind the whole or any part of the assets of the Company (whether they shall consist of property of the same kind or not) and may, for such purpose, set such value as he deems fair upon any property to be divided as aforesaid and may determine how such division shall be carried out as between the Members or different classes of Members.  The liquidator may, with the like sanction, vest the whole or any part of such assets in the trustees upon such trusts for the benefit of the Members as the liquidator shall think fit, but so that no Member shall be compelled to accept any shares or other securities or assets whereon there is any liability.

CHANGES TO CONSTITUTION

73.Changes to Bye-laws

No Bye-law shall be rescinded, altered or amended and no new Bye-law shall be made until the same has been approved by a resolution of the Board and by a resolution of the Members.

74.Discontinuance

The Board may exercise all the powers of the Company to discontinue the Company to a jurisdiction outside Bermuda pursuant to the Act.

A-38



Table of Contents

HELEN OF TROY LIMITED

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

PROXY

 

PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

The undersigned hereby authorizes each of Julien R. Mininberg and Vincent D. Carson as Proxy with power of substitution, to represent the undersigned at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of Helen of Troy Limited (the “Company”) to be held on Tuesday,Wednesday, August 26, 2014,17, 2016, at 1:00 p.m., Mountain Daylight Time, atin the Marriott Hotel 1600 Airway Blvd.,Indigo El Paso Downtown, 325 N. Kansas Street, El Paso, Texas 79901, and any adjournment thereof, and to vote all the common shares of the Company that the undersigned is entitled to vote on the following matters:

 

1.              To set the number of Director positions at eight (or such lower number as shall equal the number of nominees elected as Directors) and to elect each of the following nominees to the Board of Directors:

 

01 – Gary B. Abromovitz

For [__]

Against [__]For []

Against []

Abstain [__][]

 

 

 

 

02 – John B. Butterworth

For [__]

Against [__]For []

Against []

Abstain [__][]

 

 

 

 

03 – Alexander M. Davern

For [__]

Against [__]For []

Against []

Abstain [__][]

 

 

 

 

04 – Timothy F. Meeker

For [__]

Against [__]For []

Against []

Abstain [__][]

 

 

 

 

05 – Julien R. Mininberg

For [__]

Against [__]For []

Against []

Abstain [__][]

 

 

 

 

06 – Beryl B. Raff

For [__]

Against [__]For []

Against []

Abstain [__][]

 

 

 

 

07 – William F. Susetka

For [__]

Against [__]For []

Against []

Abstain [__][]

 

 

 

 

08 – Darren G. Woody

For [__]

Against [__]For []

Against []

Abstain [__][]

2.Advisory vote to approve the Company’s executive compensation.

 

For [__]

Against [__]

2.              Advisory vote to approve the Company’s executive compensation.

For []

Against []

Abstain [__][]

3A.     To approve amendments to the Company’s Bye-laws regarding advance notice provisions for director nominations and director eligibility

For []

Against []

Abstain []

3B.     To approve amendments to the Company’s Bye-laws regarding advance notice provisions for shareholder proposals of business (other than director nominations)

For []

Against []

Abstain []

3C.     To approve amendments to the Company’s Bye-laws regarding majority voting in director elections except plurality voting in contested director elections

For []

Against []

Abstain []

3D.     To approve amendments to the Company’s Bye-laws regarding authorization to fix number of directors and filling a vacancy on the board

For []

Against []

Abstain []

3E.      To approve amendments to the Company’s Bye-laws regarding casting of votes

For []

Against []

Abstain []

3F.       To approve amendments to the Company’s Bye-laws regarding appointment of proxy

For []

Against []

Abstain []

3G.     To approve amendments to the Company’s Bye-laws regarding director remuneration

For []

Against []

Abstain []

3H.    To approve other changes to the Company’s Bye-laws

For []

Against []

Abstain []

3I.         To approve amendments to the Company’s Bye-laws regarding authorisation to carry out the powers given the Board of Directors in the Company’s Bye-laws

For []

Against []

Abstain []

 



3.Table of Contents

4.              To approve an amendment to the Helen of Troy Limited Amended and Restated 2011 Annual Incentive Plan.

 

 

For [__]

Against [__]For []

Against []

Abstain [__][]

 

4.5.              To appoint Grant Thornton LLP as the Company’s auditor and independent registered public accounting firm to serve for the 20152016 fiscal year and to authorize the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to set the auditor’s remuneration.

 

 

For [__]

Against [__]For []

Against []

Abstain [__][]

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE LISTED NOMINEES IN PROPOSAL 1 AND A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSALS 2, 33A, 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E, 3F, 3G, 3H, 3I, 4, AND 4.5. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned shareholder. IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE LISTED NOMINEES IN PROPOSAL 1 AND FOR PROPOSALS 2, 33A, 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E, 3F, 3G, 3H, 3I, 4, AND 4.5.

 

 

THIS PROXY ALSO GRANTS AUTHORITY TO VOTE SUCH SHARES AS TO ANY OTHER MATTER, WHICH MAY BE BROUGHT BEFORE THE MEETING IN THE SOLE DISCRETION OF THE HOLDERS OF THIS PROXY.

 

IMPORTANT: Please date this proxy and sign exactly as your name or names appear hereon. If shares are held jointly, signature should include both names. Executors, administrators, trustees, guardians, and others signing in the representative capacity, please so indicate when signing.

 

DATE:

, 2014

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

SIGNATURE 1:

 

 

SIGNATURE 2, IF HELD JOINTLY:

 

 

 

PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY PROMPTLY IN THE ACCOMPANYING ENVELOPE.ENVELOPE